Read more.Can these two enthusiast cards game at 4K?
Read more.Can these two enthusiast cards game at 4K?
it will pas another 2 years till will be able so have a smooth experience in 4k :/
Some interesting results there given the difference in price but could I ask one thing.
Could you keep the charts in the same format for each page please...it gets a tad confusing especially when AMD becomes the green team and Nvidia the red.
Thanks
Of course I'm perfect you just need to lower your expectations.
I need to know the multi-monitor performance !
GeForce GTX Titan and upcoming Radeon R9 290X will not give playable FPS at 4k.
As mentioned by Attila the Bun, what was the reason for choosing 2 cards that are from very differnet price points? Surely this is little misleading as the performance of the 2 cards is very close but the difference of performance vs price is very big.
Usually you guys compare cards in the same price range to show what the direct competition has to offer at the same price point which is a fair comparison.
Of course I'm perfect you just need to lower your expectations.
Ah heh ok. It was a little bit confusing to start with but it makes sense instead of having one vendors card at the top even in the cases where it's not fastest. I have a feeling we might see quite a lot of positional switching between Titan and the 290X soon.
So if, as it seems, the short of it is that 4K monitors will become affordable at about the same time that cards come out that can handle gaming at that resolution? That sounds perfect to me! 2015 will be a good year.
Incidentally, the review mentions use of AA at various levels ("Removal of the 4x AA setting isn't enough to increase performance to an average of over 25fps", etc)...
Just wondering: why did you have AA on at all? I thought the part of the point of ultra-high resolutions was that we wouldn't need AA anymore since the ppi would be so high?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)