Read more.Quote:
The first SSD from the new Toshiba era.
Printable View
Read more.Quote:
The first SSD from the new Toshiba era.
Surprised they haven't dropped the tarnished OCZ name and kept them with Toshiba branding.
Great, thx for this review!
Confused, how did you come to the conclusion it is a reliable drive? I dont think you can come to that conclusion in such a short space of time.
Not sure about this to be honest it seems rather average :P.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hicks12
Maybe because the biggest reliability factor (will OCZ go bankrupt?) has been taken away. I mean, no matter how badly OCZ perform from now on, it must be very unlikely that they could bankrupt Toshiba
.
Still, I would not buy one unless there was some kind of indemnity bound...
Reliable in the sense that it has reliable performance once in a dirty state. Perhaps I should make this clearer.
For the price, it does better than average in the Iometer and expanded storage tests, beating out the MX100 by a very healthy degree.
Makes more sense then Tarinder, to me your summary points all lead to it being a 'reliable' drive in performance so the extra statement for being reliable read as though it meant reliable in terms of durability.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarinder
It does beat the MX100 but then again I dont think it beats it enough as the MX100 does enough for a solid all rounder yet the 256GB version only costs £70 which is almost £50 cheaper than the Vertex 460, I dont think I could warrant that but then thats just me, I like crucial as I know their drives are reliable but OCZ have always been iffy (even excluding the sandforce issues) that it would take a lot for me to try them again.
Where have you seen the MX100 256 for £70? I know it's been thereabouts but have you seen it that low?Quote:
Originally Posted by Hicks12