Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: TP-Link Archer C9

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    TP-Link Archer C9

    A stylish wireless AC router for speedy home networking.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    285
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked
    23 times in 21 posts

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    After seeing the numbers in review I thought maybe it was time to upgrade my router, after all, the conclusion has this as 'Competitively Priced'. At £120 I was a little surprised, I guess I haven't been paying attention to router pricing. I reckon I'll put off the upgrade for a little while

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    55
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    16 times in 10 posts
    • RyanM's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Z77-A
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-4770K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 4GB G.Skill TridentX 2400MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 840 Series SSD, 1TB Samsung F3 HDD, 1TB WD HDD, 2 x 2TB WD Red HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD R9 270 @ 1.15GHz
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX760i
      • Case:
      • Aerocool DS200 Red with Noctua & Noiseblocker Fans, Lamptron CW611 fan controller
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 64 Bit w/ Classic Shell!
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG IPS224 (22" 1080p), LG IPS234 (23" 1080p), Acer S221HQL (22" 1080p)
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet fibre broadband 80/20Mbps Download/Upload

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    Quote Originally Posted by CustardInc View Post
    After seeing the numbers in review I thought maybe it was time to upgrade my router, after all, the conclusion has this as 'Competitively Priced'. At £120 I was a little surprised, I guess I haven't been paying attention to router pricing. I reckon I'll put off the upgrade for a little while
    Competitively priced for an AC1900 unit, it's among the lowest priced out there. Of course there are many other much cheaper routers out there using lower spec'd AC standards. AC750 is the entry-level sweet spot at around £50~, next step up is AC1200 for approximately £70.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    Pricing of routers is a moot point as in this country currently routers are quite often given away...
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  5. #5
    Super Nerd
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    1,785
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    105 times in 72 posts

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    Pricing of routers is a moot point as in this country currently routers are quite often given away...
    Assuming you want a total crap router then yes, given away. Most of the freebie ones are severely limited.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    Still stops the majority of users shelling out for something that is effectively free...
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Redditch, United Kingdom
    Posts
    434
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    17 times in 13 posts

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    I have virgin 2AC router/modem thingy that came with internet. Once I enable 5ghz antenna the speed on it is 10mbps While on 2.4ghz its about 60+mbps. Even if they are called "AC" does not mean they actually work as intended.

    If I would need a wifi of over 60mbps Id be more than willing to pay the premium. Or when I would be ok with 60mbps then the price on tp-link router that would do that is about 10 quid. So they pretty much already are free.
    Last edited by aniilv; 24-02-2015 at 01:33 AM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kingdom of Fife (Scotland)
    Posts
    4,991
    Thanks
    393
    Thanked
    220 times in 190 posts
    • crossy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth X99
      • CPU:
      • Intel 5830k / Noctua NH-D15
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 850Pro NVMe, 1TB Samsung 850EVO SSD, 1TB Seagate SSHD, 2TB WD Green, 8TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix GTX970OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750 (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster HAF932 (with wheels)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit, Ubuntu 16.04LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG Flattron W2361V
      • Internet:
      • VirginMedia 200Mb

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    Quote Originally Posted by aniilv View Post
    I have virgin 2AC router/modem thingy that came with internet. Once I enable 5ghz antenna the speed on it is 10mbps While on 2.4ghz its about 60+mbps. Even if they are called "AC" does not mean they actually work as intended.

    If I would need a wifi of over 60mbps Id be more than willing to pay the premium. Or when I would be ok with 60mbps then the price on tp-link router that would do that is about 10 quid. So they pretty much already are free.
    That'll be one of those "SuperHubs" then? Problem I've found (and seen others reporting) is that the Netgear-made SuperHubs are pretty good on the "Short" benchmark, but mediocre on "Medium" and sometimes fail to do the "Long" one, or do it badly.

    I've got an old (3.5 years old) Linksys 802.11n router that I'd like rid of, but I need good Medium and Long performance. So is this TP-Link (not a company I've bought any gear from) worth getting or should I keep looking?

    Career status: still enjoying my new career in DevOps, but it's keeping me busy...

  9. #9
    Now 100% Apple free cheesemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Near the New forest
    Posts
    2,948
    Thanks
    354
    Thanked
    255 times in 173 posts
    • cheesemp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS TUF x570-plus
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 3600
      • Memory:
      • 16gb Corsair RGB ram
      • Storage:
      • 256Gb NVMe + 500Gb TcSunbow SDD (cheap for games only)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX 480 8Gb Nitro+ OC (with auto OC to above 580 speeds!)
      • PSU:
      • Cooler Master MWE 750 bronze
      • Case:
      • Gamemax f15m
      • Operating System:
      • Win 11
      • Monitor(s):
      • 32" QHD AOC Q3279VWF
      • Internet:
      • FTTC ~35Mb

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    I recently bought a the tp-link archer C2 model for £40 (by 'flubit'ing the £44 amazon price). I'd love to see how it compares at a third of the price. Its AC also (limited to 433Mb) with gigabit ethernet so plenty good enough for the average home user. I'd love to know what extra I would have got for the extra £85 apart from extra speed (that little in a home network uses) and a USB3 port...
    Trust

    Laptop : Dell Inspiron 1545 with Ryzen 5500u, 16gb and 256 NVMe, Windows 11.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kingdom of Fife (Scotland)
    Posts
    4,991
    Thanks
    393
    Thanked
    220 times in 190 posts
    • crossy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth X99
      • CPU:
      • Intel 5830k / Noctua NH-D15
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 850Pro NVMe, 1TB Samsung 850EVO SSD, 1TB Seagate SSHD, 2TB WD Green, 8TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix GTX970OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750 (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster HAF932 (with wheels)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit, Ubuntu 16.04LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG Flattron W2361V
      • Internet:
      • VirginMedia 200Mb

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    Quote Originally Posted by cheesemp View Post
    I recently bought a the tp-link archer C2 model for £40 (by 'flubit'ing the £44 amazon price). I'd love to see how it compares at a third of the price. Its AC also (limited to 433Mb) with gigabit ethernet so plenty good enough for the average home user. I'd love to know what extra I would have got for the extra £85 apart from extra speed (that little in a home network uses) and a USB3 port...
    Dear Hexus,
    Any chance on following up on what 'cheesemp' is saying above and doing a "Is there much real difference between 802.11ac levels..." piece of investigative journalism?

    Signed, a longterm Hexus reader


    I thought the big deal about the higher AC ratings were that they were good if you'd got a couple of high-draw devices, typically tablets streaming high-res Netflix content. Would be nice to know if that actually is the case, or if it's just marketing, especially as some of the AC1900/2400 devices are more than £200! Personally, I'm also very interested in the speed dropoff with range, i.e. can you watch Breaking Bad on your iPad/Galaxy-Tab at the bottom of the garden?

    Career status: still enjoying my new career in DevOps, but it's keeping me busy...

  11. #11
    Senior Member Brewster0101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,614
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    54 times in 44 posts
    • Brewster0101's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus m5a99x evo
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX 8350
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (2x4) Corsair Vengence DDR3 1600mghz
      • Storage:
      • Western Green 3TB + Samsung 850Evo 512MB SSD, + 2TB NAS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 280X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AXi760
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 27" 27EA63 IPS LED
      • Internet:
      • 120Mb Bt

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    D9 has just made my Amazon wish list to replace my home hub 5 - which just can't hack more than 2 wifi connections pulling from it at a time.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    434
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked
    15 times in 14 posts

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    "TP-Link also offers the Archer C9 with a DSL modem and that particular model is aptly named the Archer D9 and retails for around £145."

    I'm probably being stupid but if the C9 doesn't have a DSL modem built in to take a signal from the phone line, then why is it called a "Router" (which I thought had to have a modem built in to be called such)?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    It still routes things though doesn't it
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kingdom of Fife (Scotland)
    Posts
    4,991
    Thanks
    393
    Thanked
    220 times in 190 posts
    • crossy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth X99
      • CPU:
      • Intel 5830k / Noctua NH-D15
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 850Pro NVMe, 1TB Samsung 850EVO SSD, 1TB Seagate SSHD, 2TB WD Green, 8TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix GTX970OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750 (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster HAF932 (with wheels)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit, Ubuntu 16.04LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG Flattron W2361V
      • Internet:
      • VirginMedia 200Mb

    Re: TP-Link Archer C9

    Quote Originally Posted by Noli View Post
    "TP-Link also offers the Archer C9 with a DSL modem and that particular model is aptly named the Archer D9 and retails for around £145."

    I'm probably being stupid but if the C9 doesn't have a DSL modem built in to take a signal from the phone line, then why is it called a "Router" (which I thought had to have a modem built in to be called such)?
    From What is a Network Switch vs. a Router? (Cisco):
    Most business networks today use switches to connect computers, printers and servers within a building or campus. A switch serves as a controller, enabling networked devices to talk to each other efficiently.

    Switches create a network. Routers connect networks. A router links computers to the Internet, so users can share the connection. A router acts as a dispatcher, choosing the best path for information to travel so it's received quickly.
    So it's entirely possible for a router to rely on an external modem to provide that connection to the Internet. The setup I'm using at the moment is just that:

    Internet -> Virgin Superhub (in modem mode because it sucks) -> Linksys router -> Devolo Powerline Ethernet (x2: tx/rx) -> Belkin Switch -> my works laptop (via NX) -> my personal laptop

    Basically I've got a series of nets/hops:
    1. The Internet - a WAN;
    2. Linksys router LAN - mainly wireless but also has that Devolo connection;
    3. My Devolo Powerline network - bridging the Linksys-powered LAN to the devices that aren't wireless;
    4. My switch network - setup because I needed a fast connection between two laptops and a NAS box;

    Career status: still enjoying my new career in DevOps, but it's keeping me busy...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •