Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 43 of 43

Thread: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

  1. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    406
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    13 times in 13 posts
    • Agrippa's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock X299 Taichi XE
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 7820X @ 4.8GHz (delid)
      • Memory:
      • 4x8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C14 @ 3600 CL15
      • Storage:
      • Samsung SM961 256GB, 850 EVO 1TBx2, 850 EVO 250GB, 840 512GB, Seagate 1TB, 2TB, 8x8TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX 1080 Ti RoG Strix
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RM1000x
      • Case:
      • Lian Li D8000
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator Z35P
      • Internet:
      • 500/500 Fiber

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    Quote Originally Posted by ElManCub View Post
    R295x2 is technically two cards and Titan X is one so even though good performance it's not as good as Titan due to the fact titan is one. For a comment near the top
    Ehh, no. It's both physically and technically one card. It just happens to have two GPUs in Crossfire on it.

  2. #34
    Token 'murican GuidoLS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    806
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    110 times in 78 posts
    • GuidoLS's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Pro
      • CPU:
      • C2Q 9550 stock
      • Memory:
      • 8gb Corsair
      • Storage:
      • 2x1tb Hitachi 7200's, WD Velociraptor 320gb primary
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia 9800GT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750w
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • Win10/Slackware Linux dual box
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic 24" 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • AT&T U-Verse 12mb

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    Quote Originally Posted by Agrippa View Post
    Ehh, no. It's both physically and technically one card. It just happens to have two GPUs in Crossfire on it.
    Which means it's an apples to oranges comparison. Not sure why people are trying to say otherwise. I know they came up with some kind of new math from the time I was a kid, but I'm still pretty sure (as in 100%) that 2 does NOT equal 1.

  3. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    406
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    13 times in 13 posts
    • Agrippa's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock X299 Taichi XE
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 7820X @ 4.8GHz (delid)
      • Memory:
      • 4x8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C14 @ 3600 CL15
      • Storage:
      • Samsung SM961 256GB, 850 EVO 1TBx2, 850 EVO 250GB, 840 512GB, Seagate 1TB, 2TB, 8x8TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX 1080 Ti RoG Strix
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RM1000x
      • Case:
      • Lian Li D8000
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator Z35P
      • Internet:
      • 500/500 Fiber

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    I haven't said it isn't technically apples and oranges; I simply wanted to refute the blindingly obvious fallacy that the 295X2 is technically two cards. I mean....you only have to look at it....

    However, for a lot of people, including me, the only meaningful metrics are the price and performance of any single physical card. I have exactly zero desire to run a multi-card setup, but I'm perfectly happy running a multi-GPU setup. I don't give a toss how one card or the other achieves its price/performance ratio, as long as it is in fact one card. Hence for all meaningful purposes comparing the Titan X and 295X2 is indeed apples vs apples.

  4. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    208
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    7 times in 5 posts

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    Well, looking at the only benchmark in common with the 390X leaked slides and, yes, with oooooooooooodles of speculation. The 390X is going to sit pretty side by side with this.

    The slide had tombraider UHD performance at 1.5x that of the 290x, which brings it to 51FPS at it's slowest (compared to the titans 48). I'm not even for a second attempting to push the 390X as the "top card" but it's clearly not being eclipsed by this.

    Depends on pricing now though. If it's $999/£886.94 and the (seemingly) similar performing AMD card sits around £600, that's going to be a pretty hard sell.

  5. #37
    Token 'murican GuidoLS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    806
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    110 times in 78 posts
    • GuidoLS's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Pro
      • CPU:
      • C2Q 9550 stock
      • Memory:
      • 8gb Corsair
      • Storage:
      • 2x1tb Hitachi 7200's, WD Velociraptor 320gb primary
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia 9800GT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750w
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • Win10/Slackware Linux dual box
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic 24" 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • AT&T U-Verse 12mb

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    Quote Originally Posted by Agrippa View Post
    I haven't said it isn't technically apples and oranges; I simply wanted to refute the blindingly obvious fallacy that the 295X2 is technically two cards. I mean....you only have to look at it....

    However, for a lot of people, including me, the only meaningful metrics are the price and performance of any single physical card. I have exactly zero desire to run a multi-card setup, but I'm perfectly happy running a multi-GPU setup. I don't give a toss how one card or the other achieves its price/performance ratio, as long as it is in fact one card. Hence for all meaningful purposes comparing the Titan X and 295X2 is indeed apples vs apples.
    It's a single card that has the innards of 2 cards shoved on to it. No, it isn't "2" cards. It's also still not a straight up comparison to the single GPU Titan. And at launch, the 295x2 was selling, retail, for $1500US. So maybe a 2gpu card that originally retailed for 50% more than the Titan does should outperform it.

    And as for the 390X, to quote someone else, from another thread - I put no stock in leaked benchmarks.

  6. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    406
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    13 times in 13 posts
    • Agrippa's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock X299 Taichi XE
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 7820X @ 4.8GHz (delid)
      • Memory:
      • 4x8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C14 @ 3600 CL15
      • Storage:
      • Samsung SM961 256GB, 850 EVO 1TBx2, 850 EVO 250GB, 840 512GB, Seagate 1TB, 2TB, 8x8TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX 1080 Ti RoG Strix
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RM1000x
      • Case:
      • Lian Li D8000
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator Z35P
      • Internet:
      • 500/500 Fiber

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    Quote Originally Posted by GuidoLS View Post
    It's a single card...
    And that there is all I was originally saying. As for your not thinking it's a valid comparison, that's of course up to you. For me it's the only meaningful comparison there is, along with price and performance. And what the price was at launch is entirely irrelevant, except for those (very few, I think) who may find themselves frozen in time. My own experience of time appears to still be moving linearly forward and my calendar reads 20.03.2015, so you'll have to pardon me for being more concerned with the price/performance right now.

  7. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    Thank you for actually including the GTX 780ti in this. More and more, I am finding reviews that are not included "last" generation's top tier cards in the benchmarks and it makes it hard to gauge where the performance gains are. Granted I have an EVGA GTX 780ti SuperClocked card and the reference model is a bit under the performance of that. It may have been useful to also include the 970 in these benchmarks but overall, nice job guys. Thanks a lot!

  8. #40
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    96
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • canopus72's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus sabretooth X58
      • CPU:
      • I7-960
      • Memory:
      • 12GB Kingston HyperX @1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 6TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 560 Ti SOC
      • PSU:
      • coolermaster gold 1200watt
      • Case:
      • CM HAF932
      • Operating System:
      • W7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Philips 234EL

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    A review by Tech USA said that the Titan-X delivers only 30FPS on Crysis3 (very high settings). So that is very disappointing, probably due to GDDR5 being the bottleneck. I am disappointed with this review in that the Titan-X was not compared against the 295X2. It would be very interesting to test the AMD flagship gpu against the Nvidia flagship gpu.

  9. #41
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    1,340
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    94 times in 80 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus somethingorother
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    Quote Originally Posted by SDG Stryker View Post
    Thank you for actually including the GTX 780ti in this. More and more, I am finding reviews that are not included "last" generation's top tier cards in the benchmarks and it makes it hard to gauge where the performance gains are. Granted I have an EVGA GTX 780ti SuperClocked card and the reference model is a bit under the performance of that. It may have been useful to also include the 970 in these benchmarks but overall, nice job guys. Thanks a lot!
    Well said. It's absolutely retarded that it isn't mandatory to include at least 3 generations back. Doesn't need to be on the main graph as it could swamp the view, but at least have a selection box. Knowing how it performs against its current rival is all well and good, but pretty much everybody in the world at all times wants to know how it performs against their current card to see if it's worth upgrading!

  10. #42
    Ryzen Master race outwar6010's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Londinium
    Posts
    1,965
    Thanks
    429
    Thanked
    240 times in 160 posts
    • outwar6010's system
      • Motherboard:
      • asus Crosshair x370
      • CPU:
      • 1800x @ 4ghz
      • Memory:
      • Team Group Dark Pro Edition 16GB (2X8GB) DDR4 PC4-25600C14 3200MHZ
      • Storage:
      • More than most
      • Graphics card(s):
      • evga 1080ti
      • PSU:
      • corsair ax 760
      • Case:
      • Corsair 900d
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10 pro 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • hp omen 32
      • Internet:
      • Bt infinite

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    11.5gb of vram confirmed?
    "A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in."


  11. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    146
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts

    Re: Reviews - Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB

    After 3.5=4, NVidia loses some precision again.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •