Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Sapphire FirePro W9100

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Sapphire FirePro W9100

    AMD's premier workstation card examined.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • sertin12's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS M5A99FX PRO R2.0 ATX
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Vengance 1600
      • Storage:
      • 120gb samsung 840 evo SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • TBA (decideing on it atm)
      • PSU:
      • corsair RM 850w
      • Case:
      • NZXT Phantom 410
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 ASUS 28in monitors (i forget exact product name)
      • Internet:
      • on board gigabit ethernet

    Re: Sapphire FirePro W9100

    So basically what I got out of this review is that programs that are still more optimized for CUDA have the M6000 in the lead and those that actually use Open CL and do it well the W9100 kicks ass, basically AMD cards are far more powerful then Nvidea cards for compute performance Open CL just hasn't matured yet still.

  3. #3
    Team HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,396
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked
    411 times in 217 posts

    Re: Sapphire FirePro W9100

    Yup, that about sums it up, sertin12.

  4. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    56
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • mapesdhs's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock P55 Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • i7 870 @ 4270MHz (203.3 x 21)
      • Memory:
      • Mushkin Blackline 4GB (2x2) DDR3/2030
      • Storage:
      • 60GB OCZ Vertex2 + 1TB SATA (Spinpoint F3)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2 x EVGA GTX 460 1GB FTW SLI
      • PSU:
      • Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Win7/U/64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP 24" LP2475W
      • Internet:
      • 20Mbit

    Re: Sapphire FirePro W9100

    Most of the tests which have the M6000 in the lead (Viewperf) are not using CUDA. It's just OGL acceleration, etc. The bigger problem for Viewperf is the issue of optimisation over time, eg. results from other tests can be different, though it's an issue for both vendors.

    However, where OCL and CUDA are compared for the same test, CUDA still often comes out ahead on the M6000, it's just a lot more mature (see the ratGPU data on this link):

    http://www.tomsitpro.com/articles/nvidia-quadro-m6000,2-898-2.html

    Where the FirePro wins hands down though is for OCL FP64 (eg. Monte Carlo Option Pricing).

    So it's not just an issue about compute acceleration, in many cases the OGL drivers and basic speed are simply better on NV atm, but this sort of thing bounces back & forth over time. Still, I'd prefer NV overall, keep finding they have better drivers.

    Ian.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    15 times in 9 posts
    • nitro912gr's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabretooth 990FX R2.0
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II x6 1090T
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB Kingstone Beast 2133Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 850 250GB, 2x WD Caviar Black 640GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon 7850 DD 1GB
      • PSU:
      • XFX ProSeries 450W Core Edition
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster N300
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2313HM

    Re: Sapphire FirePro W9100

    thanks for this review, is really hard to find PRO card review around the net.
    But... I would love to see some consumer/gaming class cards along the pro ones.

    Also I have being wondering what is the purpose of anything below the W7XXX range because they seem like they can only driver more monitors than doing anything else. Or at least this is the picture I have from older reviews. If you are about to get a small quadro or firepro, just get a high end gaming card and you are fine.

  6. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    56
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • mapesdhs's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock P55 Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • i7 870 @ 4270MHz (203.3 x 21)
      • Memory:
      • Mushkin Blackline 4GB (2x2) DDR3/2030
      • Storage:
      • 60GB OCZ Vertex2 + 1TB SATA (Spinpoint F3)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2 x EVGA GTX 460 1GB FTW SLI
      • PSU:
      • Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Win7/U/64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP 24" LP2475W
      • Internet:
      • 20Mbit

    Re: Sapphire FirePro W9100

    nitro912gr writes:
    > If you are about to get a small quadro or firepro, just get a high end gaming card and you are fine.

    It's not as simple as that. There are reliability, support, heat and other issues which may mean using a gamer card is a bad idea. If these don't matter though, then a gamer card can be an alternative. Mind you, used Quadro cards can be a bargain way to gain access to better quality pro performance & features, eg. recently I obtained a K5000 for just a little over 200 UKP.

    Ian.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •