Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 22 of 22

Thread: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

  1. #17
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    I would argue that with many games also have an automatic "best settings" thing you can activate,which probably drop the resolution and settings. I think a lower resolution setting will be a useful data point./
    That's true actually - fair point. The plug it and play drivers from AMD and nVidia both contain 'optimisation' features these days - I presume activated by default/easily? I've not gone near them so don't know.

  2. #18
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    That's true actually - fair point. The plug it and play drivers from AMD and nVidia both contain 'optimisation' features these days - I presume activated by default/easily? I've not gone near them so don't know.
    That and games do have auto-detect settings too.

  3. #19
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,160
    Thanks
    297
    Thanked
    188 times in 147 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus TUF B450M-plus
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @ 3.2 Gt/s
      • Storage:
      • Crucial P5 1TB (boot), Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Fractal Design ION+ 560P
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    the quality of the bundled coolers will have a much bigger effect on temperatures, and the new AMD cooler looks a lot more promising than the extruded intel tat. Noise level measurements would be nice also, as you normally do for GPU tests

  4. #20
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,176
    Thanks
    3,121
    Thanked
    3,173 times in 1,922 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    I have recently built a dual core AMD APU system for my missus.... and it's very good all round VFM build.

    I think that these AMD cpu's are going to be a great upgrade route for people like myself who have already got one and now would like Quad and more GPU power

    If however it's a new build then Intel pretty much stonk it unless you're playing older games with no discreet card.....
    hey... that's my wife too.

    The market for this with default cooler is, frankly, realistic. Yes I could spend £20 on a new cooler... or spend the £20 on a better cpu to start with.

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  5. #21
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by Zak33 View Post
    I have recently built a dual core AMD APU system for my missus.... and it's very good all round VFM build.

    I think that these AMD cpu's are going to be a great upgrade route for people like myself who have already got one and now would like Quad and more GPU power

    If however it's a new build then Intel pretty much stonk it unless you're playing older games with no discreet card.....
    hey... that's my wife too.

    The market for this with default cooler is, frankly, realistic. Yes I could spend £20 on a new cooler... or spend the £20 on a better cpu to start with.
    But if the overall performance in the tasks relevant to the usage of the device is comparable, would the bundled cooler impact your decision? (for me it would)

  6. #22
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,176
    Thanks
    3,121
    Thanked
    3,173 times in 1,922 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit View Post
    But if the overall performance in the tasks relevant to the usage of the device is comparable, would the bundled cooler impact your decision? (for me it would)
    it is was good enough it would be fine and it's part of the choice.

    Example: this little A4 5300 Dual core at 3.4 on default cooler is near silent and therefore it's "cost" is real in the review sense.

    but some of the AMD stuff is under heat-sinked (Octa springs to mind) and then the £20 upgrade required is paramount on a budget system which we are on this subject really I think

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •