Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 22

Thread: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    26,935
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,661 times in 577 posts

    AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Battle at sub-£100.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Third Foundation
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    99 times in 91 posts

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    So you've tested an overclockable chip focused on graphics in a non-overclocked state against an unoverclockable chip focused on CPU power?

    The integrated graphics results are interesting, but the rest of the article doesn't seem to have been thought through very well.

    For me the most interesting comparison would have been against the other GPU focused £90-100 options. i.e. a £30-40 Haswell/Skylake Celeron or Pentium and a £60 GT 730 GDDR5. How much CPU performance, if any, do you lose? How do the graphics compare?

  3. #3
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    10,968
    Thanks
    1,339
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 792 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z77 Pro4-M
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570 (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Crucial DDR3 1866MHz
      • Storage:
      • 240GB Crucial M4, 480GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate SSHD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • XFX 650W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2913WM & Philips E-line 234EL2SB
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by EndlessWaves View Post
    So you've tested an overclockable chip focused on graphics in a non-overclocked state against an unoverclockable chip focused on CPU power?
    They have compared chips from different companies that come in at a similar price point. Both chips have IGP and multiple cores.

    You're over-thinking the purpose of the article.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    171
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    9 times in 7 posts

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    The memory frequency is a weird one. My MSI mobo says it will only support 2133mhz, however the board and the 7870k actually support 2400mhz (which is currently running perfectly as I'm typing). The memory is limited via BIOS. I flashed my BIOS and could no longer run at 2400mhz so I quickly rolled back and re-gained performance.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,061
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    39 times in 38 posts

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Would have liked to have seen some overclocked figures especially with the new heat sink and fan. Every CPU I buy normally includes a £15-£20 cooler by default.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    15 times in 9 posts
    • nitro912gr's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabretooth 990FX R2.0
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II x6 1090T
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB Kingstone Beast 2133Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 850 250GB, 2x WD Caviar Black 640GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon 7850 DD 1GB
      • PSU:
      • XFX ProSeries 450W Core Edition
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster N300
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2313HM

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    I could love to see some applications performance in those reviews, like how the CPU can handle photoshop and other pro apps.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    MOMBASA
    Posts
    774
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    19 times in 18 posts

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    who needs extra single core performance? AMD A10-7860 Rules, those extra FPS are what consumers on a budget need.

  8. #8
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    8,571
    Thanks
    379
    Thanked
    842 times in 718 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 660GB Linux, 500GB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 24 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by lumireleon View Post
    who needs extra single core performance? AMD A10-7860 Rules, those extra FPS are what consumers on a budget need.
    By the looks of the few benchmarks that have turned up, the Athlon X4 845 has quite a bit of extra single core performance. I look forward to seeing what the socket AM4 version of Carrizo can do!

  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Limerick
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • Ogami's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte A88XM -HD3
      • CPU:
      • AMD Athlon X4 860k
      • Memory:
      • Kingston Fury X
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix R9 380
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 500W 80+ bronze
      • Case:
      • Zalman MS800 plus

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    I feel like I'm missing out after buying the 7850k a couple weeks back :/

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland
    Posts
    119
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Testing games in 720p would be more revealing for integrated graphics.
    The more you live, less you die. More you play, more you die. Isn't it great.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    MOMBASA
    Posts
    774
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    19 times in 18 posts

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    the major problem with AMD is the confusing chipsets and sockets

  12. #12
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,303
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked
    91 times in 78 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • i5 4690K @stock
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX100 512GB, 2TB storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 150 mb fibre

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Can we please have a review of the 845? A review comparing equivalent priced systems would be interesting as well - say £200 worth of motherboard, ram, cpu (and GPU if the budget can fit it) from intel and AMD, then see who comes out on top, since intel motherboards are frequently more expensive than AMD ones

    ETA: A88 boards go for £40ish, while Z170 boards like the one used start at £80ish
    Last edited by Xlucine; 15-04-2016 at 05:38 PM.

  13. #13
    AKA daniel.phillips Sprite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,234
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    47 times in 38 posts

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by darcotech View Post
    Testing games in 720p would be more revealing for integrated graphics.
    I feel the same, not sure many people would play the latest games at 1080p on integrated graphics? Much more likely to have a cheaper monitor or adjust resolution down.

    It would have been nice to see some info on temperatures as well, unless I'm being really stupid I couldn't see any mention of it.
    Main - Intel Core i5 2300 @ 3.5GHz, 8GB DDR3 1333Mhz RAM, Asus P8P67 Pro, Coolermaster iGreen 600w, GTX 480, Antec One Case



  14. #14
    Senior Member kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    28,601
    Thanks
    1,402
    Thanked
    2,814 times in 2,288 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 950
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD7870
      • PSU:
      • XFX Pro 650W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprite View Post
    I feel the same, not sure many people would play the latest games at 1080p on integrated graphics? Much more likely to have a cheaper monitor or adjust resolution down.
    I'm not so sure - I tend to think people gaming on intergrated graphics are ones just gaming on the PC out of the box with no fiddling with things, and as such, are probably quite high in number. So it'll be whatever resolution is native to their monitor. True, there are still some 720p displays out there, but I think most people buy 1080p now. (Steam hardware survey might be quite useful here).

    It would have been nice to see some info on temperatures as well, unless I'm being really stupid I couldn't see any mention of it.
    Good point, but you can see power usage, which equates to the same thing ultimately.

  15. #15
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    10,968
    Thanks
    1,339
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 792 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z77 Pro4-M
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570 (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Crucial DDR3 1866MHz
      • Storage:
      • 240GB Crucial M4, 480GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate SSHD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • XFX 650W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2913WM & Philips E-line 234EL2SB
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    Good point, but you can see power usage, which equates to the same thing ultimately.
    Kind of, but as we have seen with recent Intel chips, poor quality TIM under the heatspreader can affect the transfer of heat to the cooler. Realistically this is only a significant issue if you are overclocking or constructing in an environment that can be starved of airflow (ITX cases for example) but the construction of the chip package can play a factor into the temperature as a separate variable to the power usage.

  16. #16
    Comrade Moose CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    27,373
    Thanks
    3,003
    Thanked
    4,186 times in 3,242 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD A10-7860K vs Intel Core i3-6100

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    I'm not so sure - I tend to think people gaming on intergrated graphics are ones just gaming on the PC out of the box with no fiddling with things, and as such, are probably quite high in number. So it'll be whatever resolution is native to their monitor. True, there are still some 720p displays out there, but I think most people buy 1080p now. (Steam hardware survey might be quite useful here).

    Good point, but you can see power usage, which equates to the same thing ultimately.
    I would argue that with many games also have an automatic "best settings" thing you can activate,which probably drop the resolution and settings. I think a lower resolution setting will be a useful data point./


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •