Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 29

Thread: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    Unleash the deca-core beast!
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    30,928
    Thanks
    1,843
    Thanked
    3,354 times in 2,696 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    How disappointing I guess there *may* be some kind of justification in getting this top of the line one due to the extra cores (if for some reason you're stuck in a single chip environment) but it looks like the rest of the line won't be any improvement over ye olde Haswell-E.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    273
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • Badbonji's system
      • Motherboard:
      • GIGABYTE G1.Sniper M3
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 3770k 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB TeamElite 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256GB M4 SSD + 150GB Raptor
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 980
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850+ Rev. 2
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 24" 1920x1200 + LG 32" 1080P TV
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2 76/19Mbps

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    In the testing methodology table, you have put 10/20 cores/threads for the 5960X (instead of 8/16).

  4. #4
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    30,928
    Thanks
    1,843
    Thanked
    3,354 times in 2,696 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    Hexus, are you sure about this bit?

    Quote Originally Posted by hexus
    For reasons that still remain a mystery, Intel decided to hamstring the Core i7-5820K, for gamers at least, by limiting the number of PCIe lanes emanating from the processor from the usual roster of 40 down to 28. The same mistake is not made on the Core i7-6800K, which retains all 40 lanes, meaning its $412 renders the next chip up, the 6850K, moot for the savvy purchaser.
    Other reviews I've read say the 6800k is cut to 28 again:

    Quote Originally Posted by anandtech
    When Intel introduced Haswell-E, it experimented with a new type of product separation: it also varied the number of CPU-host PCIe lanes among the SKUs. This practice continues in Broadwell-E, in an almost identical fashion. The lowest end CPU has 28 PCIe 3.0 lanes, capable of three-way GPU setups (and no 2x16 setups), while the other processors have a full 40 PCIe 3.0 lanes, allowing for four-way GPU setups or different combinations therein.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    120
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts
    • YazX's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.5 Ghz
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Tactical Tracer DDR3 16 GB
      • Storage:
      • 128 GB Samsung SSD, 256 GB Crucial SSD, 4 TB Caviar Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 980 Ti FTW
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNova G1 1000W
      • Case:
      • CM Haf-X
      • Operating System:
      • W10 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Qnix 27" 2560x1440
      • Internet:
      • 16 Mbps

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    Hexus, are you sure about this bit?
    you are right, the 6800k has 28 PCIEx lanes.

  6. #6
    Anti-Viral Pleiades's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Amongst barbarians
    Posts
    957
    Thanks
    1,837
    Thanked
    61 times in 49 posts
    • Pleiades's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z-97 Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • 4690K @ 4GHz / Phanteks TC-12DX
      • Memory:
      • 16 GiB HyperX
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk 480GiB; Transcend M.2 256GiB; Velociraptor 300GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Pulse RX580 8GiB
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet Straight Power 800w
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster HAF932
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC 31.5" WQHD 144Hz; Samsung 49" 9500 HDR UHD TV
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 50 Mibs

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    I doubt Intel intended this for gamers somehow...
    ------------------

    Valar Morghulis

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland
    Posts
    374
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    26 times in 15 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    I would like to see this in my DEV PC, when running a build, my CPU is at 100% for some time (i5-2500K).
    This could help me...now,where do I find that 1723USD ... :-)
    The more you live, less you die. More you play, more you die. Isn't it great.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    240
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts
    • davesom555's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock B450M
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2600@4ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair 3000mhz
      • Storage:
      • 500gb Samsung 970 Evo NVME + multiple 2.5" SSDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Vega 56 Pulse
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 700w
      • Case:
      • NZXT H400i mATX
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 27" QHD 144mhz
      • Internet:
      • 200mb

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    Looks like intel ARK confirms the 28 lanes also...

    http://ark.intel.com/products/94189/...up-to-3_60-GHz

  9. Received thanks from:

    kalniel (31-05-2016)

  10. #9
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    30,928
    Thanks
    1,843
    Thanked
    3,354 times in 2,696 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pleiades View Post
    I doubt Intel intended this for gamers somehow...
    You'd be wrong..



    https://www-ssl.intel.com/content/ww...us-gaming.html

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sunny Bracknell
    Posts
    1,713
    Thanks
    109
    Thanked
    99 times in 93 posts
    • dfour's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Crosshair 8 Hero wifi
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 7 3700x
      • Memory:
      • 16gb Dark pro @3600
      • Storage:
      • sabrent and wd nvme + 3 TB storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Vega 64 Strix water cooled
      • PSU:
      • Fractal design Ion+ 760p
      • Case:
      • Lian Li 011D custom water cooled
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC agon 32" + Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • Zen Fibre @72 meg

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    If you look at the games performance you would see its utterly pointless. Just buy a 6700K and a better GPU and still have money left.

    Render monster, gaming pointless.

  12. Received thanks from:

    Pleiades (31-05-2016)

  13. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,207
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked
    114 times in 102 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    Performance as expected to be honest but that price is a complete and utter joke.

    Seriously for the people that truly need/want 10 cores (ie 3D rendering, video editting etc) most programs now offer network rendering so you can pool rigs together so based on the listed price of nearly £1400 you can buy 2x 6 core machines and have MORE performance for the price of 1x 10 core machine.... yeah you need more desk space and it uses more power but I know which way I'll be going.

    The only thing we can hope for now is that Zen really does have similar performance and it brings the prices down.

  14. #12
    Anti-Viral Pleiades's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Amongst barbarians
    Posts
    957
    Thanks
    1,837
    Thanked
    61 times in 49 posts
    • Pleiades's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z-97 Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • 4690K @ 4GHz / Phanteks TC-12DX
      • Memory:
      • 16 GiB HyperX
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk 480GiB; Transcend M.2 256GiB; Velociraptor 300GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Pulse RX580 8GiB
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet Straight Power 800w
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster HAF932
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC 31.5" WQHD 144Hz; Samsung 49" 9500 HDR UHD TV
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 50 Mibs

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    Blimey, I guess they're not over-estimating gamer's intelligence then
    ------------------

    Valar Morghulis

  15. #13
    Anti-Viral Pleiades's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Amongst barbarians
    Posts
    957
    Thanks
    1,837
    Thanked
    61 times in 49 posts
    • Pleiades's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z-97 Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • 4690K @ 4GHz / Phanteks TC-12DX
      • Memory:
      • 16 GiB HyperX
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk 480GiB; Transcend M.2 256GiB; Velociraptor 300GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Pulse RX580 8GiB
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet Straight Power 800w
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster HAF932
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC 31.5" WQHD 144Hz; Samsung 49" 9500 HDR UHD TV
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 50 Mibs

    Exclamation Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pleiades View Post
    I doubt Intel intended this for gamers somehow...
    Having said that:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/10382/...d-gtx-1080-gpu
    ------------------

    Valar Morghulis

  16. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Kingdom O Fife
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    15 times in 13 posts
    • zaph0d's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X570-A Pro
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
      • Memory:
      • 48GB - 2X 32GB and 2X 16GB at 3200
      • Storage:
      • 480GB NVME (OS) 2TB 8 Drive sas Raid0 (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Geforce 1070
      • PSU:
      • 1000W Coolermaster
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-343B (Original Model)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2X 55" Samsung 4k tv's
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 500Mb

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    I guess I'll be keeping my xeon-5650x hex-core @ 4.0GHz for another generation or two then.
    While a newer chip would arguably provide more cores, with relatively few exceptions 4 is about as much as most programs can leverage. This leaves me with an additional 2 cores.
    While there is a 10% per-clock improvement from arch to arch, that puts my chip about 20-25% per clock slower than this latest beast. Meaning that @ 4GHz I'll gain mothing without overclocking anyway and thus puts my chip as leading performance above mainstream levels required for gaming.
    Also with DirectX-12 purported to be more multi-core friendly I'll be ably to use my 2 additional cores to increase my performance to meet/exceed the current Sky/Kaby-Lake quadcore mainstream.
    And intel have the gall to charge these kinds of exorbitant prices for cores that are already over 1 generation and architechture behind and lagging fast - against chips that they released half a decade ago that are available almost free on eBay that perform equally well?

    Yeah I'll wait until either another Amd Athlon-64 moment causing intel to pull another Core-Number-Numeral outta their rear or wait until my current chip either dies or is less than 75% of a non-overclocked mainstream chip.

  17. Received thanks from:

    Pleiades (31-05-2016)

  18. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    327
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    26 times in 20 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    This one isn't meant for normal gamers, it's for streamers and gamers that do video editing. Having 6 extra cores makes a huge difference for those purposes. Any other gamer should be perfectly served with the 6 core version for the next 5 years.

  19. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,061
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    39 times in 38 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-6950X (14nm Broadwell)

    It's a £1500 desktop chip...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •