Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 37

Thread: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    20 per cent cheaper than the 1800X and almost every bit as good.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,824
    Thanks
    3,838
    Thanked
    5,125 times in 3,954 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Also a note to perspective buyers - the people over on XS forums tested the various models. At the same voltages the R7 1700 consumes less power than a R7 1700X or R7 1800X.

    This hints that the R7 1700 is a lower leakage chip according to them and will be the better buy for most people. At least for a lot of non-gaming work the Core i7 6900K looks massively overpriced.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Newcastle Upon Tyne
    Posts
    936
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    105 times in 72 posts
    • Jowsey's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock H81M-ITX
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon E3-1230V3
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair XMS3
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Crucial MX100 & 2TB Seagate Barracuda
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX 770 DCUII 2GB
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNova GS 550 watt
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Evolv ITX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64 bit
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 100Mb

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    As far as I'm concerned, I reel like this review, of the 1700x, has successfully sold a lot of 1700's!

    Super interesting looking scaling!

  4. #4
    Be wary of Scan Dashers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    1,079
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked
    137 times in 107 posts
    • Dashers's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-5930K
      • Memory:
      • 48GB Corsair DDR4 3000 Quad-channel
      • Storage:
      • Intel 750 PCIe SSD; RAID-0 x2 Samsung 840 EVO; RAID-0 x2 WD Black; RAID-0 x2 Crucial MX500
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
      • PSU:
      • CoolerMaster Silent Pro M2 720W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 500R
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Philips 40" 4K AMVA + 23.8" AOC 144Hz IPS
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTTC

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Well at a couple of hundred quid cheaper than my 5930K it looks like much better value for money. Although I was somehow hoping for more.

    All academic for me as it's a good few years until I'll be upgrading again.

  5. #5
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,824
    Thanks
    3,838
    Thanked
    5,125 times in 3,954 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jowsey View Post
    As far as I'm concerned, I reel like this review, of the 1700x, has successfully sold a lot of 1700's!

    Super interesting looking scaling!
    The R7 1700 is the star - it consumes less power at 4GHZ apparently than a R7 1700X or R7 1800X.

  6. #6
    <Insert witty one liner> Kanoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    941
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked
    99 times in 72 posts
    • Kanoe's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING II
      • CPU:
      • Intel 7960X (4.4GHZ All Core)
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance PRO (4 x 8GB) 3200
      • Storage:
      • 1x 2TB M.2, 2x 1TB M.2, 960GB SSD, 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nvidia 3080 FE (1965MHz @906mV +1500 VRAM)
      • PSU:
      • Superflower 1200W
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Primo v2
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 28" ASUS PB287Q 4k + 24" Dell U2412M
      • Internet:
      • Sky @ 60/20

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Hexus - how good was the XFR? did it mean that it was boosting to the same level as the 1800X when it was boosting too or did it come in lower even with the same cooler?

  7. #7
    Dark side super agent
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Nirvana
    Posts
    1,895
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked
    99 times in 89 posts

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    I've obviously missed the briefing. I'm seeing "XFR" bandied about all the time - what is it?
    An Atlantean Triumvirate, Ghosts of the Past, The Centre Cannot Hold
    The Pillars of Britain, Foundations of the Reich, Cracks in the Pillars.

    My books are available here for Amazon Kindle. Feedback always welcome!

  8. #8
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,824
    Thanks
    3,838
    Thanked
    5,125 times in 3,954 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Quote Originally Posted by Bluecube View Post
    I've obviously missed the briefing. I'm seeing "XFR" bandied about all the time - what is it?
    Its an auto-overclock of upto 200MHZ on the X series and upto 100MHZ on the non-X series.

  9. Received thanks from:

    Bluecube (03-03-2017)

  10. #9
    MCRN Tachi Ttaskmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    6,835
    Thanks
    558
    Thanked
    777 times in 651 posts
    • Ttaskmaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X99-PRO USB 3.1
      • CPU:
      • i7 5960X o/c to 4.6GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer RGB DDR4
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 120GB and Seagate Baracuda 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte G1 GTX980Ti
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 1000W
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Luxe wiv perspex window
      • Operating System:
      • Win10 64 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator XB270HU 1440 IPS GSync 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • 900Mbps Gigaclear WHOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Just been looking at some comparison sites (with pretty pictures and big, bold numbers, because that's about my level of understanding on these things)... but there doesn't look to be that much between this 1700 and my years-old 3930K, at least until you get into the multicore stuff, anyway.
    Higher TDP and a few such, but many of the scores are around the same, or slightly better than the 1700.

    I'm kinda impressed, actually!!

    Certainly won't be adopting Ryzen, at least not just yet. I still need to update my GPU and get a better monitor, but it's good to hear AMD might have started getting at least as good as Intel's current stuff. Last AMD processor I had was a 6350, IIRC... Seems AMD like to stay on the same platform for-EVERRRRRRRRRRRRR, while Intel change theirs faster than the Ttaskmistress changes her mind!!

  11. #10
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,824
    Thanks
    3,838
    Thanked
    5,125 times in 3,954 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ttaskmaster View Post
    Just been looking at some comparison sites (with pretty pictures and big, bold numbers, because that's about my level of understanding on these things)... but there doesn't look to be that much between this 1700 and my years-old 3930K, at least until you get into the multicore stuff, anyway.
    Higher TDP and a few such, but many of the scores are around the same, or slightly better than the 1700.

    I'm kinda impressed, actually!!

    Certainly won't be adopting Ryzen, at least not just yet. I still need to update my GPU and get a better monitor, but it's good to hear AMD might have started getting at least as good as Intel's current stuff. Last AMD processor I had was a 6350, IIRC... Seems AMD like to stay on the same platform for-EVERRRRRRRRRRRRR, while Intel change theirs faster than the Ttaskmistress changes her mind!!
    When it comes to games SMT currently can regress performance quite a bit,so much so you can get 5% to 15% better gaming performance overall.

    So the best is still to come - its a bit of a bummer,but I expect down the line gaming performance will improve.

    For non-gaming stuff,some of the reviews are showing great performance especially under Linux where even a Core i7 6900K or Core i7 6950K is challenged.

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,061
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    39 times in 38 posts

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    8 cores for the price of 4. Don't mind if I do.

  13. #12
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    pretty sad that review companies still focus on single core performance, on a multi core proc. i guess they have to find something negative to say about AMD.

  14. #13
    Yay a custom user title! =assassin='s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    896
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked
    57 times in 39 posts

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    The results are very positive, and certainly look good for situations that require a bigger core count. I'd like better gaming performance ideally, but with patches, and a more mature process, a few months later things may have evened out a little. Thanks for the review!

  15. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    361
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 22 posts
    • anselhelm's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450 Tomahawk Max
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
      • Memory:
      • 2x16GiB Crucial 3600MHz CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD, 1x WD Gold 10TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI RTX 2070 Super w/ Morpheus II
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RM750x
      • Case:
      • Corsair Carbide Air 540
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • MSI OPTIX MAG272QR
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTTC

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Thank you for your sensible QHD (1440P) gaming benchmarks in this review

    A lot of sites have been annoying benchmarking at ridiculously-low resolutions like 640x480 or 800x600 in order to show a massive Intel bias. I wish I were joking here, but sadly I am not: this is what sites have really been doing.

    Other sites have pointed out that AMD is technically "losing" still at 1080P, but that anything above that shows no discernible difference between AMD and Intel processors (even when paired with the highest-end gaming cards available).

    Any chance you could do a review on the cheaper R7 1700 now too?

  16. Received thanks from:

    Phage (04-03-2017)

  17. #15
    Pork & Beans Powerup Phage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    6,260
    Thanks
    1,618
    Thanked
    608 times in 518 posts
    • Phage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Crosshair VIII
      • CPU:
      • 3800x
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb @ 3600Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 960 512Gb + 2Tb Samsung 860
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 1080ti
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 850w
      • Case:
      • Fractal Define 7
      • Operating System:
      • W10 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Iiyama GB3461WQSU-B1

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Quote Originally Posted by anselhelm View Post
    Thank you for your sensible QHD (1440P) gaming benchmarks in this review

    A lot of sites have been annoying benchmarking at ridiculously-low resolutions like 640x480 or 800x600 in order to show a massive Intel bias. I wish I were joking here, but sadly I am not: this is what sites have really been doing.

    Other sites have pointed out that AMD is technically "losing" still at 1080P, but that anything above that shows no discernible difference between AMD and Intel processors (even when paired with the highest-end gaming cards available).

    Any chance you could do a review on the cheaper R7 1700 now too?
    This. I'd really like to see an OC'd 1700 with at least an 1080 at 1440p in BF1 against a 6700k and a 7700k
    Society's to blame,
    Or possibly Atari.

  18. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    403
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked
    79 times in 68 posts
    • Firejack's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus PRIME X470-Pro
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
      • Memory:
      • TG Dark Pro "8pack Edition"
      • Storage:
      • Crucial 250GB SSD, Sandisk 128GB SSD, Samsung 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire RX VEGA 56 8GB Pulse
      • PSU:
      • SeaSonic Focus Plus 650 Gold
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define S
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2719DGF
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2

    Re: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (14nm Zen)

    Quote Originally Posted by anselhelm View Post
    Thank you for your sensible QHD (1440P) gaming benchmarks in this review

    A lot of sites have been annoying benchmarking at ridiculously-low resolutions like 640x480 or 800x600 in order to show a massive Intel bias. I wish I were joking here, but sadly I am not: this is what sites have really been doing.

    Other sites have pointed out that AMD is technically "losing" still at 1080P, but that anything above that shows no discernible difference between AMD and Intel processors (even when paired with the highest-end gaming cards available).

    .....
    We learn very little about CPU performance by benching in GPU-limited scenarios. I agree that 640x480 is irrelevant as next to nobody uses those resolutions anymore. However 1080p should always be included in any gaming bench. 1080p accounts for 43.23% of Steam users while 1440p is only 1.81% (http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey).

    We need results for 1080p and 1440p because it will show CPU performance clearly when you compare the two. By only including 1440p in this review we don't know what to expect when we upgrade our graphics cards. The GTX 1080 Ti is out now. If we swapped one of those with the GTX 1080 in this test suite we would see a clearer difference in CPU performance as the GPU bottleneck is lifted.

    And thats what we need to know in this Ryzen 7 1700X review - CPU performance in real world gaming scenarios.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •