Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 33

Thread: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    A Titan X in all but name?
    Read more.

  2. Received thanks from:

    virtuo (09-03-2017)

  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Worksop
    Posts
    149
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    15 times in 13 posts
    • KrisWragg's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock X370 Taichi
      • CPU:
      • AMD 1700X @ 3.7Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • 500GB 950 Evo + 500GB 850 Evo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • R9 290 @ 1.1Ghz
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Platinum 660W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define S
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell U2713HM
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 78mbit down / 20mbit up

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Wish AMD would hurry up with Vega! This is a beast of a graphics card though, I wish I had a 4k screen so I could justify buying one of these!

    Currently my 290 is still holding up well at 1080p on a TV and 1440p on my monitor, need some more demanding games or a higher resolution screen I think.

  4. #3
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,842
    Thanks
    3,839
    Thanked
    5,132 times in 3,958 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    LOL,this it is faster than a Titan X and draws the same power.

  5. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    3 times in 2 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    "A Titan in all but name"....and price. Shows what a con the Titan X is.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    142
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    9 times in 9 posts
    • 3s-gtech's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X4 945 @ 3.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • 120GB Samsung 850 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD HD 6870 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Antec 550W
      • Case:
      • Antec Sonata II
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 2032BW

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Doom:
    "Even the Radeon Fury X manages well in excess of 100 frames per second at the 4K test"

    60fps.

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    400
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    46 times in 39 posts
    • iworrall's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus B350M TUF Gaming
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 2700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB C14 Team Group "Dark Pro"
      • Storage:
      • 512Gb Samsung 970 Evo NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia RTX3080 FE
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 1KW
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core V21
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 / Kubuntu 19.04
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator X34A
      • Internet:
      • Sky Fibre

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    I like the removal of the DVI connector, it gives the potential to go "single slot" if watercooling.

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    17 times in 17 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Still waiting for Vega...

  9. #8
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    1,340
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    94 times in 80 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus somethingorother
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    How underwhelming. I hyped it up in my mind so much I was expecting way more. Dunno why as I should have just looked at X benchmarks.

    If the AIO models come in at £700 I'll buy one. But can't see that happening. Might just get a 1080 and SLI the bugger.

  10. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    99
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • meuvoy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97-G45
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 4460
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Kingston 1866Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Adata 128GB SSD + 1,7TB HDD (inTotal)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia Geforce GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 750B2
      • Case:
      • Cougar 6GR1 Evolution
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 29" 21:9 Philips Brilliance 298P4QJEB

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Nice, but does those new 378.78 drivers really (I mean really) deliver more performance on DX12? Cuz if it doesn't then I think I'll buy an AMD card next time around, doesn't matter how much Tis Nvidia rubbishrubbishrubbishrubbish around.

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    863
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    38 times in 30 posts
    • rob4001's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte z97
      • CPU:
      • Xeon 1231 v3
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 256GB SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 1660 super
      • PSU:
      • Sliverstone 500w SFX-L
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG13 mitx
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Comcast 75MB

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    How big is the market for these cards?

  12. #11
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    30,928
    Thanks
    1,843
    Thanked
    3,354 times in 2,696 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Quote Originally Posted by rob4001 View Post
    How big is the market for these cards?
    Given it's the same price as the 1080 was at launch, I'd say the same size as that at least

  13. Received thanks from:

    CAT-THE-FIFTH (09-03-2017)

  14. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    281
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked
    15 times in 11 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Quote Originally Posted by rob4001 View Post
    How big is the market for these cards?
    The Ti cards always seem to be very popular. Many people will have waited for it.

  15. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    570
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    37 times in 31 posts
    • EvilCycle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS ROG MAXIMUS IX HERO
      • CPU:
      • Intel I7 7700K (OC to 4.8GHz on Corsair H100i V2)
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @ 3000MHz
      • Storage:
      • WD Blue SN550 1TB NVMe SSD, Samsung 840 evo 120GB SSD + 2 x 500GB 72000rpm HDD's
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 XTREME
      • PSU:
      • DEEPCOOL DQ 750st
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian Series 750D Airflow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" 1440p 60hz AOC q2778vqe
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 380Mb (Fibre Optic)

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Very nice card indeed, not planning to go 4k for the foreseeable though so I think the 1070 will be enough for my needs for a while. I think once 4k is the mainstream standard I will look at it again, although I am sure there will be far better cards out by then too

    I do feel sorry for the folks who bought a 1080 or titan very recently not realizing this was coming!

  16. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    361
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 22 posts
    • anselhelm's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450 Tomahawk Max
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
      • Memory:
      • 2x16GiB Crucial 3600MHz CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD, 1x WD Gold 10TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI RTX 2070 Super w/ Morpheus II
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RM750x
      • Case:
      • Corsair Carbide Air 540
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • MSI OPTIX MAG272QR
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTTC

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    "Not full implementation of GP102"

    Thank you!

    I posted something about that on Ars and got downvoted to oblivion, probably by zealous Nvidia fans or people who didn't properly read my post.

    I simply do not believe that yields can be so low on GP102 now that Nvidia cannot release a "full-fat" GP102 implementation with 3840 shaders (30 blocks enabled instead of just 28) along with the max number of texture units (I think that'd be 240) and ROPs (96 I presume, unless they go beyond a 384-bit memory bus).

    As such, once again it feels like Nvidia is deliberately holding back just so it can release a new Titan X (or whatever) for the same >$1000+ price tag and claim it's still the enthusiast's hero. What's worse is that people still defend Nvidia for these kind of practices, just like how people defend Intel!

    I really, really hope that AMD isn't going to drop the ball with Vega or price it above Nvidia, just so that Nvidia has to actually compete a bit again. When there's no competition, we'll still get faster products, but they won't be as fast or as cheap as they should be.

  17. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    1,849
    Thanks
    165
    Thanked
    271 times in 202 posts
    • virtuo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Aorus Master X570
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 9 5950x
      • Memory:
      • 64Gb G.Skill TridentZ Neo 3600 CL16
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent 2TB PCIE4 NVME + NAS upon NAS upon NAS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RTX 3090 FE
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850 80+ Platinum
      • Case:
      • Fractal Meshify 2 Grey
      • Operating System:
      • RedStar 3, Ubuntu, Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung CRG90 5140x1440 120hz
      • Internet:
      • PlusNet's best, but still poor, attempt

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    Quote Originally Posted by anselhelm View Post
    "Not full implementation of GP102"

    Thank you!

    I posted something about that on Ars and got downvoted to oblivion, probably by zealous Nvidia fans or people who didn't properly read my post.

    I simply do not believe that yields can be so low on GP102 now that Nvidia cannot release a "full-fat" GP102 implementation with 3840 shaders (30 blocks enabled instead of just 28) along with the max number of texture units (I think that'd be 240) and ROPs (96 I presume, unless they go beyond a 384-bit memory bus).

    As such, once again it feels like Nvidia is deliberately holding back just so it can release a new Titan X (or whatever) for the same >$1000+ price tag and claim it's still the enthusiast's hero. What's worse is that people still defend Nvidia for these kind of practices, just like how people defend Intel!

    I really, really hope that AMD isn't going to drop the ball with Vega or price it above Nvidia, just so that Nvidia has to actually compete a bit again. When there's no competition, we'll still get faster products, but they won't be as fast or as cheap as they should be.
    I think they just want to keep a "better" titan in the barrel, just in case.

    Seems like a good card, but really wouldn't consider a base version without much better thermals.

    And the performance increase doesn't seem anywhere near the "35%" that was claimed. Not that those claims are ever true.

    Still. Want.

  18. #16
    Orbiting The Hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lincoln, UK
    Posts
    1,580
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked
    96 times in 73 posts
    • The Hand's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte AB350 Gaming-3
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4 3200mhz (8GBx2)
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Kingston SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Geforce RTX 2060 Super 8GB Dual Series
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX 520 Modular
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Praetorian
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Sony 32 inch HD TV
      • Internet:
      • 20Mbps Fibre

    Re: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (16nm Pascal)

    What a monster! I hope AMD's big talk with Vega isn't just big talk and with Volta coming too they need to do well. Standard 1080s are falling in price and ebay will be awash with even cheaper 1080s. Just saw a good used 1080 go for the same price as a new 1070. For gamers there's no reason to go for the Titan unless you just like the name!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •