Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 20

Thread: Intel Core i9-9900KS

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    29,010
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,866 times in 639 posts

    Intel Core i9-9900KS

    5 is the magic number.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    15,055
    Thanks
    1,200
    Thanked
    2,249 times in 1,850 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 1x 8GB DDR4 2400
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    So, you take an existing Coffee Lake CPU, pick the best silicon, tweak the stock settings to add > 30W to the base power limit, allow mobo manufacturers to run it as fast as they like, and you end up with a chip that barely scrapes past the 3800X (in MT workloads) whilst consuming 65W more at the wall?

    *slow clap*

  3. Received thanks from:

    neonplanet40 (01-11-2019)

  4. #3
    Hooning about Hoonigan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,070
    Thanks
    142
    Thanked
    377 times in 265 posts
    • Hoonigan's system
      • Motherboard:
      • GIGABYTE X570 AORUS MASTER
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2x 2TB Gigabyte NVMe 4.0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080Ti VENTUS OC
      • PSU:
      • be quiet! Straight Power 11 650W
      • Case:
      • be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator Z35P + ASUS ROG PG279Q
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media Vivid 350

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    Massively underwhelming, though it has to be said, if you're building a gaming machine, nothing beats it.

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    224
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    17 times in 17 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoonigan View Post
    Massively underwhelming, though it has to be said, if you're building a gaming machine, nothing beats it.
    If the only thing you do with your computer is gaming, aren't you better off with a console?

    Anyway... yawns at Intel!

  6. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    If you follow the £515.99 link to Scan the actual price is £549.98.

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    430
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    18 times in 15 posts
    • LeetyMcLeet's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 3770K @ 4.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB (4x4GB) Corsair Vengeance LP 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Sammy 840 Evo (OS), 500GB Sammy 850 Evo (Games) and 4 x 2TB HDD's (Pr0n)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2x GTX 670 2GB (Gigabyte WF3 Overclocked)
      • PSU:
      • beQuiet! SP 680W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design R4 (Black)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS IPS
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity Business (80/20 FTTC)

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    Quote Originally Posted by GinoLatino View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoonigan View Post
    Massively underwhelming, though it has to be said, if you're building a gaming machine, nothing beats it.
    If the only thing you do with your computer is gaming, aren't you better off with a console?

    Anyway... yawns at Intel!

    PLEASE tell me that was sarcasm

  8. #7
    don't stock motherhoods
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,189
    Thanks
    724
    Thanked
    107 times in 92 posts
    • Millennium's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z170 Pro Gamer ATX
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 6600K @ 4.5GHz 4 core
      • Memory:
      • Corsair VPX 3000 DDR4 (16, 4*4)
      • Storage:
      • 500gb 850 Evo sata3 SSD, 2*2TB Green 5900 Raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 390 8gb
      • PSU:
      • toughpower 1kw
      • Case:
      • Zalman Z3 Plus
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • VIEWSONIC VG2401MH 144hz (Solid)
      • Internet:
      • Origin ADSL Broadband, not really recommended.

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    Quote Originally Posted by LeetyMcLeet View Post
    PLEASE tell me that was sarcasm
    I'm seriously considering a PS4 (probably pro) for the living room
    hexus trust : n(baby):n(lover):n(sky)|>P(Name)>>nopes

    how do you spend your time online? (Hexus link)

  9. #8
    Hooning about Hoonigan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,070
    Thanks
    142
    Thanked
    377 times in 265 posts
    • Hoonigan's system
      • Motherboard:
      • GIGABYTE X570 AORUS MASTER
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2x 2TB Gigabyte NVMe 4.0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080Ti VENTUS OC
      • PSU:
      • be quiet! Straight Power 11 650W
      • Case:
      • be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator Z35P + ASUS ROG PG279Q
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media Vivid 350

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    Quote Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
    I'm seriously considering a PS4 (probably pro) for the living room
    If you go the PS4 Pro route, make sure you factor in the price of a 1TB SATA SSD otherwise it won't feel much different to a normal PS4. They're decent but for £600 you could build a much better gaming PC that'd not be much bigger. 2600X, 16GB RAM, GTX 1660, 500GB NVMe, 500w Corsair PSU.

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,492
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked
    198 times in 142 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    What a waste of your time, Tarinder.

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    325
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    10 times in 8 posts
    • Rubarb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI H81m-E33
      • CPU:
      • G3258
      • Memory:
      • 8GB hyper x beast
      • Storage:
      • 120ssd, 2gb hdd
      • Graphics card(s):
      • msi gtx960 4gb
      • PSU:
      • seasonic 450w
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake mozrt tx
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • samsung 24'
      • Internet:
      • 100mb

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    I'd take the ryzen anyday over this

  12. #11
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    29,215
    Thanks
    1,526
    Thanked
    2,938 times in 2,381 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon X5680
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    Certainly underwhelming, which I guess is reflected in price. (Unless you got a 9900K for £400 ).

    However there is an uptick in games - why? Are games so multi-threaded these days that they are chattering away on all the cores of a 9900K so reducing it's freq down to 4.7ghz vs 5ghz of the KS? What's happening in the games situation that makes the 9900KS faster and how many cores would you need to set at 5ghz on a 9900K to have the same effect?

  13. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Central Scotland
    Posts
    449
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    16 times in 11 posts
    • jnutt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSi Z77A GD80
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7
      • Memory:
      • 16gig
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 500gig SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 1070SC
      • PSU:
      • CoolerMaster 750w
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master
      • Operating System:
      • Windows10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 28" and 24"
      • Internet:
      • Cable 300mb

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    So glad I went AMD

  14. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    why don't the Civilization VI results line up ? same scores in places but different places in the scores positions in the results grid. Others look fine just the Civilization VI ones.

  15. #14
    Team HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,329
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked
    344 times in 189 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    Quote Originally Posted by PMMEASURES View Post
    why don't the Civilization VI results line up ? same scores in places but different places in the scores positions in the results grid. Others look fine just the Civilization VI ones.
    That game is massively GPU limited at 4K, meaning that ordinarily lesser CPUs benchmark better than expected. The result to look out for, from a processor perspective, is the FHD.

  16. #15
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    10,162
    Thanks
    516
    Thanked
    1,049 times in 893 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    Quote Originally Posted by Tarinder View Post
    That game is massively GPU limited at 4K, meaning that ordinarily lesser CPUs benchmark better than expected. The result to look out for, from a processor perspective, is the FHD.
    I think the one you really want is the AI benchmark of how long it takes to make a turn. It isn't an FPS sensitive game.

    Edit: The AI test is way more interesting than FPS, as it very much effects gameplay. It plays to the strengths of the 9900K (probably more so if you switch off threading to improve security ), but also shows how AMD have improved since Zen 1. It isn't just GHz though, the 3400G takes a beating in this one. It is a decent benchmark, Hexus should switch.

    Last edited by DanceswithUnix; 01-11-2019 at 04:47 AM.

  17. #16
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    1,115
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    80 times in 70 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2700K
      • Memory:
      • 12GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900KS

    8c/16t is the norm now for the foreseeable future when it comes to gaming, as consoles come first for devs, and I struggle to see any reason to buy this part, or any Intel, at the moment. AMD CPUs are cheaper, AMD motherboards are more future proofed, and because of the lower power usage of Ryzen, you can build a tighter, quieter gaming rig because you don't have to dissipate the ridiculous amounts of watts these Intel chips throw out. It genuinely feels like the only reason anyone would buy this is purely because they fell for the marketing of "fastest CPU for gaming"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •