Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 24

Thread: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    29,254
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,924 times in 668 posts

    Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    The ideal companion for 3rd Gen AMD Ryzen?
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    205
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked
    20 times in 17 posts
    • blokeinkent's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI MPG Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 9700KF s1151 3.6/4.9GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair DDR4 Vengeance LPX Black PC4-25600 (3200)
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 2TB 860 Evo SSD + 250GB 750 Evo SSD + 3x WD 6TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 1070 FTW Gaming ACX 3.0
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX 760
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define S2 (White)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator XB281HK 4K
      • Internet:
      • TalkTalk Faster Fibre +Boost

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    So on Scan 500GB 520 is selling cheaper than the 510. ok

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Quote Originally Posted by blokeinkent View Post
    So on Scan 500GB 520 is selling cheaper than the 510. ok
    Yeah - but watch out for the lower write speed of the 500GB 520 vs the 1TB+ 520s.

  4. #4
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    1,138
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    81 times in 71 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus somethingorother
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    The key selling point, of course, is performance, and peak sequential read and write speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and 4,400MB/s are not to be scoffed at. A near-45 per cent uptick in read performance is reason enough for most enthusiasts to want to upgrade,
    Not true, imo. "Enthusiasts", typically speaking, are the people who still use bang for buck but they use it in crazy places like, M.2 drives, top end graphics cards cases, monitors, etc. They'll spend real money because they feel a real feeling of..accomplishment ? I guess. I suck at words. I should get a thesaurus.

    ANYWHO. My entire point is, no enthusiast is changing their m.2 to one of these. The types of people who do that aren't enthusiasts, they're the show offs, the clowns, the ones who must have the best etc. because yeah it might be faster at read and write in single file performance, but considering that with a current 1tb m.2 (which is literally half the price of this) games open before I click the buttons, and the ones with 4K textures are annoying purely because I have to wait so long for my mates to load in...if you're paying twice as much for what would equate to a nominal amount of performance increase, you're not en enthusiast..you're just a clown.

    Also I bet you drive an Audi

    EDIT: before it's brought up, every reference to media production was purposely left out, as this wouldn't be used for that, as there are better options, done a thousand different better ways with a thousand different budgets. But no bean counter office is ever gonna let you have these for your production server

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    2,759
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    107 times in 90 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    Not true, imo. "Enthusiasts", typically speaking, are the people who still use bang for buck but they use it in crazy places like, M.2 drives, top end graphics cards cases, monitors, etc. They'll spend real money because they feel a real feeling of..accomplishment ? I guess. I suck at words. I should get a thesaurus.

    ANYWHO. My entire point is, no enthusiast is changing their m.2 to one of these. The types of people who do that aren't enthusiasts, they're the show offs, the clowns, the ones who must have the best etc. because yeah it might be faster at read and write in single file performance, but considering that with a current 1tb m.2 (which is literally half the price of this) games open before I click the buttons, and the ones with 4K textures are annoying purely because I have to wait so long for my mates to load in...if you're paying twice as much for what would equate to a nominal amount of performance increase, you're not en enthusiast..you're just a clown.

    Also I bet you drive an Audi

    EDIT: before it's brought up, every reference to media production was purposely left out, as this wouldn't be used for that, as there are better options, done a thousand different better ways with a thousand different budgets. But no bean counter office is ever gonna let you have these for your production server
    To be fair... although I can see some point in your logic I strongly disagree. Someone with a new Ryzen 3 system with a decent X570 board would be mad not to buy one of these if they are in for a decent upgrade. I have a corsair g3 nvme drive and it's awesome makes an absolutely huge difference to how the system responds in normal useage
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  6. #6
    boop, got your nose stevie lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    southport
    Posts
    2,589
    Thanks
    403
    Thanked
    395 times in 302 posts
    • stevie lee's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II X6 1090T 6core 3.2ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair DDR3 1600 MHZ
      • Storage:
      • Hitachi 500, 640GB + 1TB. WDblue 2TB, Crucial M500 240GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia Palit 750 Ti
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Naxn 350 W
      • Case:
      • Xigmatech Midgard
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" Samsung SM2233BW
      • Internet:
      • 20mb plusnet unlimited!

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Do also be aware that Gen 4 drives are backward compatible; with the same drive attached to our regular Intel test platform via PCIe Gen 3 x4, we managed sequential read and write speeds of 3,481MB/s and 3,358MB/s, respectively. Handy to know if you're planning to use the drive on an existing rig before upgrading to PCIe Gen 4 at a later date.
    any chance of testing a Gen 3 drive in the Gen 4 slot too see if it goes any faster? see whether the Gen 3's are forward compatible?
    to see whether its worth paying so much for the Gen 4. they all seem to cap around these speeds so maybe there more to be had from them in the faster Gen 4 slot?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    2,759
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    107 times in 90 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Quote Originally Posted by stevie lee View Post
    any chance of testing a Gen 3 drive in the Gen 4 slot too see if it goes any faster? see whether the Gen 3's are forward compatible?
    to see whether its worth paying so much for the Gen 4. they all seem to cap around these speeds so maybe there more to be had from them in the faster Gen 4 slot?
    My Corsair Force isn't any quicker in a gen 4 slot.... if that helps
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  8. Received thanks from:

    stevie lee (05-12-2019)

  9. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    Someone with a new Ryzen 3 system with a decent X570 board would be mad not to buy one of these if they are in for a decent upgrade. I have a corsair g3 nvme drive and it's awesome makes an absolutely huge difference to how the system responds in normal useage
    Agreed - the target buyers will be the folks building a system based around the latest ThreadRipper / Ryzen CPUs on the latest motherboards/chipsets... that's the only place to get the necessary PCI 4.0 M.2 sockets right now.

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    254
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    I just don't trust seagate as a brand for consumers... I don't know -_-

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    211
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    10 times in 7 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    These are backwards compatible yes ?
    Otherwise i don't know what i should do if i was so lucky to win one here.

    I know my TR4 board cant max it out, still a nice C: i would like to have.

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    2,759
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    107 times in 90 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Quote Originally Posted by Gentle Viking View Post
    These are backwards compatible yes ?
    Otherwise i don't know what i should do if i was so lucky to win one here.

    I know my TR4 board cant max it out, still a nice C: i would like to have.
    Yes backwards compatible. Forward looking lol
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  13. #12
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Quote Originally Posted by QuorTek View Post
    I just don't trust seagate as a brand for consumers... I don't know -_-
    Glad it's not just me... every Seagate drive I've ever had has been trouble vs maybe 1 Western Digital drive out of 20+ over the years.

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • globalwarning's system
      • CPU:
      • AMD 1090T
      • Memory:
      • RIP JAW DDR3 1600 4x4GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 7950 OC (Boost)
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 750W
      • Case:
      • Old crap
      • Operating System:
      • Window 7 Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Hanns-G 281DPB

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Did I miss something or was this the only PCIE G4 x 4 drive they tested? Why would they compare it to only Gen3 drives???

  15. #14
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Quote Originally Posted by globalwarning View Post
    Did I miss something or was this the only PCIE G4 x 4 drive they tested? Why would they compare it to only Gen3 drives???
    There's not many PCIE Gen 4 options out there right now (and some of the current Gen 4 M.2 SSDs - e.g. Sabrent - use relatively slow FLASH memory despite the fast interface) - but still a useful article, if only to get a handle on the difference in performance between PCIE generations.

  16. #15
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Indio CA
    Posts
    28
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • acekorneya's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z77 Extreme4
      • CPU:
      • i7-3770k@4.7GHz NH-D15
      • Memory:
      • 16GB g.skill ripjaws x 1600
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung SSD SATA III, 500GB SATA III WD, 720GB seagate, 3TB External Fantom Drive USB 3.0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 1080 OC, Soundblaster Titanium HD
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX750
      • Case:
      • Be quite pro 900
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP Elite l2201x and 40 inch Samsung for 2 monitor
      • Internet:
      • 80Mbs Down 10Mbs up TimeWarner

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    still waiting for samsung Gen 4 m.2 SSD's...

  17. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,427
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    69 times in 61 posts

    Re: Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe Gen 4 SSD

    Honestly, I would have liked to have seen a little bit of info over how hot they get etc and/or whether their performance is affected by being too hot like some of the older cards are/were.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •