Lo film people
I'm going to ask only one thing.... we need to try to trust mr Jackson on this.. and assume it's NOT just money.
Why would The Hobbit... be in THREE PARTS?
it will mean I will be 2 1/2 years older than I am now before I see the last bit
So... is it because it's 3d and it needs to be on 3 Blueray discs to sell in 3D? Is it because he wished that LOTR was over 4 or 5 films.... but couldn't do it because the book format wouldn't permit it? Facing facts.. the extended 4 disk box sets of all 3 LOTR are WELL WORTH the extra viewing time.. and it is quite a LOT more viewing time... maybe too much for cinema showings, so maybe he has SO MUCH Hobbit matrial it won't all fit into 2?
And allowing a tiny amount of fiscal debate.. has he over-spent? Does he need 3 incomes to actually come out ahead?