Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: FLAC a good choice?

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    37
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    FLAC a good choice?

    i have rips of my CD collection in wav format but think it would be better to have them compressed so they take up less space. don't want to use MP3 or any other lossy compression. so is FLAC the way to go? i read some time ago that FLAC is better supported than other formats e.g. WV on portable music players. on windows i use foobar which plays FLAC.

  2. #2
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,621
    Thanks
    3,757
    Thanked
    5,060 times in 3,912 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: FLAC a good choice?

    I asked a similar question a while back:

    http://forums.hexus.net/audio-visual...ss-format.html

    I hope the thread is useful!!
    Last edited by CAT-THE-FIFTH; 05-12-2012 at 11:48 PM.

  3. #3
    Moderator chuckskull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    7,713
    Thanks
    951
    Thanked
    690 times in 463 posts
    • chuckskull's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77-D3H
      • CPU:
      • 3570k @ 4.7 - H100i
      • Memory:
      • 32GB XMS3 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 850 Pro + 3TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 980Ti Classified
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12 700W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 500R
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus VG278HE
      • Internet:
      • FTTC

    Re: FLAC a good choice?

    FLAC is lossless, thus provides the highest possible sound quality. It also exceeds WAV in being album to embed metadata(album art and so forth). However, you pay a large price in file size 500mb to 1gig per album and without high quality gear and sharp ears you'd really struggle to tell the difference between it and say something like 320kps/VBR MP3's. Also, it may not be compatible with your current MP3 player so check before you start ripping.

    It really comes down to personal taste. Compare with your own gear and think about how much you're willing to spend on hard drives and backups, although price is an ever lessening problem with 3TB drives now available for £100ish. I used to be quite the fan of FLAC but nowadays. I'm happy with 320kps MP3 and similar, the quality is absolutely fine and it's far less hassle, particularly as my music collection has grown.

    If you want more detailed info I highly recommend the hydrogen audio wiki: http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Main_Page

  4. #4
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,621
    Thanks
    3,757
    Thanked
    5,060 times in 3,912 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: FLAC a good choice?

    I ripped a lot of CDs and used Level 8 FLAC encodes,and the album size varied between 300MB to 600MB. FLAC is not lossy and you can convert it to other formats easily. I also tend to prefer AAC over MP3 if you are using lossy compression,at least from my own listening tests.

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    37
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: FLAC a good choice?

    i was using WV but moved over to FLAC. i know of one portable music player that supports FLAC but not WV.

  6. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • mekeirc's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3-B3
      • CPU:
      • i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 (250GB), Intel 520 (60GB), 2x Samsung 1TB Spinpoint F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 6850
      • PSU:
      • XFX Pro Core 550W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Define R4
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate, OSX Mountain Lion
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG IPS-235
      • Internet:
      • 80Mb

    Re: FLAC a good choice?

    I'd suggest archival of FLAC, so you can convert it to whatever format you wish. Decent music players even support OGG and other well compressed file types nowadays, which will generally have a better quality than MP3 and AAC, look into it.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London town
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    21 times in 16 posts

    Re: FLAC a good choice?

    Quote Originally Posted by northernpcgeek View Post
    i have rips of my CD collection in wav format but think it would be better to have them compressed so they take up less space. don't want to use MP3 or any other lossy compression. so is FLAC the way to go? i read some time ago that FLAC is better supported than other formats e.g. WV on portable music players. on windows i use foobar which plays FLAC.
    I'll not bother with the standard lossless vs lossy as you've ripped to wav so know what you're doing.

    As already mentioned, the meta data is a useful addition over wav. The main other one is checksumming - it's handy being able to get foobar to run a check against your collection once in a while, though flac isn't as good here as some of the other lossless formats though.

    I started ripping my collection in the late 90s - went lossless a few months after playing with wm and mp3. Used monkeys audio for a long time and switched to flac about 4 years ago. I've just decided to covert all my single file flac/cue rips to one track per file flac given that's what stuff is now delivered in from the (decent) download stores and my purpose for ripping to cd images (to re-burn a copy of a lost disc) will now never happen ...

  8. #8
    Grumpy and VERY old :( g8ina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    6,622
    Thanks
    2,465
    Thanked
    1,555 times in 1,046 posts
    • g8ina's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z75 Pro3
      • CPU:
      • Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz 3.40 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair 1600MHz DDR3.
      • Storage:
      • 250GB SSD system, 250GB SSD Data + 2TB data, + 8TB NAS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon HD 6870
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Elite 430
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Iiyama 22"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 100MB unlimited

    Re: FLAC a good choice?

    As I've stated elsewhere, my iRiver H120 MP3 player/recorder can play FLAC if the alternative OS is installed - Rockbox.

    This may also apply to many other players so check yours out.
    Cheers, David



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •