Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Raid setup

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Raid setup

    Hey up

    Finally going to purchase a system but was wondering if it worth going for a raid setup for a gaming system, if so, how easy is it to setup using vista 32 bit ultimate edition. Thinking of getting 2X 250gb spinpoints.

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Lover & Fighter Blitzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Between Your Mum & Sister
    Posts
    6,310
    Thanks
    539
    Thanked
    382 times in 300 posts
    • Blitzen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ABIT iX38 QuadGT
      • CPU:
      • Intel Quad Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz : 30 Degrees Idle - 41-46 Degrees Load
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 1GB OCZ Platinum PC6400 @ 4-4-4-12
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 500GB Samsung Spinpoints - RAID 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 285
      • PSU:
      • Enermax MODU 82+ 625W
      • Case:
      • Antec Nine Hundred
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate 64Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic Q22wb 22" Widescreen - 5ms
      • Internet:
      • O2 premium @ 17mb
    Very easy.
    Post back when you have the parts for some guidance.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    will do, just didnt want to order 2 drives and find out it would be a nightmare.

    cheers

  4. #4
    Lover & Fighter Blitzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Between Your Mum & Sister
    Posts
    6,310
    Thanks
    539
    Thanked
    382 times in 300 posts
    • Blitzen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ABIT iX38 QuadGT
      • CPU:
      • Intel Quad Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz : 30 Degrees Idle - 41-46 Degrees Load
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 1GB OCZ Platinum PC6400 @ 4-4-4-12
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 500GB Samsung Spinpoints - RAID 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 285
      • PSU:
      • Enermax MODU 82+ 625W
      • Case:
      • Antec Nine Hundred
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate 64Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic Q22wb 22" Widescreen - 5ms
      • Internet:
      • O2 premium @ 17mb
    Your load times in game will see a good improvement using RAID 0

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    rember you don't just need to simler HDD's you need a MOBO which surrports RAID 0 or a RAID card

  6. #6
    Senior Member specofdust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    794
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    If by good improvement you mean 2-3 seconds off some games, sure they will.

    RAID 0 ain't worth it for games folks. It more than doubles your chances of data loss and really doesn't do much(or anything) for the vast majority of games and windows startup time.

    It's good for moving huge sequential files. Wanna move 30GB of files in half the time? Great, get a RAID 0! Wanna have things nice and quick when you're editing multi gigabyte DVD's in video software? RAID 0! Want games and windows to load fast? Buy a WD Raptor.

    There simply isn't compelling reason to use a RAID 0 for games or windows.

  7. #7
    YUKIKAZE arthurleung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    3,280
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    88 times in 83 posts
    • arthurleung's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5E (Rampage Formula 0902)
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 3.6Ghz 1.2V
      • Memory:
      • A-Data DDR2-800 2x2GB CL4
      • Storage:
      • 4x1TB WD1000FYPS @ RAID5 3Ware 9500S-8 / 3x 1TB Samsung Ecogreen F2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GeCube HD4870 512MB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair VX450
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows Server 2008 Standard
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Ultrasharp 2709W + 2001FP
      • Internet:
      • Be*Unlimited 20Mbps
    Quote Originally Posted by specofdust View Post
    If by good improvement you mean 2-3 seconds off some games, sure they will.

    RAID 0 ain't worth it for games folks. It more than doubles your chances of data loss and really doesn't do much(or anything) for the vast majority of games and windows startup time.

    It's good for moving huge sequential files. Wanna move 30GB of files in half the time? Great, get a RAID 0! Wanna have things nice and quick when you're editing multi gigabyte DVD's in video software? RAID 0! Want games and windows to load fast? Buy a WD Raptor.

    There simply isn't compelling reason to use a RAID 0 for games or windows.
    I did some test myself, moving 30GB from Disk0 to Disk1 is faster than moving 30GB from Partition 1 to Partition2 (RAID0). "So Wanna move 30GB of files in half the time" is complete rubbish in basic 2xHDD environment.

    If you want fast game loading, use windows software raid and make small 5G partitions (10G RAID0) for paging and another 20G partitions (40G RAID0) for gaming, then use the other space for storage without RAID.

    RAID0 will only be faster for moving sequential files ONLY if you have another RAID0 on another pair of disks.
    Workstation 1: Intel i7 950 @ 3.8Ghz / X58 / 12GB DDR3-1600 / HD4870 512MB / Antec P180
    Workstation 2: Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.6Ghz / X38 / 4GB DDR2-800 / 8400GS 512MB / Open Air
    Workstation 3: Intel Xeon X3350 @ 3.2Ghz / P35 / 4GB DDR2-800 / HD4770 512MB / Shuttle SP35P2
    HTPC: AMD Athlon X4 620 @ 2.6Ghz / 780G / 4GB DDR2-1000 / Antec Mini P180 White
    Mobile Workstation: Intel C2D T8300 @ 2.4Ghz / GM965 / 3GB DDR2-667 / DELL Inspiron 1525 / 6+6+9 Cell Battery

    Display (Monitor): DELL Ultrasharp 2709W + DELL Ultrasharp 2001FP
    Display (Projector): Epson TW-3500 1080p
    Speakers: Creative Megaworks THX550 5.1
    Headphones: Etymotic hf2 / Ultimate Ears Triple.fi 10 Pro

    Storage: 8x2TB Hitachi @ DELL PERC 6/i RAID6 / 13TB Non-RAID Across 12 HDDs
    Consoles: PS3 Slim 120GB / Xbox 360 Arcade 20GB / PS2

  8. #8
    Senior Member specofdust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    794
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    No offence intended, but you needed to move files from an array that can go at maybe 150MB/s to a disk that can write at only 60MB/s before knowing that it wouldn't speed things up? It is kinda obvious. Apoligies if my post seemed misleading, but I just felt it was implicit that you'd need to be have a drive capable of writing the same speed as the drives you're reading from. I guess perhaps I assumed more than I should have.

    RAID 0 speeds up sequential transfers. That's the point I was trying to make. It doesn't do anything else. It doesn't lower access times, and those are whats important for games and windows loading times.
    Last edited by specofdust; 02-04-2007 at 11:17 PM.

  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by specofdust View Post
    RAID 0 ain't worth it for games folks. It more than doubles your chances of data loss and really doesn't do much.
    It won't do too much in games but clicking icons e.g word will open a lot quicker, Moving files will be faster, load times will be quicker ect

    Although I do not agree with doubling the chance of DATA lost as in most cases when a modern HDD fails it is because of a PSU blowing. So the chances are that if your sytem blows without RAID the HDD goes and with RAID 2 HDDs go. Still incresses DATA loss but not by a factor of 2 IMO

  10. #10
    Senior Member specofdust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    794
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Actually I said by more than a factor of two. Two drives is twice the risk of drives dying as one drive, and the fact that theres RAID operations being carried out adds another weak link to the chain. Since if the controller goes belly up you're almost certainly in hot water.

    I see no reason why it would make something like word open faster. Yes, moving files will* go faster - but load times will generally not be apreciably faster. Not unless you're sitting there with a stopwatch. Game loading times and opening(the vast majority of) things in windows is speeded up by having a drive that can very quickly find files. A game loading doesn't load 4 600MB files. It loads hundreds or thousands of files, many of which will only be a few kilobytes. Read speed is irrelevent when it comes to files like that, what you need is a low seek time.

    *arthurleung might object to my use of "will" so feel free to substitute "can" in its place

  11. #11
    YUKIKAZE arthurleung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    3,280
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    88 times in 83 posts
    • arthurleung's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5E (Rampage Formula 0902)
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 3.6Ghz 1.2V
      • Memory:
      • A-Data DDR2-800 2x2GB CL4
      • Storage:
      • 4x1TB WD1000FYPS @ RAID5 3Ware 9500S-8 / 3x 1TB Samsung Ecogreen F2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GeCube HD4870 512MB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair VX450
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows Server 2008 Standard
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Ultrasharp 2709W + 2001FP
      • Internet:
      • Be*Unlimited 20Mbps
    but I just felt it was implicit that you'd need to be have a drive capable of writing the same speed as the drives you're reading from.
    The OP is planning for 2x250G so it is unlikely that he will have another 2x HDD in RAID0 for the "doubled speed transfer".

    Although I do not agree with doubling the chance of DATA lost as in most cases when a modern HDD fails it is because of a PSU blowing.
    In the past 3 years I've only had premature harddrive deaths (i.e. DOA or dying within a month since open). I've had a PSU blown but that had no effect on any of my component at all (seems to be the case with mid to high-end psu anyway)

    Consider most people run RAID0 on NEW disks, it is very likely one of the drive fails within the first 3 month of usage
    Workstation 1: Intel i7 950 @ 3.8Ghz / X58 / 12GB DDR3-1600 / HD4870 512MB / Antec P180
    Workstation 2: Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.6Ghz / X38 / 4GB DDR2-800 / 8400GS 512MB / Open Air
    Workstation 3: Intel Xeon X3350 @ 3.2Ghz / P35 / 4GB DDR2-800 / HD4770 512MB / Shuttle SP35P2
    HTPC: AMD Athlon X4 620 @ 2.6Ghz / 780G / 4GB DDR2-1000 / Antec Mini P180 White
    Mobile Workstation: Intel C2D T8300 @ 2.4Ghz / GM965 / 3GB DDR2-667 / DELL Inspiron 1525 / 6+6+9 Cell Battery

    Display (Monitor): DELL Ultrasharp 2709W + DELL Ultrasharp 2001FP
    Display (Projector): Epson TW-3500 1080p
    Speakers: Creative Megaworks THX550 5.1
    Headphones: Etymotic hf2 / Ultimate Ears Triple.fi 10 Pro

    Storage: 8x2TB Hitachi @ DELL PERC 6/i RAID6 / 13TB Non-RAID Across 12 HDDs
    Consoles: PS3 Slim 120GB / Xbox 360 Arcade 20GB / PS2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. RAID setup question
    By atomicjeep in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23-03-2006, 11:28 AM
  2. creating a RAID setup
    By Destroyer^ in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-01-2006, 03:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •