4300 vs 4400

[Smudger]

Not being familiar with the Core2Duo range, I was wondering if the £15 price difference between the 2 chips was worth paying for the extra performance, considering that I'm not averse to overclocking, provided it's easy and failsafe.

On another note, is the 6320 worth the extra £15 again on top of the 4400, if the PC is to be used for general internet/e-mail/occasional gaming.

I will probably be adding a P5B basic and 2gb of TwinX Corsair memory at 4-4-4-12, whatever that means.

[kungpo]

I've just been through that. Went with the E4300. You save enough over the 6320 to risk serious overclocking. General consensus is the 4300 is good enough, and I wouldn't have thought the extra 200mhz makes that much difference.