i've been working on this for the last few weeks on and off
Download:http://www.alsenior.me.uk/files/raid...idguide1.2.zip
i'd love some feedback if i have missed anything or there is anything that need changing or modifying.
Go crazy:rockon2:
Printable View
i've been working on this for the last few weeks on and off
Download:http://www.alsenior.me.uk/files/raid...idguide1.2.zip
i'd love some feedback if i have missed anything or there is anything that need changing or modifying.
Go crazy:rockon2:
Alsenior - downloaded- Thanks . Don't use raid ATM but this will maybe motivate me . :)
Cheers mate, I'll give this a go, see what I can grasp from it :)
Not bad Alsenior. I personally would always like to refer to the benefits of one type of raid over another type with full practical examples.
For example my data base works better with raid 5 for data and raid 1 for logs because.... etc
But definitely a great starting point.
TiG
Thanks i didn't really understand Raid before but thats helped a lot, i think il give it a go when i can afford to upgrade my HDDs
Your definition of Intel matrix raid is somewhat different from my understanding.
Seems strangely different to Intels own explanation IntelĀ® Matrix Storage TechnologyQuote:
Intel matrix raid is a combined raid 1 and raid 0 on 2 disks. It works
by splitting the disk into 2 parts and having one pair of parts as a
raid0 and the other pair raid1.
Most users use raid0 & raid5 for the 2nd volume.
Valid point there i'll stick on the things to update list. the reason why i put this is that to me matrix raid loses it's point on more that 2 drives because you may aswell have the whole load as raid 5 as the storage gain is minimal by using matrix raid and spitting the drives. having a different point of view helps here. thanks for pointing that out
Yep but matrix raid & the ability to run a fast raid0 + a secure raid on the 2nd volume is a big plus for many. It provides a flexiblr & cheap solution, without the cost of addon cards.
The interest shown in bing's thread
Enter The Matrix: Slice out and get the best part from your hard drives serves to show the interest.
Thank you alsenior. Will give it a read, usually dont use much RAID, but always interested in such things.
Thanks, have read that and realised that the way I have things set up at the moment is wrong!
Update posted with the ideas from supershanks and TiG
Hi alsenior, ive just read through the raid guide, good stuff, but i've corrected some spelling/punctuation stuff because im anal like that, and added headers etc, just tidied it up basically, have a read through - oh and ive suggested that you explain about parity/crc data in the RAID5 array, ie say how its generated, and thus how data can be 'salvaged' if a drive in the array dies :)
anyhow, its available here
hey, in your guide there is a lot of mention of losing data if drives fail, does running in raid make it more likely that one of your drives will fail or are you simply pointing out that that is what would happen if one was to fail?
new release with (most if not all) streetsters corrections and place holder coming in a few minutes
Edit: uploaded
I want to read this but the site is down for me atm :< will check tomorrow.
On a slight related note... I don't suppose anyone would happen to know if HP server hard drives would work in a normal desktop SCSI controller?
Cheers
hp server drives would work you would just need the appropriate converters
just posting a update.
Things that have changed
- Diagrams
- Added info about raid 6
- Added info about JBOD
- Now available on scribd for viewing without download
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4605303/Th...-for-beginners
That looks like a pretty nice guide there.
Id love to give setting up RAID a go but at the moment I just don't have the time or patience
Its good - couple of typos to be removed. You haven't mentioned RAID 6. I think ythe biggest drawback of RAID 1 isn't that the chance of dual drive failure is still quite high (it is no higher than that of single drive failure, and having two drives - from different batches - is lower than single drive failure) is that of "false sense of security" and of course all hardware RAIOD controllers still have a single point of failure - the controller. This is negated if one or more elements of the array is iSCSI - although that is not something that would really apply in a home environment.
I'm not sure about the therotical speeds in RAID 0 - I have a feeling that write performance can be worse.
There are other softwarte RAID implementations - such as mdadm.
Finally it might be worth emphasising that RAID is really about resiliance and uptime, and is not a substitute for a backup regime! (Puts hobby horse away :) )
But great concise guide! (and I am aware that it is much easier to criticise - I hope constructively - someone elses work than to write your own!)
awsome! thanks for posting this. Been thinking about playing around wiht RAID and this is gonna help :)