Apart from avoiding the dust getting into the case, does it have another utility? sorry if it sounds like a dumb question
Apart from avoiding the dust getting into the case, does it have another utility? sorry if it sounds like a dumb question
Provides additional rigity for the case, stops someone putting a screw driver into the back of your computer and into the motherboard etc.
Its just a good idea to use it. Plus using it to keep the unit sealed can actually improve air flow rather than reduce it.
Hope that answers your question
TiG
-- Hexus Meets Rock! --
Esd?
Main Rig: LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D | AMD Opteron 165@2.65Ghz | 2GB TwinMoss DDR PC3200 | GeForce 8800GT 512MB | 2*500GB Seagate 7200.10 | Antec P182 case
Shuttle Rig: Shuttle SN41G2B | Sempron 2200+ | 1GB NANYA DDR PC3200 | ATi Radeon 9600 128MB | 2*320GB Seagate 7200.8
HTPC: Abit Abit AN-M2HD | Athlon X2 BE-2400 | 2GB Corsair DDR2 PC2-5300 | 500GB Seagate 7200.11 | Terratec Cinergy 2400i DT | Antec Fusion Black HTPC Case
Furton.NET Coming soon!
Thanks for the anwsers. I was worried because I just received a B-grade Gigabyte 7n400 pro2 that came without it. And suddenly I realized that I didn't know for sure what is it for really. Now I need to look for alternatives, some sealing tape I guess
don't you mean EMF
electromotive force? whaat?Originally Posted by bennydad
electromagnetic fieldOriginally Posted by Byatt
the reason for FCC validation
electrical devices have to accept and not discharge EMF
duh!
sorry, part time physicist, I automatically see EMF as electromotive force.Originally Posted by bennydad
further explanation needed, currently we have "electrical devices have to accept and not discharge EMF" ... well every single circuit in the PC will create an electromagnetic field, so are you saying the I/O plate should not interfere with this?
Do you mean that the I/O should act as a "shield" for the electromagnetic fields created by the PC? That makes sense...
Last edited by Byatt; 14-01-2004 at 12:03 AM.
Originally Posted by Big_Al
You're unbelievable!
Sorry.
[XP2500-M @ 200x11] [2X512MB Crucial PC2700] [MSI K7N2 Delta ISLR] [160GB 8MB Samsung SP1614N] [160GB 8MB Maxtor DiamondMax9] [Megaworks 250Ds] [GeforceFX 5900] [Viewsonic VP171s]
Originally Posted by Byatt
LOL Electromotive Force...you been studying batteries and their internal resistances of late ?
I don't agree with the argument about E-M Fields myself - can't see any relevance, too much interferance in general with a system to be choosy about shielding one just one minute area.
Another reason for the backplate is a shorter path to ground.
Last edited by Pita^Norf; 14-01-2004 at 01:32 AM.
|Abit NF7-S V 2.0|1.8v Vdd |XP 1700+ 1.95v @ 2518 Mhz 219 x 11.5|
| 2 x 256 TwinMos w/Winbond BH-5 DC 11, 2, 2, CL2 @ 3.0v Vdimm |
|Herc ATI Rad 9800SE AIW | Innovatek H2o on CPU & NB, SB Cooling|
| Adaptec 39160 | Seagate Cheetah ST318406LW | ST336706LW |
.. another reason ... to make sure you have lined up your motherboard correctly - admittedly not being able to screw mobo screws in should give you a clue but ...Originally Posted by Pita^Norf
Ah, but would you not agree that a mobo can still be line up correctly even if the backplate was absent ?Originally Posted by BlackSheep
|Abit NF7-S V 2.0|1.8v Vdd |XP 1700+ 1.95v @ 2518 Mhz 219 x 11.5|
| 2 x 256 TwinMos w/Winbond BH-5 DC 11, 2, 2, CL2 @ 3.0v Vdimm |
|Herc ATI Rad 9800SE AIW | Innovatek H2o on CPU & NB, SB Cooling|
| Adaptec 39160 | Seagate Cheetah ST318406LW | ST336706LW |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)