Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Which is better on the temps?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    123
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Which is better on the temps?

    Lower multiplier/higher FSB, or standard multiplier/increased FSB?

    I don't think I've tinkered with lower multiplier settings yet, but my E4400 gets too warm for my liking at 3ghz with the standard multiplier.

  2. #2
    finding nemo staffsMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,498
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    794 times in 741 posts
    • staffsMike's system
      • Motherboard:
      • evga 680i
      • CPU:
      • e6600
      • Memory:
      • geil ultra pc6400
      • Storage:
      • WD 320gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • leadtek 8800 GTS 640mb
      • PSU:
      • ocz gameXstream 700w
      • Case:
      • akasa eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • dell 2007wfp and Lg L194WT
      • Internet:
      • pipex homecall

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    The higher the FSB the harder you push the motherboard..so it's own temps will increase

    What cooler do you use?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    123
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    Quote Originally Posted by staffsMike View Post
    The higher the FSB the harder you push the motherboard..so it's own temps will increase

    What cooler do you use?
    Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro. I'm happy with 2.66ghz, but I was just wondering if I could tinker with it to get a bit more juice out of it.

  4. #4
    finding nemo staffsMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,498
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    794 times in 741 posts
    • staffsMike's system
      • Motherboard:
      • evga 680i
      • CPU:
      • e6600
      • Memory:
      • geil ultra pc6400
      • Storage:
      • WD 320gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • leadtek 8800 GTS 640mb
      • PSU:
      • ocz gameXstream 700w
      • Case:
      • akasa eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • dell 2007wfp and Lg L194WT
      • Internet:
      • pipex homecall

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    What kind of temps do you get?

    No chip is a sure thing for a good overclock but i'd imagine you would get a little more out of it than that.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,013
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    20 times in 18 posts
    • excalibur2's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Z77-d3h
      • CPU:
      • Intel 2500k @4.4ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2X4gb Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • WD 2tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • R290
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 750
      • Case:
      • Haf-x tower
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell u2410
      • Internet:
      • broadband with Plusnet

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    Quote Originally Posted by gt81 View Post
    Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro. I'm happy with 2.66ghz, but I was just wondering if I could tinker with it to get a bit more juice out of it.
    If you have a good case, IMHO AC7Pro is ok for 3ghz with a E4300 (maybe not in a heatwave) but is struggling with E2140 at 3ghz............the case fans are on lowest setting I might get round to speeding them up or put another one in.
    2nd computer gigabyte P965ds3p, 7770 E2140@2.9ghz, corsair HX520 6 years stable, replaced now with E8400@3.9ghz and will overclock more when I'm bored.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    123
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    Quote Originally Posted by staffsMike View Post
    What kind of temps do you get?

    No chip is a sure thing for a good overclock but i'd imagine you would get a little more out of it than that.
    I've set the BIOS to sound off when the chip gets to 60 degrees. At 3ghz, with the TAT stress test it only takes a few minutes before it starts beeping. Cores currently about 66 under full load. Smartfan is off, so they're pretty much running full speed.

    Case is Akasa Zen, for whoever wanted to know. Probably not the greatest for dissipating heat.

  7. #7
    finding nemo staffsMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,498
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    794 times in 741 posts
    • staffsMike's system
      • Motherboard:
      • evga 680i
      • CPU:
      • e6600
      • Memory:
      • geil ultra pc6400
      • Storage:
      • WD 320gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • leadtek 8800 GTS 640mb
      • PSU:
      • ocz gameXstream 700w
      • Case:
      • akasa eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • dell 2007wfp and Lg L194WT
      • Internet:
      • pipex homecall

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    I would reseat the cooler to make sure it's snug.

    it could just be the chip isn't great though.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    123
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    Quote Originally Posted by staffsMike View Post
    I would reseat the cooler to make sure it's snug.

    it could just be the chip isn't great though.
    I've done that already, and reapplied thermal paste. Ah well, as I said, I'm fairly happy with what it is now, fast enough for most of the things I do.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,013
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    20 times in 18 posts
    • excalibur2's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Z77-d3h
      • CPU:
      • Intel 2500k @4.4ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2X4gb Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • WD 2tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • R290
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 750
      • Case:
      • Haf-x tower
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell u2410
      • Internet:
      • broadband with Plusnet

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    Quote Originally Posted by gt81 View Post
    I've done that already, and reapplied thermal paste. Ah well, as I said, I'm fairly happy with what it is now, fast enough for most of the things I do.

    Well if you want to swop your E4400 for my E2140 that can go to 3.17ghz (maybe higher by increasing the voltages), I would put the E4400 into my 2nd computer as it has a higher multiplier.......................................................................................... .............................
    2nd computer gigabyte P965ds3p, 7770 E2140@2.9ghz, corsair HX520 6 years stable, replaced now with E8400@3.9ghz and will overclock more when I'm bored.

  10. Received thanks from:

    gt81 (30-10-2007)

  11. #10
    Senior Amoeba iranu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    On the dinner table. Blechh!
    Posts
    3,535
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked
    156 times in 106 posts
    • iranu's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus Gene VI
      • CPU:
      • 4670K @4.3Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb Samsung Green
      • Storage:
      • 1x 256Gb Samsung 830 SSD 2x640gb HGST raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX620W Modular
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master Silencio 352
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 ultimate 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 23" DELL Ultrasharp U2312HM
      • Internet:
      • 16mb broadband

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    TAT will stress the chip more so than any other program. Most C2D chips will hit 70°C max during a TAT run. I wouldn't worry about it hitting 66°C. Iirc C2D go upto about 85°C before shutdown. Many people are running TAT then getting worried about their temps. TAT will stress cpu to 100% rather than cycle at lower loads like most other stress testing programs.

    Temps will only increase as you increase the voltage. So what voltage are you running at @3ghz? Can you lower the voltage and still maintain the overclock?

    Do you get issues when using the PC?

    What are your temps at idle? What are your temps when running everyday applications and other cpu intensive applications? If they don't cause the chip to go above 60°C then you don't have any issues.

    I'd look at some cooling for your case if you are concerned.
    "Reality is what it is, not what you want it to be." Frank Zappa. ----------- "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." Huang Po.----------- "A drowsy line of wasted time bathes my open mind", - Ride.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    123
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Which is better on the temps?

    Quote Originally Posted by excalibur2 View Post
    Well if you want to swop your E4400 for my E2140 that can go to 3.17ghz (maybe higher by increasing the voltages), I would put the E4400 into my 2nd computer as it has a higher multiplier.......................................................................................... .............................
    Thanks for the offer, however I think I'll stick with this setup. As I said, I'm not particularly disappointed at not getting higher speeds, I originally only intended to overclock to about this speed anyway, it's just a shame I can't squeeze that little bit more out of the CPU. I might add some case fans and have another tinker at a later date, I'm still only messing about with basic overclocking.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What Do You Use To Measure Your Core2Duo Temps?
    By UseItNow in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-09-2007, 12:42 AM
  2. £25: a way to monitor your PC hardware temps :-)
    By Zak33 in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-06-2007, 08:41 PM
  3. E6600 cpu Temps
    By HarpZ76 in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-03-2007, 10:12 AM
  4. Artic Silver 5: temps rising over time
    By silon in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 18-01-2005, 08:11 AM
  5. Fluctuating CPU temps / thermal throttling
    By shredisn@tdead in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 16-12-2003, 05:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •