Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Raptor vs ordinary drive.

  1. #1
    Senior Citizen.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    isle of wight
    Posts
    678
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    21 times in 14 posts
    • daza's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI P35 (the green one)
      • CPU:
      • X3210 @ 3.6ghz 1.38v
      • Memory:
      • OCZ Sli PC8500 @ 1050 mhz
      • Storage:
      • 6x 160gb hitachi Deskstars.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8800GTS (640mb) @ 630/2000
      • PSU:
      • 750w Corsair PSU
      • Case:
      • Lian LI V2000
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x 19" daewoo @ 1440x900
      • Internet:
      • 8meg BT.

    Raptor vs ordinary drive.

    Right short story got a chance to get meself a raptor HDD, now only problem is its the 36gb model and the only drive it could replace is the OS as my games are way over 40gb at the mo.

    So would I see any difference in speed or any differece what so ever as the OS is currently sat on a 160gb Hitachi HDD.

  2. #2
    finding nemo staffsMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,498
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    794 times in 741 posts
    • staffsMike's system
      • Motherboard:
      • evga 680i
      • CPU:
      • e6600
      • Memory:
      • geil ultra pc6400
      • Storage:
      • WD 320gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • leadtek 8800 GTS 640mb
      • PSU:
      • ocz gameXstream 700w
      • Case:
      • akasa eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • dell 2007wfp and Lg L194WT
      • Internet:
      • pipex homecall

    Re: Raptor vs ordinary drive.

    There would probably be a noticeable difference between those two drives but something like a 500gb would be better.

  3. #3
    Get in the van. Fraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks
    284
    Thanked
    397 times in 231 posts
    • Fraz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A-UD5
      • CPU:
      • Watercooled i7-980X @ 4.2 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 24GB Crucial DDR3-1333
      • Storage:
      • 240 GB Vertex2E + 2 TB of Disk
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Water-cooled Sapphire 7970 @ 1175/1625
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Modu87+
      • Case:
      • Corsair 700D
      • Operating System:
      • Linux Mint 12 / Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 30" 3008WFP and two Dell 24" 2412M
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 60 Mbps

    Re: Raptor vs ordinary drive.

    Not worth the bother. Even the 150 GB raptor is only just a little bit faster than 1 TB 7200 RPM disks. I'd have thought the 36 GB one is probably not a match for a 500 GB 7200 RPM drive.

  4. #4
    Senior Citizen.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    isle of wight
    Posts
    678
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    21 times in 14 posts
    • daza's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI P35 (the green one)
      • CPU:
      • X3210 @ 3.6ghz 1.38v
      • Memory:
      • OCZ Sli PC8500 @ 1050 mhz
      • Storage:
      • 6x 160gb hitachi Deskstars.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8800GTS (640mb) @ 630/2000
      • PSU:
      • 750w Corsair PSU
      • Case:
      • Lian LI V2000
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x 19" daewoo @ 1440x900
      • Internet:
      • 8meg BT.

    Re: Raptor vs ordinary drive.

    Didnt think you could get a 500gb drive for £40

  5. #5
    finding nemo staffsMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,498
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    794 times in 741 posts
    • staffsMike's system
      • Motherboard:
      • evga 680i
      • CPU:
      • e6600
      • Memory:
      • geil ultra pc6400
      • Storage:
      • WD 320gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • leadtek 8800 GTS 640mb
      • PSU:
      • ocz gameXstream 700w
      • Case:
      • akasa eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • dell 2007wfp and Lg L194WT
      • Internet:
      • pipex homecall

    Re: Raptor vs ordinary drive.

    More like £60 for a good'un. Worth it though.

    Raptors are noisey and 36gb is pretty meaningless when games like crysis and cod4 are 8 - 12gb etc..

  6. #6
    Get in the van. Fraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    2,919
    Thanks
    284
    Thanked
    397 times in 231 posts
    • Fraz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A-UD5
      • CPU:
      • Watercooled i7-980X @ 4.2 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 24GB Crucial DDR3-1333
      • Storage:
      • 240 GB Vertex2E + 2 TB of Disk
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Water-cooled Sapphire 7970 @ 1175/1625
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Modu87+
      • Case:
      • Corsair 700D
      • Operating System:
      • Linux Mint 12 / Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 30" 3008WFP and two Dell 24" 2412M
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 60 Mbps

    Re: Raptor vs ordinary drive.

    Quote Originally Posted by daza View Post
    Didnt think you could get a 500gb drive for £40
    I don't think you can - you didn't mention anything about money.

    Paying £40 for a small, not particularly fast, noisy drive is a waste of £40. Better to spend £60 and get a 500 Gig Samsung spinpoint or Western Digital Caviar SE16, IMO. Probably faster, very quiet, and oodles of space.

  7. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    58
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • Ap0llo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5K Premium
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
      • Memory:
      • 2GB Geil Black Widow
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Western Digital SE16
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 285
      • PSU:
      • Antec 550W Modular
      • Case:
      • Lian Li V1000 Plus
      • Operating System:
      • Vista and XP
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dual 17" Dell
      • Internet:
      • 8mb BT Total Broadband

    Re: Raptor vs ordinary drive.

    You could always try out two 250gb WD SE16's and wack them in RAID-0. Alot better than a raptor IMO and your getting more HD space for your money. Only problem is that your screwed if one buggers up...

  8. #8
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked
    255 times in 217 posts

    Re: Raptor vs ordinary drive.

    RAID0 will have very little benefit for the average user though. It's really only sustained transfers where it really has an advantage, so using it for an OS with just the usual programs and games installed on it will show very little benefit. Having 2 drives with an access time of 12ms won't improve at all if they're working together. If anything, it'll increase on the average RAID controller, and can't possibly decrease even on the best ones, and access times are what's most important on a OS drive.

    Better to get a single larger drive.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,116
    Thanks
    906
    Thanked
    583 times in 408 posts

    Re: Raptor vs ordinary drive.

    I've got my OS installed on a Raptor, then all my docs/games on a different drive, then my swapfile on another, noticably faster than having everything on one drive.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. nForce2 and Western Digital EIDE drive
    By Zak33 in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 14-08-2007, 09:20 AM
  2. Problem installing my new SCSI hard drive
    By scottxxx in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-08-2006, 02:24 PM
  3. no drive C: !!
    By streetster in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21-09-2005, 03:24 PM
  4. multi boot options
    By robbiehall in forum Software
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27-10-2003, 08:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •