Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 38

Thread: Component reliability

  1. #1
    HEXUS.social member Agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    19,185
    Thanks
    739
    Thanked
    1,614 times in 1,050 posts

    Component reliability

    Is it me, or has component quality gone rapidly downhill over the last few years?

    I remember "Back in the day" () when it was shockingly rare to get a faulty component. It was that rare that cross shipping with some of the big retailers of the time was common place if you asked for it.

    I suppose its a case of components constantly getting more complex and QA not being able to keep up with it? or perhaps its worth letting the few that slip through based on the economics of faulty# vs cost of RMA ratio?

    PSU's and graphics cards are the prime ones for this. Although the number of cheapo PSUs on the market really makes the situation worse.

    I pretty much accept that for every 3/4 machines I build, something will have to go back (and I don't buy cheap parts, is just false economy).

    Anyone else think its getting a bit silly? I'd happily pay a few quid extra for higher quality components / manufacturing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    And by trying to force me to like small pants, they've alienated me.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked
    368 times in 278 posts
    • matty-hodgson's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit IP35 Dark Raider
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 4GHz (59'C Under a TRUE Black)
      • Memory:
      • 4GB OCZ DDR2 890MHz (5-4-4-15)
      • Storage:
      • Intel 80GB - Games. Intel 80GB - OS. 1TB Samsung - Storage.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA Zotac GTX 275: 728 Core, 1614 Shader, 1340 Memory
      • PSU:
      • Enermax MODU82+ 625w
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SM2343BW (2048x1152)
      • Internet:
      • Smallworld 4Mbps

    Re: Component reliability

    well when i built my PC in december, the motherboard didn't work, the graphics card didn't work and the PSU had a faulty PCI-E rail.

    was nearly january before i got the motherboard back becuase City-Link bolloxed up with the return of the motherboard.

    rather annoying, but i'm with you, i'd definately rather pay an extra few quid to know it's gonna work when i plug it all in!
    instead of having to stick old parts in and test them 1 by 1..

    edit: and there's also all the delivery and everything, if you RMA something you're tripling the CO2 emmisions on the delivery.. may not sound like much, but add everything up that's been RMA'd that could've been helped..

  3. #3
    D.M
    D.M is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    • D.M's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X w/Noctua NH-D15 Chromax Black
      • Memory:
      • 32GB (4x8) Team Group 8Pack 3,600MHz CL16 (Samsung B-Die)
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent Rocket 512GB NVMe + Sabrent Rocket 1TB NVMe + 1TB Seagate Barracuda 7,200RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Radeon RX 5700XT Nitro+ Special Edition
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova P2 1200W Platinum
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Eclipse P600S - White
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer XZ321QU 32" 144Hz 1440p FreeSync Curved
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Component reliability

    I totally agree with you both, with my current new build I've had 4 faulty mobos, 2 faulty PSUs and 1 faulty GFX card! This kinda thing rarely happend in the past, I just think companies put themselves under such pressure to be the 1st to market and forgoe (sp?) alot of QA and testing and hope for the best on returns (lack of funding to QA vs RMA costs).

    I'd happily pay a few pennies more knowing that its all top quality stuff and will work 1st time and last a long while too.

    Thats another thing I guess things arent designed to last too long either as they want you to upgrade often and buy more of their 'wares!

    Just my 2 cents!

  4. #4
    Senior Member GSte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    1,539
    Thanks
    220
    Thanked
    76 times in 64 posts
    • GSte's system
      • Motherboard:
      • P6T Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • i7 920 @ 4.2GHz / TRUE
      • Memory:
      • 6GB GSkill 1600MHz cas6
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Barracuda, 2 x WD 500GB AAKS, 1TB Caviar Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX470
      • PSU:
      • NorthQ Black Magic Flex 850W
      • Case:
      • X-Clio Windtunnel
      • Operating System:
      • XP Home, Vista Home Premium X64, Win7 Home X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 245B
      • Internet:
      • Be Not So Happy

    Re: Component reliability

    I get very suspicious about this Agent, certain suppliers have a very high incidence of sending me dodgy components, while others always send me working ones. I have to wonder if it's the etailers sending out stock that has been RMA'd to them, to save money on having to return it to their suppliers themselves, in the hope that either: a) we might keep it, or b) we might not notice in time before the 30 day RTB period and have to RMA it to the manufacturer ourselves...... it's just uncanny, I can predict with a fair amount of certainty the chance of getting working components it seems depending on the company.

  5. #5
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Component reliability

    it maybe has to do with the exponential increase on numbers of transistors... there more there is the more likely it is that one of them will go wrong and create a faulty device... just a thought

  6. #6
    Senior Amoeba iranu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    On the dinner table. Blechh!
    Posts
    3,535
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked
    156 times in 106 posts
    • iranu's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus Gene VI
      • CPU:
      • 4670K @4.3Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb Samsung Green
      • Storage:
      • 1x 256Gb Samsung 830 SSD 2x640gb HGST raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX620W Modular
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master Silencio 352
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 ultimate 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 23" DELL Ultrasharp U2312HM
      • Internet:
      • 16mb broadband

    Re: Component reliability

    It's called relocating your factories to China. QA just isn't as good.

    The dept I work in spends most of it's time giving concessions to manufacturers who make random changes to the materials they make components from. They get away with murder but because they are in India it costs 2p to make something and accountants only see the bottom line they don't see the additional costs involved in getting compliance. Scares me really because I don't think we get the same quality of aircraft engine parts.

    I remember doing some research for my 28" flat screen CRT telly and you could guarantee that Sony, Panasonic and Phillips would be very reliable. 2 years later and the prices in general had halved and the quality across the board had gone through the floor. What happens is a company pioneers a process, the quality is high, then they flog the process to someone else who cut corners and the quality drops.
    "Reality is what it is, not what you want it to be." Frank Zappa. ----------- "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." Huang Po.----------- "A drowsy line of wasted time bathes my open mind", - Ride.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    122
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • DWhitley's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z68-V PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2600k (4.5GHz) with Corsair Hydro H60
      • Memory:
      • G-Skill RipjawsX 16GB 1600Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Crucial SSD M4 128GB, x2 3TB WD Red, x2 6TB WD Red Pro
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI HD 6870 HAWK
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Liberty 400w (temporary - prior to upgrading case)
      • Case:
      • Antec P180 with x2 Scythe Gentle Typhoons
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Mitsubishi Diamond Plus 220
      • Internet:
      • BT

    Re: Component reliability

    Quote Originally Posted by D.M View Post
    ...with my current new build I've had 4 faulty mobos, 2 faulty PSUs and 1 faulty GFX card!
    Bloody ell !!

    Can you name them, or at least give us a clue?

  8. #8
    D.M
    D.M is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    • D.M's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X w/Noctua NH-D15 Chromax Black
      • Memory:
      • 32GB (4x8) Team Group 8Pack 3,600MHz CL16 (Samsung B-Die)
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent Rocket 512GB NVMe + Sabrent Rocket 1TB NVMe + 1TB Seagate Barracuda 7,200RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Radeon RX 5700XT Nitro+ Special Edition
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova P2 1200W Platinum
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Eclipse P600S - White
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer XZ321QU 32" 144Hz 1440p FreeSync Curved
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Component reliability

    Quote Originally Posted by DWhitley View Post
    Bloody ell !!

    Can you name them, or at least give us a clue?
    lol, I can laugh now!

    2x fautly abit IX38 Quad GT's
    3x faulty Gigabyte X38-DQ6's (Ive just remember its 5 faulty mobos!)

    2x faulty Tagan BZ900w PSUs (the new one with LED lights on the locking connectors, 3rd one is being shipped to me for Wednesday delivery, so it may be 3? just have to wait and see )

    1x faulty BFG 8800GTS!

    Phew!

    Oh and I forgot my 1st delivery of my Cosmos case was also damaged so I guess that counts as another fault! (ebuyer were fantastic on the RMA though so no biggy)

  9. #9
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Component reliability

    Its a good thing we have e-tailers such as scan and ebuyer to make up for the suppliers lacking standards

  10. #10
    finding nemo staffsMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,498
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    794 times in 741 posts
    • staffsMike's system
      • Motherboard:
      • evga 680i
      • CPU:
      • e6600
      • Memory:
      • geil ultra pc6400
      • Storage:
      • WD 320gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • leadtek 8800 GTS 640mb
      • PSU:
      • ocz gameXstream 700w
      • Case:
      • akasa eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • dell 2007wfp and Lg L194WT
      • Internet:
      • pipex homecall

    Re: Component reliability

    I havn't had a single problem with 5 new different builds and 3 new laptops in the last year..

    Mostly from scan, a bit from OCUK and LOW and the laptops from Dell. Guess I'm just lucky.. although I am very picky about parts I buy of course.

  11. #11
    D.M
    D.M is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    • D.M's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X w/Noctua NH-D15 Chromax Black
      • Memory:
      • 32GB (4x8) Team Group 8Pack 3,600MHz CL16 (Samsung B-Die)
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent Rocket 512GB NVMe + Sabrent Rocket 1TB NVMe + 1TB Seagate Barracuda 7,200RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Radeon RX 5700XT Nitro+ Special Edition
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova P2 1200W Platinum
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Eclipse P600S - White
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer XZ321QU 32" 144Hz 1440p FreeSync Curved
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Component reliability

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit View Post
    Its a good thing we have e-tailers such as scan and ebuyer to make up for the suppliers lacking standards
    True, True!

  12. #12
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Component reliability

    Quote Originally Posted by staffsMike View Post
    I havn't had a single problem with 5 new different builds and 3 new laptops in the last year..

    Mostly from scan, a bit from OCUK and LOW and the laptops from Dell. Guess I'm just lucky.. although I am very picky about parts I buy of course.
    God knows how many builds i have done over the past year but my record has been pretty decent also. 1 faulty motherboard 2 faulty hard drives and thats it!

  13. #13
    Getting old...
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    You Want To Ask That?
    Posts
    2,568
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked
    93 times in 89 posts
    • UseItNow's system
      • Motherboard:
      • It's holding everything together!
      • CPU:
      • It's in my PC
      • Memory:
      • It's remembering, alright?
      • Storage:
      • It's a hard drive, what more do you want?
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Cr*p, there I said it!
      • PSU:
      • It's old and juicy!
      • Case:
      • Bog standard!
      • Operating System:
      • You Got To Ask? I'm here at Hexus because of it!
      • Monitor(s):
      • Big Enough, Yay For Me!
      • Internet:
      • Hell if I know, care anymore?

    Re: Component reliability

    Quote Originally Posted by staffsMike View Post
    I havn't had a single problem with 5 new different builds and 3 new laptops in the last year..

    Guess I'm just lucky.. although I am very picky about parts I buy of course.
    It does seem to be very much the case for myself too, touch wood. It would seem that being picky about the components you choose for a build can in fact save you a lot of headache.

    As Biscuit says, with more and more transistors being added, the likelihood of failure is that more likely but as a result you could think that QA might be falling as the level of complexity in component build increases.

  14. #14
    Lover & Fighter Blitzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Between Your Mum & Sister
    Posts
    6,310
    Thanks
    539
    Thanked
    382 times in 300 posts
    • Blitzen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ABIT iX38 QuadGT
      • CPU:
      • Intel Quad Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz : 30 Degrees Idle - 41-46 Degrees Load
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 1GB OCZ Platinum PC6400 @ 4-4-4-12
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 500GB Samsung Spinpoints - RAID 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 285
      • PSU:
      • Enermax MODU 82+ 625W
      • Case:
      • Antec Nine Hundred
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate 64Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic Q22wb 22" Widescreen - 5ms
      • Internet:
      • O2 premium @ 17mb

    Re: Component reliability

    Things have changed in the last 5 years.
    The reliability of the components hasnt but the QA/QC procedures have.

    I have been in the electronics industry on/off for the best part of my civilian working life (around 10 years) and here's why things have changed.

    The 'fall-out' in production has nearly always been at around 9%. Not the PCB's or the seperate parts. Its the finished product boxed and ready.

    Thing is, with the Far Eastern markets, they only have a AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) test. This means, depending on the standard followed, that maybe only 1 out of every 30 units is tested in a 500 units batch. This keeps manufacturing costs down but inevitably leads to higher failures in the field.

    THIS is the price you pay for buying abroad.

    In the UK manufacturing the AQL would be, on a 100 batch, usually 15-20 per 100 tested. So, although not fool proof, it will usually spot errors more frequently.
    Unfortunately though, to have any chance of competing with the foreign markets, we too have had to drop our batch testing levels to bring the costs down.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I went to South Korea in 2002 to a VERY well known electronics manufacturer which is based there.
    When i was on the plant tour, the Manufacturing Director told me that they have a 100% pass rate leaving their factory.
    We all know that its impossible to get 1st time right every time.

    This is how they achieved a 100% success rate upon finished goods leaving.........they had a manufacturing floor about 4 times the size of an aircraft hangar and there was faulty units/parts EVERYWHERE.
    The other side of the plant they had another building that was at least 5 times the size of the manufacturing unit.
    Know what it was??????

    The rework station.....all the scrap (mustve been 30-40% of all manufactured product), ended up there to be reworked and shipped.

  15. #15
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    small village in England
    Posts
    89
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • acro666's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit Fatal1ty AA8XE
      • CPU:
      • Pen 4 CSU, 775 3.6ghz 2mb cache
      • Memory:
      • 3gb DDR 2
      • Storage:
      • 4 HDs split into 16 individuals
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gainward GForce 7800TX 256 DDR3
      • PSU:
      • 750 watts
      • Case:
      • Lian Li Brushed Aluminium
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x AOC 17" Flat Panel
      • Internet:
      • aol

    Re: Component reliability

    So please, how do SCAN rate for sending out reliable parts, and how good is their RMA system?

    regards

    acro666

  16. #16
    finding nemo staffsMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,498
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    794 times in 741 posts
    • staffsMike's system
      • Motherboard:
      • evga 680i
      • CPU:
      • e6600
      • Memory:
      • geil ultra pc6400
      • Storage:
      • WD 320gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • leadtek 8800 GTS 640mb
      • PSU:
      • ocz gameXstream 700w
      • Case:
      • akasa eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • dell 2007wfp and Lg L194WT
      • Internet:
      • pipex homecall

    Re: Component reliability

    I'd regard scan very highly at both personally although the RMA process is only being judged by what I have heard because i've never had to use it.. such is the quality of parts that get sent

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 29-03-2008, 03:36 PM
  2. Looking for monitor to support component, VGA and sound?
    By Craig321 in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19-03-2008, 08:42 PM
  3. Component Splitting
    By fraggie in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17-01-2008, 12:35 PM
  4. DVI vs component video
    By jamena in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 27-03-2006, 09:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •