Sorry i keep forgetting i changed the board to the P5E lol , My ed mark is just under 12000 why would you love to see it? that is 3d mark 06 btw
My 2GB of crucial ballistix 800mhz get 5.9 unclocked. From what I've heard and seen as well, I wouldn't be too bothered about the ratings either. Although I have been trying to overclock my cpu to get a perfect 5.9 score....
Last edited by rufeo; 24-03-2008 at 10:17 PM.
I have everything at 5.9 except for the HDD which is 5.7. What HDDs get 5.9?
I have a western dig wd5000aaks and that gets 5.9 got 5,9 in my xps with the western digital too, but with a seagate it got like 5.4 or 5.2
Ive got two sticks of 1gb 533 mhz DDR 4200 (ebuyer value so not branded as such) ram and i get a score of 5.9 so i wouldnt worry too much. Everything is at 5.9 apart from my processor...should upgrade
My old PC3200 gets better marks than my macbook with PC5300. Ratings are usless completely disregard them
right.. i've noticed that a few people here are running the OCZ platiunum rev. 2.. i have this RAM, scored 5.9 all round before i formatted and installed Vista, now it's scoring 5.4 :S does anyone know why this is? i would like a 5.9 all-round if that's possible
Good God I can't believe people are actually taking notice of Vista ratings.... WORRYING about them even.
ASUS ROG G751 w. 980M
Put it this way. My memory (for reference, 8gb Corsair 800MHz C5) scored 5.6 or something when this PC was first set up. A few installs later for drivers and things and it magically went up to 5.9. Generally benchmarks have little relevance. The Vista benchmarks have none whatsoever.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)