Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 37

Thread: 2.1 vs 5.1?

  1. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Cornwall/Weston-Super-Mare
    Posts
    5,337
    Thanks
    438
    Thanked
    309 times in 262 posts
    • Behemoth's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte mATX
      • CPU:
      • Phenom 2 X2 555 BE
      • Memory:
      • 8 Gig DDR3 Corsair XMS 3 1600 MHz
      • Storage:
      • 4 TB's Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 OC2
      • PSU:
      • OCZ StealthStream 2 600 Watt
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64 Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP x23LED
      • Internet:
      • BT Broadband

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    Would sooner go Logitech now after reading about the current creative labs screw up with software drivers, shan't be spending my money with them ever again.

  2. #18
    Senior Member crazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    845
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked
    50 times in 26 posts
    • crazy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P5Q-E
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 G0 @ 3.2ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair DDR2
      • Storage:
      • Raptor X 150GB & 1TB Samsung HD103UJ
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 260
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Infiniti 720W
      • Case:
      • Antec P182 SE
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2410 & 2007WFP

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    if the creative's T40 are really good then i'm not too bothered about their whole mess up on the software side

    are there any other recommendations?.
    for me it is currently between the z2300 and T40

  3. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    3,041
    Thanks
    209
    Thanked
    146 times in 88 posts

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    Personally, I'd go for the T40s. Enough pondering, you know it makes sense, buy buy buy.

    We want to see pictures and a mini-review by Friday at the latest!

  4. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    633
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked
    82 times in 61 posts
    • Uriel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3
      • CPU:
      • Athlon X2 5200+ 45nm 2.3GHz @ Phenom FX-5200 3.3GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (4x2GB) Geil RAM
      • Storage:
      • 480GB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Galax GTX970 4GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Antec SLK3000B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407wfp A04

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    I don't understand how people could go back to gaming with stereo speakers after using surround sound. Makes a huge difference.

  5. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    684
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uriel View Post
    I don't understand how people could go back to gaming with stereo speakers after using surround sound. Makes a huge difference.
    Because it's all the mess with wires that 5.1 system creates and the space it takes up.

  6. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Carlisle
    Posts
    4,121
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked
    368 times in 278 posts
    • matty-hodgson's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit IP35 Dark Raider
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 4GHz (59'C Under a TRUE Black)
      • Memory:
      • 4GB OCZ DDR2 890MHz (5-4-4-15)
      • Storage:
      • Intel 80GB - Games. Intel 80GB - OS. 1TB Samsung - Storage.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA Zotac GTX 275: 728 Core, 1614 Shader, 1340 Memory
      • PSU:
      • Enermax MODU82+ 625w
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SM2343BW (2048x1152)
      • Internet:
      • Smallworld 4Mbps

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lucio View Post
    I just wish they'd make some affordable 5.1 wireless speakers. It'd be handy for most people, so you could stick the rear ones on your chair
    totally agree.. some rear speakers strapped to your chair (40 yr old virgin style) would be awesome!

  7. #23
    Senior Member crazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    845
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked
    50 times in 26 posts
    • crazy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P5Q-E
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 G0 @ 3.2ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair DDR2
      • Storage:
      • Raptor X 150GB & 1TB Samsung HD103UJ
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 260
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Infiniti 720W
      • Case:
      • Antec P182 SE
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2410 & 2007WFP

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    Quote Originally Posted by Parm View Post
    Personally, I'd go for the T40s. Enough pondering, you know it makes sense, buy buy buy.

    We want to see pictures and a mini-review by Friday at the latest!
    maybe i will do when i get them ( maybe few weeks or few months) whichever ones i go for.
    swaying towards the t40's but the 'THX' symbol keeps on pulling me back towards the z2300
    not really sure whether to get speakers might even go for headphones as my primary use will be gaming.

  8. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    172
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • tom18230's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit Dark Raider IP-35
      • CPU:
      • Intel Q6600 2.7gHz
      • Memory:
      • OCZ DDR2 4GB (2 x 2GB)
      • Storage:
      • Western Digital 500GB 7500RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 640mb 8800GTS
      • PSU:
      • CorsaiR HX520W
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Home Premium 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 22LS4D
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 2mb

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    Only get 5.1 if you have the space. I was going to get surround sound, but realised I didn't have enough room for the speakers. 2.1 is always a good bet.
    I could take on 28 five year old kids in a fight.
    I could name 55 countries in 5 minutes.
    My body makes a 58% effective human shield.
    My dead body is worth £5750.
    I have a 41% chance of surviving a zombie apocalypse.
    Im 40% geek.

  9. #25
    finding nemo staffsMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,498
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    794 times in 741 posts
    • staffsMike's system
      • Motherboard:
      • evga 680i
      • CPU:
      • e6600
      • Memory:
      • geil ultra pc6400
      • Storage:
      • WD 320gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • leadtek 8800 GTS 640mb
      • PSU:
      • ocz gameXstream 700w
      • Case:
      • akasa eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • dell 2007wfp and Lg L194WT
      • Internet:
      • pipex homecall

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    A like the look of those logitechs.. reading a few customer reviews though it seems they are great at base and lack luster elsewhere. This is where the gigaworks sell themselves for me.

    The bass isn't huge but it's there, warm and it stays nice and clear however much you use. The mids and treble are excellent though, they really are a pleasure.

    this is the T20's though i've never heard T40's

    I think if the use is primarily games the locitechs will be the way to go, anything else the T40's.

  10. Received thanks from:

    crazy (07-04-2008)

  11. #26
    Senior Member crazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    845
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked
    50 times in 26 posts
    • crazy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P5Q-E
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 G0 @ 3.2ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair DDR2
      • Storage:
      • Raptor X 150GB & 1TB Samsung HD103UJ
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 260
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Infiniti 720W
      • Case:
      • Antec P182 SE
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2410 & 2007WFP

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    primary use is gaming that is why i'm still considering headphones (except they always seem to stop working after a while)

    ill give it some more thought and will let you guys know when i actually set out to buy them

    thanks for all the responses

  12. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    684
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    Quote Originally Posted by crazy View Post
    primary use is gaming that is why i'm still considering headphones (except they always seem to stop working after a while)

    ill give it some more thought and will let you guys know when i actually set out to buy them

    thanks for all the responses
    Well if you are going to go for headphones then you can't go wrong with either Medusa or Steel Series headphones for around £50-60.

  13. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    633
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked
    82 times in 61 posts
    • Uriel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3
      • CPU:
      • Athlon X2 5200+ 45nm 2.3GHz @ Phenom FX-5200 3.3GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (4x2GB) Geil RAM
      • Storage:
      • 480GB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Galax GTX970 4GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Antec SLK3000B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407wfp A04

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    A couple of things on the Medusas. One is they have a nasty habit of picking up interference - say mobile phones or wi-fi. You can work around it (but not entirely eliminate it) by turning up the amp and turning down the in-line controls. The other is using them with a soundcard that can control bass crossover frequency makes a huge improvement. Makes them go from sounding cheap and nasty to rivalling some of the stereo headsets in the same price range. Speedlink recommend that it be set to 100Hz. They don't really work as well as surround speakers but I find the effect better than Dolby Headphone or CMSS solutions.

  14. #29
    Synergy leverager
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    /dev/dsk/c1d0s7
    Posts
    1,051
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    31 times in 27 posts
    • Mutley's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit IP-35 Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel QX9650 (OC'd to 3.8Ghz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (4x2GB) G.Skill DDR2-1066 8500CL5D
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840EVO 250GB SSD & Samsung HD501LJ 500GB SATA
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX 660
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Infiniti 650W
      • Case:
      • Antec P-182
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC 20WGX2
      • Internet:
      • 60MB Cable (Virgin)

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uriel View Post
    A couple of things on the Medusas. One is they have a nasty habit of picking up interference - say mobile phones or wi-fi. You can work around it (but not entirely eliminate it) by turning up the amp and turning down the in-line controls. The other is using them with a soundcard that can control bass crossover frequency makes a huge improvement. Makes them go from sounding cheap and nasty to rivalling some of the stereo headsets in the same price range. Speedlink recommend that it be set to 100Hz. They don't really work as well as surround speakers but I find the effect better than Dolby Headphone or CMSS solutions.
    Thats good to know. I have the Medusa's and always thought they sounded inadequate! Not done much to fiddle with the setup.

    As for speaker choice, as others have said, IF you can position the speakers appropriately, and IF you can route the cables so they are not a massive safety hazard, get 5.1 speakers. I have the Logitech Z-640s (quite old now). They are excellent for gaming, you can't beat the immersion. They're pretty crap for music though, but so are virtually all 5.1 speaker systems frankly.

    I'd also agree with avoiding 2.1s as they rarely get the balance right with the sub, unless you look at some decent kit like the Aego M's - very nice. Big sub though.

    I have to say though, I disagree with what others have said about the T20 and T40. Well, the T40 I can't speak about really, but I have the T-20s. Not impressed at all. Sounded like cheaper ordinary 2.0 speakers to me. Mushy bass, flat midrange, tinny top end. However, we all hear differently!

    Just my tuppence.

  15. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    633
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked
    82 times in 61 posts
    • Uriel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3
      • CPU:
      • Athlon X2 5200+ 45nm 2.3GHz @ Phenom FX-5200 3.3GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (4x2GB) Geil RAM
      • Storage:
      • 480GB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Galax GTX970 4GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Antec SLK3000B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407wfp A04

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    Another thing on the Medusas: the older sets have a switch for CD (stereo) and DVD(5.1) on the in line controls. I believe that some models don't have this switch. If you want to listen to music with them, set to CD and listen through a hi-fi amp. Unbelievable difference and it elimitates interference entirely. Just goes to show that the Medusa headphone amp is actually pretty poor. Without a hi-fi amp or setting the bass crossover, I wouldn't consider them for music.

  16. #31
    bored out of my tiny mind malfunction's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Lurking
    Posts
    3,923
    Thanks
    191
    Thanked
    187 times in 163 posts
    • malfunction's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte G1.Sniper (with daft heatsinks and annoying Killer NIC)
      • CPU:
      • Xeon X5670 (6 core LGA 1366) @ 4.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 48GB DDR3 1600 (6 * 8GB)
      • Storage:
      • 1TB 840 Evo + 1TB 850 Evo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 290X
      • PSU:
      • Antec True Power New 750W
      • Case:
      • Cooltek W2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2715H

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    I picked up some T40s last night and am putting them through their paces this morning. So far I'm pretty pleased - they are a bit better than the cheaper 2.0 sets I've had in the past but they seem to be quite sensitive to the type of music you play. For what it's worth I don't think they are worth £60 considering that if you had an amp lying around you'd get much better speakers in the same ballpark (well maybe more like £100 but that's the same ballpark for me). I was actually considering a couple of cheap monitors (studio monitors) but even cheaper ones would have been far above the cost of the T40s. So far I've yet to settle on a single setting but have listened to:

    The Orb (Aunty Aubrey's). Quite good but needed to turn the bass down to 11 o'clock and the treble up to 2 o'clock.

    Bassement Jaxx - "Where's Your Head At?". A track that definitely misses a sub woofer! But not too bad on the T40s - better than I expected.

    Arctic Monkey's "Favourite Worst Nightmare". These needed a higher treble setting to avoid sound muffled - moved it up to 3 o'clock - unfortunately they do sound tinny with higher treble but better than the muffled (flat) lower settings for me

    I've got a pretty wide selection of music if anyone has any particular requests - just about everything apart from country and western! Note that I'm not exactly in the ideal listening environment (6' x 6' box room with the speakers either side of my monitor) and obviously it's very subjective but I'm happy to give my 2p if anyone wants it. For reference I haven't had speakers for quite some time and have been listening to music through full size headphones (fairly decent Sony ones) so I think I've got a pretty good reference point even if I do say so myself...

  17. #32
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    32
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • timizere's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit Ip35 dark raider
      • CPU:
      • intel c2d E6400 @2.13 oc 3.2
      • Memory:
      • 2Gig Corsair xms2 6400 @810
      • Storage:
      • 2x 250, 1x 320
      • Graphics card(s):
      • BFG nvid 8800Gts640 oc
      • PSU:
      • corsair 620
      • Case:
      • Antec P182
      • Monitor(s):
      • 17" IIyama

    Re: 2.1 vs 5.1?

    why does nobody on here ever recommend hifi seperates or powered monitors? slightly more expensive but leagues ahead of these little speaker sets.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Using 5.1 Speakers as 2.1 Speakers?
    By alexander in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 28-08-2007, 12:52 PM
  2. WMP music in 5.1 rather than 2.1...
    By Lowe in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 19-04-2006, 07:26 PM
  3. Wondering what my sound card is...2.1 or 5.1?
    By deeloughran in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 27-02-2006, 09:15 PM
  4. Good 2.1 or Average 5.1?
    By Merce101 in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22-09-2005, 01:50 AM
  5. 5.1 Questions
    By BorisTheSpider in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-10-2004, 11:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •