Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Overclocking and DRAM

  1. #1
    Senior Member stavroshamster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    York
    Posts
    528
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked
    53 times in 35 posts
    • stavroshamster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4Ghz G0 Stepping (O.C@3.3Ghz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair TwinX XMS2 PC2-6400
      • Storage:
      • Samsung HD753LJ Spinpoint F1 750GB + Samsung HD103SJ Spinpoint F3 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire AMD Radeon 7770
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX Series 520W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster CM690
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2412M (1920x1200)

    Overclocking and DRAM

    Okay,

    I have a Q6600 G0 overclocked to 3.3Ghz which I am very happy with.
    However, there are two ways to reach this speed and I am unsure which one is best?:

    1. FSB of 367Mhz and multiplier of 9 (367*9 = 3303Mhz), with memory ratio of 5:6 = memory speed at 440Mhz (using 4Gb DDR2-6400 Corsair XMS2)

    2. FSB of 413Mhz and multiplier of 8 (413*8 = 3304Mhz), with memory ratio of 1:1 = memory speed at 413Mhz

    My question is which is better to use? I have read that using a 1:1 memory ratio is better (i.e. option 2), but given that the memory is supposed to be running faster with option 2 is the uneven ratio going to slow it down? Is 440Mhz too fast to be running the memory anyway? Option 1 in theory should be less power hungry shouldn't it?? as the processor switches to a 6x multiplier when idle which means it is running slower when idle.

    Cheers.

  2. #2
    Keep it sexy Zhaoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    1,527
    Thanks
    234
    Thanked
    126 times in 106 posts

    Re: Overclocking and DRAM

    I'd go with Option B for 2 very important reasons:

    1) Intel CPUs (particularly quad cores) are very FSB starved: a higher FSB at the same CPU clock will always outperform a low FSB at the same CPU clock.

    2) The FSB is the speed at which the CPU communicates with the memory, therefore a 1:1 ratio is optimal. Set the memory lower and you lose performance, setting the memory higher won't gain any advantages.

    Hope that helps

  3. #3
    Scan Computers - Tech pands@scan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Manc land!
    Posts
    843
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    10 times in 10 posts

    Re: Overclocking and DRAM

    option 2 all the way laddo!
    pands.goggles


  4. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    East Yorkshire
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Arminas's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI Infinity Blood Iron P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Quad Q660 @ 3.2Ghz
      • Memory:
      • OCZ 4x1GB PC6400 CL4
      • Storage:
      • 2x250GB Seagate in RAID 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 9800GTX
      • PSU:
      • Xigmatek Modular NRP-MC651 650W
      • Case:
      • NZXT Tempest
      • Monitor(s):
      • TFT 19" Yuraku
      • Internet:
      • Karoo 8MB (supposedly ¬_¬)

    Re: Overclocking and DRAM

    Option two seems better for the reasons above.
    and the clock is a whole 1 Mhz higher

  5. #5
    Senior Member stavroshamster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    York
    Posts
    528
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked
    53 times in 35 posts
    • stavroshamster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5Q Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4Ghz G0 Stepping (O.C@3.3Ghz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair TwinX XMS2 PC2-6400
      • Storage:
      • Samsung HD753LJ Spinpoint F1 750GB + Samsung HD103SJ Spinpoint F3 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire AMD Radeon 7770
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX Series 520W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster CM690
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2412M (1920x1200)

    Re: Overclocking and DRAM

    Thanks guys!

    Option 2 it is.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. C2D Overclocking Guide For Beginners P5K Add-On
    By Clunk in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 638
    Last Post: 28-07-2016, 10:13 AM
  2. HOWTO: Overclock C2D Quads and C2D Duals - A Guide v1.0
    By graysky in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 08-10-2008, 07:44 PM
  3. Problems with overclocking!
    By runark in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 18-04-2008, 03:21 PM
  4. Overclocking reassurance.
    By CrackEdd in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-04-2008, 07:02 PM
  5. E6600 Overclocking project - Experianced eye required!
    By rss1979 in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 08-02-2007, 03:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •