Is it worth paying all that extra for the Q9400? the Q6600 has a decent amount of cache and is an easy over clocker, goes to 3.0Ghz easy and a whole lot more if you tweak.
Mind you... looks like you have the money to spend, nice spec.
Is it worth paying all that extra for the Q9400? the Q6600 has a decent amount of cache and is an easy over clocker, goes to 3.0Ghz easy and a whole lot more if you tweak.
Mind you... looks like you have the money to spend, nice spec.
___________________________________________________________
System 1: Case: Antec 900 Motherboard: Asus Z77 CPU: Core i5 3570K @3.4GHz RAM:8Gb DDR3 1600Mhz GFX: XFX AMD Radeon 6950 2Gb (Cayman) HDD: Samsung Spinpoint 500GB O/S: Windows 7 64bit Home Premium
System 2: Lenovo Ideapad S205: AMD E350 APU (1.6Ghz), 2Gb 1066Mhz DDR3, Radeon HD6310 (integrated), 250Gb HDD, Windows 7 64Bit Home Premium
System 3:Asus Eee 901: 12Gb Ubuntu 10.10 Gnome Desktop edition
oh also, my cpu always displays -64^c anyway to solve it?!?! i did use a different monitor thingy, but i really want SpeedFan to control everything i like the interface..
Right this is going to be the final spec.....
Was going to downgrade the CPU but for the sake of saving a few quid, i though i'd just go with the 2.6 and if i feel like oc'ing i'll go from there.
Quality, Aluminium and general size
Although that one is a bit too small and expensive for it's price.
I'd get the full tower version instead.
With the case, make sure its got ample headroom for upgrades. I've learnt that not getting a bigger case can be very troublesome later down the line, the hard way!
The CM-690 would be perfect.
Oh and if you're spending that much on a fan, get a noctua 120mm.
Last edited by Oobie-; 08-01-2009 at 03:54 PM.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)