What benefits are there from using water cooling as opposed to air cooling a CPU etc? Are the temps much better with water cooling? looking at some review sites some heatsinks / fans give really good cooling these days!
What benefits are there from using water cooling as opposed to air cooling a CPU etc? Are the temps much better with water cooling? looking at some review sites some heatsinks / fans give really good cooling these days!
I'm no expert, but in simple terms a watercooling system can remove much more heat (it's all down to the physics of heat transfer, very dull). That said, there's limits to what watercooling can do (based on ambient temperatures etc.) and in normal usage you probably wouldn't see much benefit against air cooling except in noise (WC uses less, and larger, fans, generally - so less fan noise). The benefits really kick in if you start overclocking: your components will generate more heat the harder you push them, and water cooling can dissipate that extra heat a lot better than air cooling.
Last edited by scaryjim; 31-03-2009 at 12:10 PM. Reason: typos, as usual
It depends on what you intend to do and your budget.
Watercooling can give lower temps and noise, but is expensive and labour intensive to do right.
Air cooling is much cheaper and nowadays more than capable of cooling even the hottest CPU's on the market quietly.
Personally I wouldn't consider watercooling until I'd run out of actual hardware to spend the money on.
What are you planning to watercool, what's your budget, what case do you have, are you planning a large overclock? These all play a factor in deciding, I'm sure with more details people will be throwing suggestions at you.
Fair enough: like I said, I'm not the expert
What does the extra £100 buy you? As far as I can see I could get a CPU block, a northbridge block, a reasonable rad and a res / pump combo plus fittings / tubes for about £100... (assuming I'm watercooling without discrete graphics, for now )
Water cooling is very expensive to do right.
Radiator £60 - £80
Pump £60
CPU water block £50
GPU water block £60 - £100
Reservoir £20 -£30
Fans £5 - £10 each
Fittings + pipe + coolant etc. £20- £30
BUT
when you have done it right it is very rewarding.
Yup, the difference between doing water cooling on the cheap and doing it properly is quite a lot.
In some cases I have seen, cheap water cooling was giving no better results then the (much cheaper) air cooling it replaced.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
I agree
If you only have a small budget then get good air cooling as opposed to poor water cooling.
If you had a TRUE and a good fan(s) you would get better temperatures than an 'all in one water setup'.
Cheap water cooling is false economy.
Assuming all new parts, spending anything less than £150 (ideally £200+) on a water cooling setup is a waste of time. You simply won't be getting high enough quality parts to make it worthwhile. Water cooling a PC is for enthusiasts (ie. Enjoy it a lot and have the time to dedicate to it) or those with money to spare. Bang for buck, water cooling is never worth it unless you have specific needs (ie. noise).
Every PC I've built for myself the past 6+ years has been water cooled and I would never go back to air. I simply can't stand the noise from an overclocked, high spec system that air cooling produces. Even my HTPC is water cooled but then it's also gaming spec. A top end air solution will never compare to a top water (price aside) though. I have yet to see an air cooled GFX solution for a top end, current generation card that could compete with a full face water block.
I've cast a very brief eye over watercooling now and then, but purely out of geeky interest.
I've OC'd my processor to an acceptable level without compromising the low noise levels of my PC and I've done it a lot cheaper than it would cost for watercooling.
I'd love to try it out one day but until I have a LOT of spare money, I won't be.
moogle (31-03-2009)
I agree with everything above, anything less than a £200 WC setup can equalled in performance by a £40 air cooler. And you have to be overclocking quite heavily to see much benefit anyway. The noise benefit is debatable, pumps and fans still make easily audible noise.
On the other hand it is a fun project to have a go at (nerve wracking the first time you fill it!) and it does provide a good deal of e-peen.
Saw a review a couple of days back with a water cooled graphics card versus an air-cooled and the air-cooled achieved the higher overclock - obviously a better chip.
As said previously, you're probably better off hurling everything you can at hardware until watercooling actually becomes necessary.
I did it and I haven't regretted it - less noise, less heat in the case (my rad is external) and substantial drops in temps. That said, I did it right and no, it isn't cheap but it's quite a lot of fun
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)