OCZ do this.
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/sho...px?i=3702&p=10
Bl**dy hell.
OCZ do this.
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/sho...px?i=3702&p=10
Bl**dy hell.
Society's to blame,
Or possibly Atari.
Still too expensive though!!
Yes new tech, it's the new controller that's interesting. This isn't an OCZ innovation but a company called Sandforce. Their Durawrite method is very interesting as an alternative to Intel, despite it's drawbacks. What we're seeing is a fork.
And yes - they're all too expensive.
Society's to blame,
Or possibly Atari.
It is good to see more competition in the market though!!
Aye - Like the man said "Competition is a good thing. We need companies to not only keep Intel aggressive on price, but competitive on features as well. Indilinx did the former and it looks like SandForce is going to do the latter"
Society's to blame,
Or possibly Atari.
I find the obsession about which controller and memory chips are being used in any given SSD quite interesting.
I wonder if this was the same at any point with hard dives. Surely it doesn't matter what controller or read/write technology is used in them, as long as the price or performance is there? You don't need to know what goes on inside a regular hard drive, as long as it works as you expect it to.
There's the rub. This is a new method of writing to the NAND pages. Sandforce use data compression and other super-sekret stuff to write to less blocks. However, this will only work if your data is uncompressed. If you already deal in compressed data, you will not see the benefit, and could therefore save a lot of cash.
Similarly, you would benefit from knowing that the Jmicron controller was much worse than the Indilinx and that using the first Intel TRIM update was a risky business.
I rather thought this sort of information was the point of an enthusiast site. You could say the same thing about any of the components in a modern home computer, or the whole system. Just buy any box, anything over £750 will do more than you need, why worry about the components ?
Society's to blame,
Or possibly Atari.
I'd already posted this link in the other SSD thread, performance is quite epic.
Kalniel: "Nice review Tarinder - would it be possible to get a picture of the case when the components are installed (with the side off obviously)?"
CAT-THE-FIFTH: "The Antec 300 is a case which has an understated and clean appearance which many people like. Not everyone is into e-peen looking computers which look like a cross between the imagination of a hyperactive 10 year old and a Frog."
TKPeters: "Off to AVForum better Deal - £20+Vat for Free Shipping @ Scan"
for all intents it seems to be the same card minus some gays name on it and a shielded cover ? with OEM added to it - GoNz0.
Thanks.
It's interesting I think because it is the bleeding edge and a fork would mean competition. Competition means better value for money. Better value for money means...<slap>.
Ok, I'm back now. Sorry about that.
Society's to blame,
Or possibly Atari.
It wasn't really this way with hard drives, as the performance characteristics between different methods remained the same. It's precisely the large effect on performance characteristics that's caused controllers to be thrust into the spotlight for SSDs - at some point it becomes clearer to talk about an SSD having an Intel, Indilinx or JMicron controller than it does to describe the performance across a whole suite of tests that show up the differences like seq. read/write, random read/write, large cluster, small cluster, performance over time etc.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)