Printable View
Hi all,
I'm planning to build a new PC for my Dad and wondered if buying a solid state hard drive is a good idea. Or would the money be better spent on something else, maybe a faster processor? It'll be largely used for office, email and internet type stuff. Any advice really appreciated :-)
Andy.
Whats your budget, and is it only for office? If so i would reccomend:
All from scan:
Samsung F1 320GB single platter.
Phenom II x2 550
Amd mobo any of the 7xx range with onboard gfx.
any DVD drive
2x2GB pc 6400 ram
antec 300 case for a nice look, any decent case as its your preference for looks.
Silverpower 400w psu, good company.
You can stick with stock cooler, or an aftermarket if you want it quieter.
If anyone else can better this please do, only a quick tot up.
I would say SSD's are not worth it, if your considering safety and reliability, maybe run a second drive exactly the same size, doing shadow copies?
An SSD wouldn't be far from necessary to tell you the truth. The cost of one is too high to be used in an office PC. What's your budget?
SSD in an office PC!!!! It is a tad OTT TBH and a normal hard disk will do the job fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by testbreakdown
This is what I would go for:
AMD Athlon II X2 245 ~ £49
http://www.scan.co.uk/TodayOnly/Index.aspx
Asus M3N78-VM Nvidia 8200 motherboard ~ £45
http://www.scan.co.uk/TodayOnly/Index.aspx
OR
Asus M3A76-CM 760G motherboard ~ £45
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Asus-...Board-VGA-HDCP
The 8200 based motherboard has more useful connections on the backplate IMHO.
4gb PC2-8500 DDR2 RAM ~ £34
http://www.scan.co.uk/TodayOnly/Index.aspx
500 GB Western Digital WD5000AAKS ~ £38
http://www.scan.co.uk/TodayOnly/Index.aspx
Coolermaster Elite 340 MicroATX Case with Coolermaster 460W PSU ~ £50
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Coole...60W-PSU-Fitted
Sony Lightscribe DVD writer ~ £17
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Sony-...ightscribe-OEM
The total comes to around £274 including postage. You will also need to add one or two 120mm fans for cooling. This PC should be more than powerful enough for office work and internet.
The Today Only offers during the weekend only last until 12 noon on Monday. If you have 20+ posts on Hexus you get free next day postage for orders over £20 excluding VAT on Scan.
Thanks for the recommendations!
Are SSD's not reliable yet then? I don't mind spending a bit more to get one if it's actually going to make a difference. Thinking around £500-£600 budget overall.
It's not that their unreliable, it just they're so expensive. Does it have to include monitor?Quote:
Originally Posted by testbreakdown
For high end work and high end gaming SSDs do make a difference but not for the purposes of the PC you assembling - it would be a colossal waste of money!Quote:
Originally Posted by testbreakdown
The spec I have suggested will do the job under Vista or Windows 7 fine and you will need to add another £50 to £100 to the budget for an OS.
If you do not mind running Windows 7 RC1 for a few months then you can get Windows 7 Home Premium for only £50 on pre-order:
http://www.ebuyer.com/special/1645?ref=dotd&hp_deal=10
I would put the rest of the money towards a nice 22" screen such as the following:
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/22-De...680x1050-10001
It has an E-IPS panel meaning deeper blacks and good viewing angles unlike the cheaper TN type panels.
Also get a decent keyboard and mouse too.
Yep, that budget was for monitor and software if possible.
OK, reckon I'll drop the SSD then thanks.
Is it worth getting a lower-spec motherboard plus a cheap graphics card, rather than on-board graphics do you think? That monitor looks really nice :-)
Cheap as chips, I recently gave my dad his first proper computer (my old Athlon 3200/2gb/80gb IDE) - he'd been attempting to use an Win ME machine his missus bought from PC world 7 years ago (against my advice), wouldn't even recognise a USB device despite having 4 ports on the front!
He's learnt how to use Gmail & Google. Poor sod thinks that Google is the 'internet'. At 65, if I can learn how to navigate the equivalent of the internet I'll be happy. Go dad!
He thinks it is the best thing since sliced bread. Using my very old 7800gs, it can render any page lightning fast, and he can multi-task without an issue.
Excellent, I'm hoping for a similar story :-) Hats off to all the Dads out there who like to give it a go.
AMD Onboard solutions are very good, can do most things their basic standalone cards can.Quote:
Originally Posted by testbreakdown
Or £45 from Dixons: http://www.dixons.co.uk/martprd/prod...nt=hp-top-win7Quote:
Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH
Lol, your dad sounds much like mine. The other day he called me down because the internet was broken on my brother's user - the home page was not google, and he did not know how to use it:P.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteGiant
Fair enough, I just thought the difference in price wouldn't be that much. That ASUS board recommended by CAT-THE-FIFTH looks like very good value though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackmage
I resemble that remark. I'm a Dad, and not that far from 65. And you know what, there were computers being used in business even before I went to Uni (OK they were the size of a planet and looked after by men in white coats, but...) to do a degree in Maths & Computer Science.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteGiant
OK so some older people might have had their heads in the sand over the last 20 years, or are scared of technology, but there are also 80 year olds doing all sorts of things with their computers. Reaching 60 doesn't make you brain dead - some people were like that all along.
For the price I would go for the Asus M3N78-VM which has the Nvidia 8200 series chipset over the Asus M3A76-CM which has the AMD 760G chipset. The 8200 has better video acceleration features over the 760G.Quote:
Originally Posted by testbreakdown
Asus M3N78-VM
http://usa.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...68&modelmenu=1
http://usa.asus.com/999/images/produ...78-VM_back.jpg
Asus M3A76-CM
http://usa.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...65&modelmenu=1
http://usa.asus.com/999/images/produ...M3A76-CM_B.jpg
Yep,I agree with you entirely as I know older family members who love using computers and find them very useful and love having the latest tech!Some of them have used computers in 1970s too which were HUGE and joked how a modern calculator probablyt had more RAM!! :lol: It does take them a bit longer than younger people for them to get used to using new tech but the enthusiasm is there! Once you are geek you tend to stay one for the rest of your life methinks! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorsson
Great, thanks a lot :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH
I didn't realise Windows 7 was so cheap, so now I'm wonderering whether or not to wait for that. Thing is, which is more Dad-friendly: XP, Vista or Windows 7? :undecided
indeed my dad's in his 60's now, he built our first computer, a uk101, it involved him buying a circuit diagram, a whole bunch of resistors, transistors, capasitors and such, then soilderd it all together.
He did have to buy a keyboard, but not a case (He though the plastic cases where not worth it) instead he built one out of wood.
Back to the topic, as has already been said
1: SSD is to expensive and will not really do much for just for an office, e-mail and internet pc
2: The AMD 7xx and nVidia 8xxxx onboard graphics will be fine for this, if anything it's slightly overpowered for just office & internet, However as you've noticed they are cheap while still being good.
Monitor, personally I much prefur a standard 4:3 ratio monitor for internet & office than a wide screen.
20.1" Iiyama non-wide screen
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/201-I...ts-1600-x-1200
also a highend monitor with IPS panel is not really that needed, but a good TN panel is fine
22" Hyundai widescreen
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/22-Hy...DVI-HDCP-10001
the other thing to consider is his eye sight, running these monitors at full res maybe too fine for his eyes ie too many pixels per inch making text harder to see
So you may wish to consider 19" screens instead, while only very slightly smaller (and taller than a 22" widescreen) they have a far lower pixel-per-inch count so while things will still be sharp (a single pixel) it will look bigger which is good when the old eyes start to go.
Nice looking and speced 19" Sony
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/19-So...0001-450-cd-m2
Or 19" Viewsonic, with very nice full height adjustable, tilt and pivot stand. (MVA panel)
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/19-Vi...250-cd-m2-VESA
A nice trick you can do here, that is done by print designers is to pivot the screen and use it that way (i.e. the sides become the top&bottom and the top&bottom become the sides), that way it's the same orintation as most paper. Ok this may not be of any use to your dad in this case but it's nice to have the option open and which way round you want the monitor is the sort of physical question he could grasp easily
Will you need new keyboard and mouse as well? Speakers? Printer?
it's all these bits as well as software which will easily push the overall budget up, if you take CAT's base unit at £274,
+ £16 for a couple of decent 120mm fans
+ £18 for keyboard and mouse http://www.ebuyer.com/product/160333
+ £120ish monitor
+ £50 OS
+ £70 MS office home & student edition (Word, Excel, PowerPoint)
or +£115 MS office pro (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Publisher, Access)
+ £26 Kaspersky InternetSecurity 2010 (anti-virus + anti-spyware + firewall)
+ £50 All-in-one printer (colour inkjet & scanner) http://www.ebuyer.com/product/150564
that's already up to £600-650 from a £274 starting price, although I would sugest cutting out MS office and use open office, it's free and is actually very good + it still looks like MS office 2003 or lower.
If he's used MS office before in the past he may get totally lost and confused by the layout change in office 2007 (strangely enough at work I've had a few people clamoring for 2007 and after installing it they've almost all asked for 2003 to be put back on as they cannot find anything in the new version because of the layout change :rolleyes: although not an issue if you've never used office in the first place)
Thatr's a low pre-order price to get people to buy it ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by testbreakdown
I'll have to check if this is correct, but I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong
you download a copy of the windows7 beta, and install that, buy a pre-order pack, then when it comes out you should be able to upgrade the beta with the pre-order pack so you don't have to reinstall it.
Do I gather that there is no "Ultimate" Windows 7? And do you really need to use the Beta, or can you just wait for the package to turn up in October?
More really useful advice, thanks Pob :-)
I need to speak to him about what monitor he'd prefer then. Perhaps a trip to PC world so we can test a few out.
Need speakers, mouse and keyboard but he already has a printer. Pretty sure he's used Office 2007 before so I'll go for the Home and Student version.
Yes there is an Ultimate version
Windows 7 Starter/home basic, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Enterprise, and Windows 7 Ultimate.
in both 64bit and 32bit versions
For just office and internet Windows7 Home Premium 64bit is the best bet.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2340338,00.asp
the reason for using the beta is haveing a working OS before October and not having to reinstall everything when it does come out. EDIT: Ok it looks like you can upgrade from vista without a full reinstall, but how successful it wil be is another matter and it will mean buying vista then buying windows 7
EDIT: I would seriously look at Open office, it can do everything that MS office does, includeing open and save MS office files, the only area it cannot do is Access (the database program) and it looks exactly the same as MS office 2003
And of course it's Free! :D
Why 64-bit? I couldn't find anything in that article (unless I missed it). I know there used to be driver issues on XP 64-bit, has that improved with Vista/Windows 7?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pob255
Right, I'll try Open Office then. Saves a bit of cash and I can always swap it for MS Office later if necessary I guess. Thanks :-)
OK, 7 Ultimate seems a waste of money. Professional (like XP) appears to be the best version, being Home Premium with some useful Network stuff. Unless I read it wrong.
You'll need to do more research to find out which is best for you
Rule of thumb
For just a home pc or a home adhock network, ie a couple of pc's shareing a printer or hard drive then home premium is fine
If you're connecting to a managed domain network (ie logging on to a server), then Pro version or better will be needed.
The differences between the versions is small but key, depending on your network structure, something like Applocker could be very useful on a managed network, how much use it is I don't know as I've not had the system to test it.
And unlike the cruddy xp 64bit both vista 64bit and window7 64bit work and work well, and you should look at 64bit versions if running 4gb or more memory.
That's good to know. I was thinking of 4GB memory maximum, are there any other benfits to going 64bit?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pob255
Sorry for the endless questions guys. You've already helped enormously :embarrassed:
It's the future! I know Paul Thurrock was quite surprised that Windows 7 even shipped in 32-bit versions. At the end of the day, 64-bit has the 4GB benefit, and as things stand virtually no negatives as compared to 32-bit, so there's just no reason to get 32-bit instead.Quote:
Originally Posted by testbreakdown
I'm sure somebody will tell me I'm wrong, and talk about unsigned drivers or something, but at the end of the day I don't think there's any compelling reason to take 32-bit instead of 64.
I was told that upgrades were disabled in the "E" editions that Europeans need, thanks to the recent EU ruling.......Quote:
Originally Posted by Pob255
Haven't got my hands on an "E" edition to test yet though.
OK: Windows 7 - it cannot be upgraded over the RC or Beta versions - get one of those and you'll be doing a clean install. Windows 7 E - the version licensed for sale in the EU - cannot be upgraded over a Windows Vista install, so you'll be doing a clean install. So, get Windows 7 RC now (the download is going to be closed soon) and preorder Windows 7 Home Premium as quickly as possible - you may already have missed the best deal (I recommend trying PC World which seems to be the place with the most copies going spare).
As far as 32 vs 64 goes, as I understand it you don't get hardware certification on Windows Vista / 7 unless you have both 32 and 64 bit drivers - so as long as you use certified hardware you'll not have any driver issues (I have a cheap generic USB wireless adapter that runs perfectly under Windows 7 64bit using the supplied Vista 64bit drivers, for example). At this point there is no disadvantage to going 64bit (32bit software runs just as smoothly under 64bit Windows), and it guaranatees you're ready for the point where some companies suddenly decide they're not going to write 32bit software anymore.
Pointless Aside - Windows 7 probably has a 32bit release to support Atom processors that don't have 64bit extensions. Besides, the 32bit market exists out there - why ignore it? An Atom 1.6GHz and 1GB of RAM runs Windows 7 smoothly (according to reviews / blogs / forum posts I've seen, anyway ;) ), and not releasing a 32bit version would keep Microsoft out of that very lucrative market! Besides, it also gives me the chance to try it on my old Athlon XP 2600+...
Based on what you say your advice would appear to be partly wrong. If you cannot upgrade over RC, then the best bet is to order non-E Windows 7 now, and forget the RC. Unless you want to do a clean install, when you might as well get the RC and not worry about the version of the full 7.Quote:
Originally Posted by scaryjim
I'm gathering that there's not to be an Upgrade version?