From the links it looks like 8 core, so 4 module. 8 module would be 16 core and should be a lot more than 50% faster than anything currently available - in multithreaded tasks, at least
If an 8 core is 50% faster than an i7 950, then a 6 core would only be about 12% faster, assuming perfect per-core scaling and a benchmark suite that uses all the cores. Given that the X6 1100T is not that far behind the i7 950 in single threaded tasks and just ahead of it in heavily threaded tasks, I'm actually not massively impressed at that. Essentially, if they release 6-core bulldozer at whatever clocks they ran these benchmarks, they'll only be 10% faster than the existing 6-core Thubans?
Of course, if these tests were conducted at the kind of clock speeds their entry level chips will be using, and they can clock them much higher for top end chips, then we have a different story. But until we see some figures that are actually comparative, I'm going to put the champagne back on ice...