Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 31

Thread: Athlon 64 Socket 939 Range

  1. #1
    iMc
    iMc is offline
    Senior Member iMc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Northants
    Posts
    3,616
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Athlon 64 Socket 939 Range

    I was just wondering if anyone knew what speeds AMD are releasing the 939 Athlon 64's at?
    HEXUS|iMc

  2. #2
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  3. #3
    iMc
    iMc is offline
    Senior Member iMc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Northants
    Posts
    3,616
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    So the lowest model is a 3500+.

    Basically i just want to find out the cheapest way into the Athlon64 S939 ballgame

    Think i'll be waiting a few months yet tho...
    HEXUS|iMc

  4. #4
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    I'm very tempted to enter the realm of Athlon64 - but I'm waiting for the 90nm parts. I think at this stage in the game it is a wise choice.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  5. #5
    iMc
    iMc is offline
    Senior Member iMc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Northants
    Posts
    3,616
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Yeh definitely. I mean socket 939 should be around for a couple of CPU generations now, including the introduction of the duel core cpus. I just want to get in with something as cheap as poss, which will still kick my system in the bottom! Then I will be able to keep upgrading for hopefully the next 2 years.

    Do you know when are AMD moving to the 90nm process?
    HEXUS|iMc

  6. #6
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    A good idea would be to wait for 64-bit to really hit the fan, it'll be cheaper and more useful by then.

  7. #7
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    I think its end of the year iMc - and 64bit Windaz should be out then... I hope.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  8. #8
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    Will 64-bit paint be included?

  9. #9
    mutantbass head Lee H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    M28, Manchester
    Posts
    14,204
    Thanks
    337
    Thanked
    671 times in 580 posts
    • Lee H's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z370 Carbon Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 8700K Unlocked CPU
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 LPX
      • Storage:
      • 250GB 960 EVO + a few more drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 6GB Palit GTX 1060 Dual
      • PSU:
      • Antec Truepower 750W Modular Blue
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T White Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 PRO
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" Asus MX279H & 24" Acer 3D GD245HQ + the 3D glasses
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media
    lol - I've been adding these to the works website today - how scary's that...

    I want a nice new FX-53 on the socket 939 but we can all dream lol

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    Quote Originally Posted by iMc
    Yeh definitely. I mean socket 939 should be around for a couple of CPU generations now, including the introduction of the duel core cpus. I just want to get in with something as cheap as poss, which will still kick my system in the bottom! Then I will be able to keep upgrading for hopefully the next 2 years.

    Do you know when are AMD moving to the 90nm process?
    I HIGHLY doubt 939 will be used for dual core cpus. They will likely need a whole new socket.

  11. #11
    iMc
    iMc is offline
    Senior Member iMc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Northants
    Posts
    3,616
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    well whatever happens i hope they stay with 939 for a good 2 years. they will just upset consumers if they keep changing every 9 months.
    HEXUS|iMc

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    939 will still be there, as will 754. They will just have something newer. I don't see the need to delay progress. I plan on sticking with 754 for a good while.

  13. #13
    iMc
    iMc is offline
    Senior Member iMc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Northants
    Posts
    3,616
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    in your opinion is it worth getting Althon 64 754 now or waiting till the 939 stuff comes down in price?
    HEXUS|iMc

  14. #14
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by iMc
    in your opinion is it worth getting Althon 64 754 now or waiting till the 939 stuff comes down in price?
    I'd say wait for the 939's and see how the field settles...
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    Well the fastest stock socket 754 will be the 3700+, 939 will have a longer life at the top end, but currently the performance difference really isn't there. 939 A64s (non-fx) are less than 5% faster overall comapaired to socket 754 chips of the same MHz. At this moment 754 is a better deal in my opinion, upgrading both cpu and motherbaord in the future is not that much more of a hassle as just upgrading the cpu, and everything else is compatable. Motherbaords tend to be far cheaper than midrange or highend cpus.

    I'll make up my mind for sure in a few days. I ordered a 1.2v mobile Athlon 64 2800+ wensday, if it overclock as well as I hope, I'll stay 754 for a good while as thats what the mobile chips will stay.

  16. #16
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    You make a good point there - I can't remember the last time I just bought a CPU and didn't upgrade mobo... oh hang on yes, I upgraded my K6 200 with a Cyrix MII 300
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-05-2004, 09:08 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25-01-2004, 11:49 PM
  3. Socket 754: Best Athlon 64 mobo pick
    By teckcin in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-12-2003, 09:48 PM
  4. AMD Athlon 64 3200 , VIA K8T800, nForce3 150
    By DR in forum HEXUS Reviews
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-10-2003, 08:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •