Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: AMD to release dual core processor

  1. #1
    Bonnet mounted gunsight megah0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    3,381
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked
    73 times in 49 posts

    AMD to release dual core processor

    AMD will release its dual-core processor for desktops in the second half of next year

    Advanced Micro Devices plans to release a dual-core processor for desktops in the second half of 2005, stepping up its schedule to better compete with Intel.

    The company has completed the design of a dual-core processor that will be sold as an Opteron chip for the server market and as an Athlon 64 chip for the desktop markets, said Barry Crume, a director in AMD's Opteron division.

    more Here
    Recycling consultant

  2. #2
    iMc
    iMc is offline
    Senior Member iMc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Northants
    Posts
    3,616
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    So this will be S939 or a new socket?

    Good news whatever.
    HEXUS|iMc

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    I highly doubt it will ever make it to 939, might have some that are 940 (first ones are going to be opterons), but will probably need a whole new socket. I've heard rumours of a socket 900.

  4. #4
    Senior Member SilentDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,745
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    16 times in 11 posts
    900? why would they decrease the pin count...? more is better. why not just keep ONE socket for all the chips (even if they are incompatable with some motherboards).

  5. #5
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by |SilentDeath|
    why not just keep ONE socket for all the chips (even if they are incompatable with some motherboards).
    That would be a nightmare.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    South Wales OR Southampton Uni
    Posts
    2,107
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    lol, yea that would be a good idea. You could just get a pile of chips and pop them in the socket to fry one after another until you find one that works

    But seriously, if you think about it, the reason that chips with the same sockets work with the same mobos is not just that they fit but because they work in the same way. So if in the future there are going to more flavours in the chip market there will be different interfaces/(Pin numbers) to go with them
    Last edited by Lexeus; 16-06-2004 at 08:00 PM.
    Desktop: AMD Athlon XP 2500+ Barton, 1024Mb PC-3200 TwinMOS w/Winbond, MSI K7N2 Delta-ILSR, Radeon 9800SE AIW, 40 GB 7,200 Rpm Hitachi Deskstar, 120GB 7,200 Rpm 8mb Cache Maxtor Diamond 9, 160GB 7200 Rpm 8mb Cache Seagate 7200.7 SATA, Plextor 708A 8x DVD-RW, 550W PFC Q-tec PSU, Casetek 1019SM Silver Case, Camdridge Soundworks DTT2200 Speakers

    Laptop: Clevo D470W - 17" Widescreen TFT, Intel Pentium4 3.06Ghz 533FSB, 1024Mb PC-2700 Hynix, Radeon Mobility 9000 64Mb, Fujitsu 80Gb 4,200rpm, 250Gb 7,2000rpm 8mb Cache Maxtor OneTouch, Toshiba SD-R6372 DVD-RW +/- x4, Built-in Four speakers, webcam and microphone

  7. #7
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lexeus
    lol, yea that would be a good idea. You could just get a pile of chips and pop them in the socket to fry one after another until you find one that works

    But seriously, if you think about it, the reason that chips with the same sockets work with the same mobos is not just that they fit but because they work in the same way. So if in the future there are going to more falvours in the chip market there will be different interfaces/(Pin numbers)
    Yeah, that's pretty much what I was thinking.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. what memory for a AMD Athlon 64 processor ?
    By chaoticone in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 21-04-2004, 10:23 PM
  2. AMD 64 Dual Channel Mem issues?
    By TiG in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13-01-2004, 09:05 PM
  3. Do you get an 'XP rating' applied when you o/c?
    By Austin in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 11-12-2003, 03:10 PM
  4. Cheap AMD dual boards ?
    By Agent in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 25-08-2003, 02:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •