Twinmos twister w.powerchip help

[Jesus]

Found some Twinmos Twister 433, but now i need help theyre equipped with
Powerchip WLCSP chips
As the seller told me the markings on the sticker are following

p/n: M2GIJ16AKATTIFO8359DW
MODEL: M2GIJ16A-TT
CL2.

any experineces with theese chips
DECLARED AT 2.0-3-3-8@ 2,8v @ 433MHz

Also into ocnsideration are ADAT Vitesta 500 declared 3.0-4-4-8@ 500Mhz, any experineces with those RAMs, would they run at 2.0-2-3-11 (2.0-3-3-11) 450-460Mhz

Which to choose

__________________

[nakajima]

dont know about the twinmos but i'd stay clear of it since you re using a NF2 board. Adata vitesta has had good reviews so i'd go for that

[megatron]

What is wrong with the ram u already have? That is more suitable than the adata. What can u overclock to?

[nakajima]

didnt see your sig before. I agree with megatron. You existing RAM is much better for your system than both the aDATa and twinmos

[Jesus]

Well the existing RAM defective some times its unstable at 400Mhz and Default timings, sometimes stable at 225 but then not for long. CH-6 **** chips on these corsairs. I'm very dissapointetd with those.

[BlackSheep]

RMA the bleeders

[megatron]

Well if u did buy some more ram then at least you would know if the ram was the problem. There could be alot of other things to do to try and make your pc stable, assuming the ram is not at fault.

[SilentDeath]

Its probably your mobo not the ram. Its rare for a nf7-s to get above 230mhz without mods. I have seen plenty struggle for 200.

[skattrd]

Personally I'd avoid Twinmos Twister - I RMA'd 6 sticks of it before eventually being given a refund.
The Adata vitesta is supposed to be great RAM for uber-high fsb's (280mhz+) - I have no idea about its ability at lower speeds/tighter timings, but I seriously doubt they would do cas2.0 at all.

[nakajima]

it might be because of the CPC enabled on your nf7-s causing instability above 200fsb