Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: A brief history of video cards: 64 GPUs tested from the last five years

  1. #1
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    A brief history of video cards: 64 GPUs tested from the last five years


  2. #2
    Senior Member Smudger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    St Albans
    Posts
    3,866
    Thanks
    674
    Thanked
    619 times in 451 posts
    • Smudger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gbyte GA-970A-UD3P
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX8320 Black Edition
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 2x8G CML16GX3M2A1600C10
      • Storage:
      • 1x240Gb Corsair M500, 2TB TOSHIBA DT01ACA200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon HD4890 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Akasa Zen
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 24"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 200Mbit

    Re: A brief history of video cards: 64 GPUs tested from the last five years

    I thought the benchmark for smooth playing was 30fps? Lucky I don't really play any modern games, my 4890 just wouldn't cope...

  3. #3
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: A brief history of video cards: 64 GPUs tested from the last five years

    Quote Originally Posted by Smudger View Post
    I thought the benchmark for smooth playing was 30fps? Lucky I don't really play any modern games, my 4890 just wouldn't cope...
    Depends on the kind of game. Something can look completely smooth at 24fps with correct motion blur, but you might notice the lag between your inputs and the rendered output. So games that need 'twitchy' controls are best at 60fps or higher, while more relaxed ones are fine at 30fps.

  4. #4
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: A brief history of video cards: 64 GPUs tested from the last five years

    I play a lot of third person RPG-type games, and most of those are pretty smooth at 30fps. Dungeon Seige 3 runs at a fairly consistent 24fps and is lush and smooth, but then I also used to run Torchlight at 25-35fps and considered it lush and smooth; then an upgrade took me to 45+fps and the difference was actually noticable. I suspect that's more to do with frame latencies though - techreport now benchmark games using frame render times rather than straight fps, and it's a bit of an eye opener A game running at an average 30fps where no frame takes longer than 40ms to render would probably appear smoother than a game with an average 30fps but a significant number of 50ms frames. It's not all down to average framerates


    EDIT: hmmm, perhaps it's time to say goodbye to the old 8800GTX ... even a 7750 can outpace it It'd be interesting to see benchmarks for the Trinity APUs in that little list - I doubt they're far behind my venerable old card...
    Last edited by scaryjim; 03-12-2012 at 05:13 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •