Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
5861: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/97130
Everything at stock.
Edit: Having to run all the tests is painful.
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terbinator
Edit: Having to run all the tests is painful.
Not quite as painful as paying £15 for it - when's the next steam sale?
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Website's down :rolleyes:
Think I'll put off running on my work laptop for a few minutes....
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PowerPie5000
.... Why do these results show incorrect CPU speeds?
This is probably due to the program ending and then gathering your pc specs when its back at its idle or less clocked speed.
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
6843: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/97452
CPU @ 5GHz, GPU +130/500.
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Interestingly, to me at least, my FX6300 @ 4.3GHz is thoroughly beaten by HalloweenJack's Phenom II X6 at 3.6 GHz in the physics test. I guess the physics test is heavily FPU intensive and so Vishera is hit hard by having half the number of FPUs, despite the clockspeed advantage.
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
OK, work laptop done, i7-2640M/HD3000 (DX10 only): http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/137519
Bit of an improvement from X4500, eh ;) Less than 1000 points behind the GTX 525m, not a bad showing from Intel (although compare the graphics scores and it's not so good - the better physics score from the i7 pulls the overall score up a bit).
Can't wait to do the HD4200 + Phenom II X4 and A6-3670k now ;)
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
6974: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/97619
GPU +150/600.
Edit: Time to gun for first place ;)
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terbinator
... Im contemplating a second 660ti
:innocent:
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biscuit
... Im contemplating a second 660ti
:innocent:
For your X4 to starve it? :P
I'm guessing the benchmark is better where AMD is concerned given the score difference between myself and Phage.
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terbinator
Edit: Time to gun for first place ;)
Looking at Chuckskull and RhinoUK you've got a fair bit of headroom on your GPU core!
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Damn - I thought it was my good looks and charm ! :naughty:
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Terbinator
For your X4 to starve it? :P
I'm guessing the benchmark is better where AMD is concerned given the score difference between myself and Phage.
I have a 3570K and GA-Z77X-UD5H waiting to be put together (I/O Plate is on the way) ;)
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bagnaj97
Looking at Chuckskull and RhinoUK you've got a fair bit of headroom on your GPU core!
Nar, mine craps out @ around +170 (so 1228 from stock of 1058) on the core depending on the benchmark.
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biscuit
I have a 3570K and GA-Z77X-UD5H waiting to be put together (I/O Plate is on the way) ;)
I can always blame the lack of PCI-e 3.0 on my CPU. :mrgreen:
Re: 3DMark '13 score thread
Cracking OC at 5Ghz ! You should beat me on the physics tests by a long shot. I might have to revisit the GPU ;)