Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Using IDE Cables... Stupid Question?

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Question Using IDE Cables... Stupid Question?

    having built several windows based pcs, and not really paid that much attention to the use of ide cables (lol, they just connect things together ) i have a quick question, relating to something i heard the other day...

    ide cable
    |=========|=====|
    mobo..........1.........2

    ... if i have two devices, e.g. two ide hard drives, which part of the ide cable, 1 or 2 do i connect the primary master to (assuming, the two drives are pri-mas and pri-sla) - i heard that you connect the pri-mas to no2, is this true? and does it make a difference?

    also, is connecting one hdd and one optical drive to the same cable a bad idea? any reasons for/against this?

    cheers guys/girls


    Athlon 64 3500+ (@2.2GHz), Asus A8V Deluxe, 1Gb Corsair PC3200 (CL2)
    256Mb XFX GeForce 6800GT, Viewsonic VP201B
    SB Audigy 2 ZS, Creative Inspire TD7700
    NEC3500 (Silver), Sony DVD-ROM/CD-RW (Silver)
    WD Raptor 74Gb SATA, Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 200Gb SATA, Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 120Gb ATA133


  2. #2
    Senior Member SilentDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,745
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    16 times in 11 posts
    Make sure the jumper on each device is set to either master or slave, and NOTcable select. This way it doesnt matter.

    I think some opticals dontlike being connected to a hdd, Ive had drives that would not be recognied on the same cable.
    I think the rule is to make sure they all operate in UDMA33,66,100, or 133. If they are PIO4 drives, they wont work with a UDMA drive. Might be wrong...

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    what is this cable select thing? ive heard it a few times, but never thought to ask what it is...


    Athlon 64 3500+ (@2.2GHz), Asus A8V Deluxe, 1Gb Corsair PC3200 (CL2)
    256Mb XFX GeForce 6800GT, Viewsonic VP201B
    SB Audigy 2 ZS, Creative Inspire TD7700
    NEC3500 (Silver), Sony DVD-ROM/CD-RW (Silver)
    WD Raptor 74Gb SATA, Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 200Gb SATA, Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 120Gb ATA133


  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Inverness (UK)
    Posts
    293
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Captain Fizz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Maximus Hero VIII
      • CPU:
      • i7 6700K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair
      • Storage:
      • SM951 + Many more
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 980Ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Supressor F51
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Monitor(s):
      • XB270HU Predator
    |=======|===|
    Mobo.......S.....M

    Cable is as so:
    Mobo .. Slave .. Master

    So the Master always goes to the end of the cable... Slave to the middle one.

    As long as your HDD is master, and Optical a slave - There is no reason not to have both devices on the same IDE cable.

    I wouldn't have an often used optical drive on your OS's HDD's cable though... Only one device can be accessed at any one time on an IDE cable. So I'd have the OS HDD on it's own cable if poss.
    Optical and any other HDD on the 2nd cable.
    If not, as long as the optical drive is not used often, it will do no harm. (And only when in use will it slow it down at all)

    And Cable Select... If you have the jumpers set to CS, when you plug the device into the slave connector - It will be a slave, if it's plugged into the master connector (end of cable) it will be a master.

  5. #5
    HEXUS.social member Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    8,536
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    262 times in 168 posts
    • Allen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Maximus VIII Gene
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 6600K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Predator DDR4-3000
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 950 PRO NVMe M.2 (OS) + 2 x 512GB Samsung 960 EVO in RAID 0 (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC
      • PSU:
      • XFX P1-650X-NLG9 XXX 650W Modular
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Node 804
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" BenQ XL2730Z + 23" Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mbps
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Fizz
    As long as your HDD is master, and Optical a slave - There is no reason not to have both devices on the same IDE cable.
    Apparantly it does, but I don't know for sure. There was a discussion a while ago where people said that having a HDD and CD/DVD on the same cable will make both devices run at the same speed as the slowest device, the CD/DVD, therefore running a HDD and CD/DVD on the same cable will slow the HDD down.

    Saying that, I haven't tried it, but have always used different cables for different types of drives.

  6. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    yeah, what ill probably have is this...

    1x 74gb raptor, sata
    1x 200gb seagate, sata
    1x 120gb maxtor, ide
    1x dvd/cdrw, ide

    ill be using the raptor as primary boot, so technically i could use 2x sata and 1x ide, but could also use 2x sata and 2x ide?

    oooh, im so excited, all the parts arrive tomorrow.. its only been over two weeks!!!


    Athlon 64 3500+ (@2.2GHz), Asus A8V Deluxe, 1Gb Corsair PC3200 (CL2)
    256Mb XFX GeForce 6800GT, Viewsonic VP201B
    SB Audigy 2 ZS, Creative Inspire TD7700
    NEC3500 (Silver), Sony DVD-ROM/CD-RW (Silver)
    WD Raptor 74Gb SATA, Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 200Gb SATA, Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 120Gb ATA133


  7. #7
    Large Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked
    99 times in 64 posts
    You should use the Maxtor as primary master and the optical drive as secondary master.
    To err is human. To really foul things up ... you need a computer.

  8. #8
    HEXUS.social member Agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    19,185
    Thanks
    739
    Thanked
    1,614 times in 1,050 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Fizz
    As long as your HDD is master, and Optical a slave - There is no reason not to have both devices on the same IDE cable.

    I wouldn't have an often used optical drive on your OS's HDD's cable though... Only one device can be accessed at any one time on an IDE cable. So I'd have the OS HDD on it's own cable if poss.
    Optical and any other HDD on the 2nd cable.
    If not, as long as the optical drive is not used often, it will do no harm. (And only when in use will it slow it down at all)

    And Cable Select... If you have the jumpers set to CS, when you plug the device into the slave connector - It will be a slave, if it's plugged into the master connector (end of cable) it will be a master.
    Yes, there is a reason not to have both on the same cable.
    A device on IDE can only opperate as fast as the slowest drive. So if you have a drive opperating at UDMA33 (most optical based ones), and a UDMA133 drive on the same cable, the UDMA133 drive will drop back to UDMA33.
    The other point about being accessed is also a bit off. While mass data will only be transmitted during requested times, the IDE controler and the drive are talking a heck of a lot more than you give credit for. The drive will constantly be handling interupts and various none-sence the IDE controler decides it wants to generate. Just because your not copying / writing files to the drive, the computer will still be talking to it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    And by trying to force me to like small pants, they've alienated me.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Inverness (UK)
    Posts
    293
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Captain Fizz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Maximus Hero VIII
      • CPU:
      • i7 6700K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair
      • Storage:
      • SM951 + Many more
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 980Ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Supressor F51
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Monitor(s):
      • XB270HU Predator
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent
    Yes, there is a reason not to have both on the same cable.
    A device on IDE can only opperate as fast as the slowest drive. So if you have a drive opperating at UDMA33 (most optical based ones), and a UDMA133 drive on the same cable, the UDMA133 drive will drop back to UDMA33.
    Unsure about the amount of chatter the drives will produce but the above comment was true on older chipsets - But, I am 99.9% sure it is not the case for any current chipset. (Do you have proof either way? This has been bugging me for years... )
    If you check speeds, look in device manager, copy large files about, benchmark using various apps - There is no difference in speed (UDMA33/66/100/133) of the drive whether the Optical drive is plugged in or not.

    Personally, if I had DGauld's drives:
    Prim Mast: 1x 120gb maxtor, ide
    Sec Mast: 1x dvd/cdrw, ide
    And the 2 other HDD's on SATA.

    I found better performance, especially between 2 HDD's (obviously really) when I had 2 HDD's and 2 optical drives:
    Prim Mast - OS HDD
    Prim Slave - CDRW
    Sec Mast - Storage HDD
    Sec Slave - DVD

    The HDD's have their own channels effectively and transfer between HDD's was FAR quicker than having both HDD's on the same channel. Also CD copying on the fly took as long as it did to burn the CD.
    Far more effective IMHO.

    I always try to have a HDD per channel, and the Optical drives put on the least used channels if possible. If not, then my OS HDD on it's own so other HDD transfers do not interrupt my OS Drive. (Lots of large files moving about all the time.)
    (Oops - Unintentional rant... The last half of this post was just to give a bit of background behind my view)
    Last edited by Captain Fizz; 16-11-2004 at 10:32 AM.

  10. #10
    Goron goron Kumagoro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,147
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked
    170 times in 139 posts
    I would have thought it would only run at the slowest speed when both devices on the IDE are interoperating between each other. So burning a CD on the same IDE will make it run slower at that time. If you are that bothered about that then have two burners, then then you write stuff from primaray HDD use the secondary burner and when using the secondary HDD use the primary burner and on the fly disc to disc burning should be ok.

  11. #11
    HEXUS.social member Agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    19,185
    Thanks
    739
    Thanked
    1,614 times in 1,050 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Fizz
    Unsure about the amount of chatter the drives will produce but the above comment was true on older chipsets - But, I am 99.9% sure it is not the case for any current chipset. (Do you have proof either way? This has been bugging me for years... )
    If you check speeds, look in device manager, copy large files about, benchmark using various apps - There is no difference in speed (UDMA33/66/100/133) of the drive whether the Optical drive is plugged in or not.
    Like you said, it does depend on the chipset, but i know that the drives talk even when not "in use". Unplug the drive randomly when its not "in use", and watch your system cry (just did it on my i845 board and it didnt like it one bit, no windows or anything relating to the CD drive was open).

    The 33/66/100/133 thing: i must admit, i thought the same as you, but i found a big document on it (well, somone gave me the link anyway that explained all this), which did say otherwise. How true it was, i dont know, but i remember it saying that only one UDMA mode could be used per channel, which would mean only one transfer speed could be used. I wish i could find it so i could post it though
    If i get the time, i may well run some of my own benchmarks, as a lot of the stuff does seem to contradict itself at best.
    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    And by trying to force me to like small pants, they've alienated me.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Inverness (UK)
    Posts
    293
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Captain Fizz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Maximus Hero VIII
      • CPU:
      • i7 6700K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair
      • Storage:
      • SM951 + Many more
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 980Ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Supressor F51
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Monitor(s):
      • XB270HU Predator
    Found this for DGauld:
    This covers Master/Slave/Cable Select:
    http://computer.howstuffworks.com/ide4.htm
    ( First page of article )
    But having trouble finding out about the 2 devices on the same controller...
    Still looking tho...

    And Agent - It WAS your sig I seen the CS strip in. Class!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The IDE cables in shuttles…
    By Jimmy Little in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 22-07-2004, 12:30 PM
  2. gold ide cables
    By ozzymactom in forum Chassis and Mods
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 16-06-2004, 05:40 PM
  3. Cutting IDE cables?
    By Aaron in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 13-03-2004, 12:28 AM
  4. ide cables
    By megah0 in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18-11-2003, 02:25 PM
  5. Where an I find cheap IDE Cables?
    By Mahdi in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-10-2003, 07:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •