R7 1800X
https://www.chiphell.com/article-17555-3.html (Chinese)
http://3c.3dmgame.com/show-52-5363-1-all.html (Chinese)
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-page...-review,1.html
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/10...nm-zen/?page=9
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...ce-review.html
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ryzen-...eview-1222033/
http://www.eteknix.com/amd-ryzen-7-1...cessor-review/
https://arstechnica.co.uk/gadgets/20...-ryzen-review/
https://www.hardwareluxx.de/index.ph...x-im-test.html
http://www.kitguru.net/components/cp...0x-cpu-review/
http://www.pcworld.com/article/31757...amd-power.html
https://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/20...tform-review/7
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11170/...00x-and-1700/3
http://techreport.com/review/31366/a...-cpus-reviewed
https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Proces...ew-Now-and-Zen
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...ce-review.html
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/807...ady/index.html
http://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews...fps-benchmarks
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/amd-ry...iew-33811.html
http://pclab.pl/art72996.html
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ryzen-...eview-1222033/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3eCASYfg-Y
R7 1800X,R7 1700X
http://www.sweclockers.com/test/2342...0x-och-7-1700x
https://nl.hardware.info/reviews/722...tie-voor-intel
R7 1700X
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2017/...x_cpu_review/1
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages...-review,1.html
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/10...700x-14nm-zen/
R7 1800X,R7 1700X and R7 1700
http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...00x_1700/9.htm
http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-ryze...-review_191753
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-03/...00x-1700-test/
R7 1700 overclocking review
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...rn-of-the-Jedi
http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-ryze...ocessor_192191
R7 1800X Linux review
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=24219
R7 1700 server review
https://www.servethehome.com/amd-ryz...ux-benchmarks/
In-depth Ryzen 7 technical analysis in non-gaming scenarios
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads...nical.2500572/
IMPORTANT INFO.
SMT was not deactivated in many reviews leading to regressions in gaming performance:
http://i.imgur.com/UFaWvLe.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/UFaWvLe.jpg
The regressions are reasonably noticeable and many review sites are not aware of this.
Ryzen was also not launched with Windows drivers:
http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-ryze...view_191753/15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legitreviews guy
So there might be room for some better performance figures as time progresses.Quote:
I put it in the conclusion on the last page. The quote came direct from AMD's John Taylor. There was talk of it coming with Ryzen 5 and then they said 'in the next month' in an official statement that was e-mailed out last night.
Update!!
The SMT issue is down to Windows 10. It looks like The Stilt has done even more testing:
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads...#post-38775732
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ryzen-...eview-1222033/Quote:
I did some 3D testing and eventhou there is not nearly enough data to confirm it, I'd say the SMT regression is infact a Windows 10 related issue.
In 3D testing I did recently on Windows 10, the title which illustrated the biggest SMT regression was Total War: Warhammer.
All of these were recorded at 3.5GHz, 2133MHz MEMCLK with R9 Nano:
Windows 10 - 1080 Ultra DX11:
8C/16T - 49.39fps (Min), 72.36fps (Avg)
8C/8T - 57.16fps (Min), 72.46fps (Avg)
Windows 7 - 1080 Ultra DX11:
8C/16T - 62.33fps (Min), 78.18fps (Avg)
8C/8T - 62.00fps (Min), 73.22fps (Avg)
At the moment this is just pure speculation as there were variables, which could not be isolated.
Windows 10 figures were recorded using PresentMon (OCAT), however with Windows 7 it was necessary to use Fraps.
It seems the 4C versions which appear to use only one CCX might be fine.
It looks like Hardware.fr has done some more testing with SMT off.
http://www.hardware.fr/getgraphimg.php?id=451&n=1
But here is the big kicker!!
http://www.hardware.fr/getgraphimg.php?id=453&n=1
They tested in performance mode and found not all the regressions were actually only down to SMT! ;)
08/03/2017 Update
Another day another potential issue which might have hampered performance at launch:
http://hwbot.org/newsflash/4335_ryze...ect_benchmarks
I seriously think with any AMD launch you need +3 months added to the launch to actually get an accurate picture!! :pQuote:
Originally Posted by der8auer