now that more than 50% of us are AMD fans

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Boogle

I think Intel have the best price/performance ratio if you're willing to make do with SFF or MicroATX.

I prefer the P-M not just for performance, but because of its power saving features. Wasting energy is just that - a waste. Plus a P-M can run passive when idle, and extremely quiet under load :)

---

Edit: ta for the links.

Interesting, me is thinking that this could be the ideal solution for a SFF, quiet, living room PC capable of doing High Definition scaling (with relevant bits) video, music etc.

Perhaps there is a use for Intel yet, price permitting of course. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iranu

Edit: ta for the links.

Interesting, me is thinking that this could be the ideal solution for a SFF, quiet, living room PC capable of doing High Definition scaling (with relevant bits) video, music etc.

Perhaps there is a use for Intel yet, price permitting of course. ;)

---

Indeed, and there is a barebones PC with the Pentium M. Actually there are 2, both from AOpen.

EY855 and EZ855 :)

P-M comes with a banana core? sweet...


...


I'll get me coat. :(

Boogle - thanks I shall have to look into that.

Moderators - thanks very much for editing my last post for me. I should know better than to abuse people (even if it is the Deputy Prime Minister.) :Oops:

Please accept my apologies.

Personally, as someone who primarily plays games, AMD all the way. At the moment anyway, I had a p4 2.4 before my current system, and it ran very well

PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT

Zak, that's me, would like to apologise for claiming, totally wrongly, that P4 2.4's wouldn't Hyper Thread.

I was wrong, wrong wrong wrong, and more wrong. So wrong in fact, that I shall now say sorry. Again.

Quote:

---

SORRY

---

I was wrong.....sorry. :)