Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Fastest Drive option

  1. #1
    0iD
    0iD is offline
    M*I*A 0iD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Happy Llama Land
    Posts
    13,247
    Thanks
    1,435
    Thanked
    1,209 times in 757 posts
    • 0iD's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Leave my mother out of it!
      • CPU:
      • If I knew what it meant?
      • Memory:
      • Wah?
      • Storage:
      • Cupboards and drawers
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Slate & chalk
      • PSU:
      • meh
      • Case:
      • Suit or Brief?
      • Operating System:
      • Brain
      • Monitor(s):
      • I was 1 at skool
      • Internet:
      • 28k Dialup

    Fastest Drive option

    Right, I've got two Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 250gb, (Ata100 3.5lp 8ms 7200rpm 8mb with an 8ms seek time) drives.

    Now are they going to be quicker (if at all) running from the on-board IDE controller, from my promise TX200 raid card, or from a different brand/model of raid card?

    Or is there going to be no difference at all in bandwidth?
    [
    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzen
    When I say go, both walk in the opposite direction for 10 paces, draw handbags, then bitch-slap each other!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    I would expect it to be faster using the onboard IDE controler. NVIDIA has aquality ATA controler, with good drivers, and it's not attached to the PCI bus.

    Any raid card you add would be sharing bandwidth with anything else on the PCI bus.

    An quality 3rd party raid card with its own dedicated cache would be fastests, but would cost more than the drives did.

    I doubt it's going to be a big difference though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Maxtor RMA
    By Howard in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 20-12-2005, 03:44 PM
  2. Fastest PATA IDE drive?
    By 0iD in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 15-04-2005, 01:04 PM
  3. A drive troubles.
    By cptwhite_uk in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-09-2004, 07:11 PM
  4. Hard drive help
    By uk rider in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-09-2004, 10:53 PM
  5. Move XP to an already semi-filled hard drive
    By Zathras in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 14-08-2004, 10:32 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •