Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: San Diego 4000 Vs FX-55

  1. #1
    MacDaddy! darrensen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    1,695
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    43 times in 37 posts
    • darrensen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte z77 UD3H
      • CPU:
      • i7
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Loads!
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 780 GTX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 850Watt
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Storm Trooper
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 24"
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet Fibre 80mb

    Question San Diego 4000 Vs FX-55

    Has anyone got any benchmark results on these two cpu's? Would be very interesed to see the difference in performace on these two badboys!!

  2. #2
    If your 5555... Swafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Then I'm...
    Posts
    6,666
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I remember seing a review ages ago, think the FX55 is just a bit quicker, seing as its AMDs flagship

    Anyway, them San Diegos should clock pretty well, I'm guessing that the XP4000 would outpace the FX55 if clocked well.
    Quote Originally Posted by Knoxville
    As I find big muff's to be a bit of an aquired taste
    AMD Athlon 4400X2 @ 2.565PenisextentionMhz
    Dual Layer, Gold Plated, LED Power,Dual Golden OMG IT MAKES MY CodPiece BIGGER 1-1-1-1 DDR62.3 @ 1222.3433Mhz
    5 X 400GB Porn Array
    X1800XT Dildo enchanged 3D Version, 512MegaLongJohn
    Oh, did I mention.....I like sheep.....


    WWW.MrsBurley.CO.UK
    now updated

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    Even stock perfromace won't be that different. 5% at the most.

  4. #4
    System Suspect
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Kingston Upon Thames
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

  5. #5
    lazy student nvening's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,656
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked
    31 times in 30 posts
    The fx is slightly better and has an unlocked multiplyer, which is good for OC. But apparentally the 4000+ sans are good OCs too, even better!
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  6. #6
    Banned StormPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I've seen 3600MHz+ 3DMarks on FX-55's. Don't think you'll be seeing 4000+'s doing that.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    Probably becasue the people who can afford cooling able to do that can aslo afford FX-55s without much hassle.

  8. #8
    cah
    cah is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    85
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 1 post
    Can you reduce the multipliers on the AMD64 ranges??? i thought they allowed that now - if so, overclocking should be just as good with either - although probably better with a 90nm E0 stepping.

  9. #9
    RDL
    RDL is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Near Aberdeen, Scotland
    Posts
    861
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Yes, you can. But remember, the FSB can only go so high, and clocks are generally more stable with a higher multiplier and lower FSB.
    AMD 64 3500+ | Asus A32 SLi Deluxe | 2 x Corsair 512MB PC4400 Overclockers RAM| 1 x XFX 6800GT | Nexus Vantec Fan Controller | 1 x 74GB Western Digital Raptor )Boot + backup & 2x 200gb Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 (RAID 0) | Plextor 716A Black 16 x16±,x4+ Dual Layer DVD | Tagan 480W | ThermalRight XP-120 with Delta Screamer | 2x120mm YS TECH| Black Akasa Eclipse 62 | L1980U 19" TFT 12ms 500:1 DVI Ultra Slim Black & Silver | Phillips 5.1 Surround Sound| Razer Diamondback Mouse | ExactMat mousemat | Black Cherry Keyboard | WinXP Pro

  10. #10
    cah
    cah is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    85
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 1 post
    Definitely true - although i would happilly sacrifice a 0.5 multiplier gain to get more FSB even if overall clock speed was lower. If it is just a race to get clock speed then yeah multis are the best way becuase when you really overclock AMD chips they hate to work at FSB more than 2Mhz above 200 for some reason - well, thats been my experience anyway.

    I think a FSB of 250 with a 11 multi is very nice though (thinking of the 4400+ X2 ). Nice with PC4000. It just feels right
    LOL

  11. #11
    Shunned from CS:S Trippledence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Exeter Uni/Truro Cornwall
    Posts
    1,848
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    Do the 400+ san's need motherbord bios upgrades, ive got a freind whos thinking of getting one.

  12. #12
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I wouldnt mind knowing if the san diego's work out of the box or not - currently on an SN25P so more than a little concerned
    Never buy a dwarf with learning difficulties. Its not big and its not clever.

  13. #13
    MacDaddy! darrensen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    1,695
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    43 times in 37 posts
    • darrensen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte z77 UD3H
      • CPU:
      • i7
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Loads!
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 780 GTX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 850Watt
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Storm Trooper
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 24"
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet Fibre 80mb
    No not at the moment, you would need to run a BIOS update. Looks like theres only 2 ways, borrow an old amd 64 CPU and run it using the update tool or download it from the mobo site and run from floppy.....

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    Quote Originally Posted by cah
    Can you reduce the multipliers on the AMD64 ranges??? i thought they allowed that now - if so, overclocking should be just as good with either - although probably better with a 90nm E0 stepping.
    Yes, you can reduce the multipliers. Still you often need to rasie them to get the absolute max OC that is possible with the more extreme cooling. The clock generator on most motherboards becomes a limiting factor before 300+ MHz.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New my 3700 San Diego Premiminary results
    By derthballs in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 16-05-2005, 06:51 PM
  2. AMD San diego Might be a problem
    By darrensen in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 10-05-2005, 01:08 AM
  3. Winchester vs Venice vs San Diego
    By Tobeman in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-05-2005, 06:03 PM
  4. San Diego CPU
    By darrensen in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-05-2005, 08:07 PM
  5. Logitech QuickCam Pro 4000
    By Apex in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-01-2004, 12:07 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •