Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Venice or Winchester?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Venice or Winchester?

    Just wondering,

    what exactly is the difference between those 2 cores? They're both 90nm, both 512 L2 cache, both support SSE3, right? Or wrong?

    Since they're almost identical in price, which one do you think one should go for?
    Venice 3200 or Winchester 3200?

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    mutantbass head Lee H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    M28, Manchester
    Posts
    14,204
    Thanks
    337
    Thanked
    671 times in 580 posts
    • Lee H's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z370 Carbon Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 8700K Unlocked CPU
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 LPX
      • Storage:
      • 250GB 960 EVO + a few more drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 6GB Palit GTX 1060 Dual
      • PSU:
      • Antec Truepower 750W Modular Blue
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T White Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 PRO
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" Asus MX279H & 24" Acer 3D GD245HQ + the 3D glasses
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media
    Venice cores are the most up-to-date core and have SSE3 support whereas the Winchester did not.

    The venices also have an updated memory controller allowing the use of 4 sticks of memory @ PC3200 speeds as the winchesters used to drop 4 sticks back to PC2700 operating speeds.

    Hope this helps

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Mmm... nice.. I knew the Venices were newer cores but I thought the improvements from the Winchesters were more obscure and insignificant.

    That memory controller you mentioned, WildMonkey, effectively means I can add, say, a 1 gig stick of 3200 ram, added to my 2*512 megs of 3200 ram without any real problems, right? (assuming the ram timings, cas etc. are the same for all the ram sticks) That rules!
    Thanks for the reply.

  4. #4
    Senior Member chriswood_7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    1,485
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts
    • chriswood_7's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M2NE SLi
      • CPU:
      • AMD X2 5200+
      • Memory:
      • 3GB DDR2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 1x 120GB + 1x 320GB Seagate IDE
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB BFG 8800GT OC2
      • PSU:
      • 680W Hiper PSU
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Soprano w/ Window
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" HPF50s
      • Internet:
      • 10Mbit Virgin Media
    No mate

    You can only use 2 or 4 sticks as far as i know, I had this dilemma when moving to an A64 rig.. I had that type of setup with 2x256MB and 1x512 and if I had have turned it on I could have damaged my motherboard and memory. If your going A64 it has to be either 1,2 or 4 DIMM sticks, no matter if theyre all the same type of memory. I have a winchester and have problems in any DIMM slots above 1 and 2.. with random restarts and crashes, although in the first two slots its fine and runs smooth and fast.

    Oh and there is only half a dozen configurations you can have them in too normally, like in 1 and 2 or 3 and 4, i dont think you can do simm slots 1 and 3 or 4, or 2 and 3 or 4...

    Hope this helps mate

    Chris
    Last edited by chriswood_7; 20-09-2005 at 03:22 PM.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Ah, ok Chris, thanks a lot.

    I guess my options now are:
    a) Add another 2*512
    b) Add another 2*1 gig
    c) Add another 2*1 gig, and remove my old 2*512

    Should I be expecting any compromises in performance if I go for options a) or b) ?
    If the memory controller supports up to 4 sticks of 3200, there shouldn't be any, right?

  6. #6
    Senior Member sawyen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sheffield University
    Posts
    3,658
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    22 times in 21 posts
    • sawyen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Laptop motherboard
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 740QM
      • Memory:
      • 8192MB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 256GB SSD, 1TB WD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD Mobility HD 5870
      • PSU:
      • MSI stuff
      • Case:
      • N/A
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Internet:
      • Virgin ADSL rubbish
    2 x 1G should be plenty... running 4 sticks requires you to run 2T... which is abit rubbish for my preference.. you could keep that 2 sticks of 512 when u ever build another system.. say a HTPC?
    Me want Ultrabook


  7. #7
    Senior Member chriswood_7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    1,485
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    7 times in 6 posts
    • chriswood_7's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M2NE SLi
      • CPU:
      • AMD X2 5200+
      • Memory:
      • 3GB DDR2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 1x 120GB + 1x 320GB Seagate IDE
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB BFG 8800GT OC2
      • PSU:
      • 680W Hiper PSU
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Soprano w/ Window
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" HPF50s
      • Internet:
      • 10Mbit Virgin Media
    If you go winchest you will be automatically downclocked to PC2700 so id get a venice and 2 sticks of 512MB.. does anyone really need 2GB?

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    492
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Anyone who plays bf2 needs it! It took like 4 minutes to load up a map, now its done in a few seconds! I notice the diff with 2gb compared to 1gb!

  9. #9
    Senior Member sawyen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sheffield University
    Posts
    3,658
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    22 times in 21 posts
    • sawyen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Laptop motherboard
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 740QM
      • Memory:
      • 8192MB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 256GB SSD, 1TB WD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD Mobility HD 5870
      • PSU:
      • MSI stuff
      • Case:
      • N/A
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Internet:
      • Virgin ADSL rubbish
    Quote Originally Posted by ja3h
    Anyone who plays bf2 needs it! It took like 4 minutes to load up a map, now its done in a few seconds! I notice the diff with 2gb compared to 1gb!
    Enuf said.. 2GB makes a whole lot of difference when we minions play BF2..
    Me want Ultrabook


  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    Venice chips also tend to OC better.

    I have my week 17 3000+ running at 2,814Mhz on air.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    what hsf are you using, oralpain? any suggestions?

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    I'm using a Zalman 7700Cu, but thats just cause it cools my motherbaord and ram as well. I'm fairly certain the stock heatsink would be good enough to cool the cpu at this speed (312x9) and voltage (1.5). The zalman isn't even warm.

    Motherboard is a DFI NF4-DAGF, btw.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Winchester or Venice
    By Koolpc in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-09-2005, 01:42 PM
  2. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 26-06-2005, 06:42 PM
  3. Did I get the worse Venice in the world?
    By arthurleung in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 21-06-2005, 08:36 PM
  4. Free exchange of A64 Winchester core for Venice core?
    By Firejack in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 15-05-2005, 07:12 PM
  5. Winchester vs Venice vs San Diego
    By Tobeman in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-05-2005, 06:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •