Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Opty question

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Opty question

    Looking at getting a new dual core, I have been considering the opty 165/170, I keep hearing some reports that a overclocked 165/170 @ 2.6 is the same as a retail stock FX-60. Are there any stats or reviews to back up this claim? Thanks for any info

  2. #2
    Senior Member manwithnoname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,050
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    26 times in 25 posts
    Just remember it's the luck of the draw my 165 does 2.25 at stock.

    The FX-60 is essentially the same chip as a 165/170 that has been vaildate to run at 2.6

  3. #3
    awm
    awm is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    US
    Posts
    920
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    7 times in 7 posts
    Even if the opty doesn't clock quite as high you can sink the savings into a better graphics card or monitor which will be very useful for gaming (your goal I assume). I'd invest in either of them before paying 3 times as much to go from a 165 to a fx-60. And as manwithnoname implied, reports seem to indacate that 2.25 is a bad overclock for a 165 so the 165 is a great(and affordable choice). If I was buying now I'd proably go for it.

  4. #4
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Yes that sounds nice, I already have plans to get a Dell 30" or a westinghouse 37" or 42" I do have a question on those as well. I have a x1900XT already, I will probably move up to crossfire, as i already have the motherboard I just do not think its necessary right now, I only have a 21" CRT that does just fine for now. I am getting alot more into graphics and design so I need the bigger real estate. My question for the monitors is this:

    Given the dell has a larger resolution 2560X1600 vs the westinghouse at 1920X1080, how would that work out in comparison to screen size vs. resolution? I mean if I buy the smaller Dell but have the higher rez, would be roughly the equivalent in real estate with a bigger monitor and a smaller rez?

    So many questions, so little time Thanks again for all your advice.

  5. #5
    awm
    awm is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    US
    Posts
    920
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    7 times in 7 posts
    The westinghouse sounds like its intended as a TV. I would go for the Dell 30" since the westinghouse would look wierd, like having huge pixels simlar to running your crt at 640x480. Depending on what you play you may need to go CF to keep image quality for the resolution of the Dell. My impression is that the larges benifit of multiple graphics comes at high resolutions where huge numbers of pixels need to get drawn. of course I don't know the exact prices of what you're buying of what you preferences are so just take what I said as something to think about and consider.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Personal Question game.....
    By Kitty in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 394
    Last Post: 29-01-2006, 11:50 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 21-10-2005, 08:50 AM
  3. Quick Question: PSU's with 1x120mm fan question
    By philyau in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-09-2005, 02:30 PM
  4. The 78th Annual Hexus Quiz!
    By Stewart in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 23-01-2005, 02:05 PM
  5. What is Question Time
    By Saracen in forum Question Time
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-08-2003, 05:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •