Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Intel® Core™ 2 Duo processor - relative processor power?

  1. #1
    Gold Member Marcos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,119
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    26 times in 17 posts

    Intel® Core™ 2 Duo processor - relative processor power?

    So i'm looking at a laptop with Intel® Centrino® Duo mobile technology with Intel® Core™ 2 Duo processor T7400 (2.16 GHz and 667 MHz FSB)

    And right now i've got a Pentium M centrino 1.6Ghz

    is the new duo like 2x2.16Ghz ? or what

  2. #2
    radix lecti dave87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,806
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked
    931 times in 634 posts
    • dave87's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus
      • CPU:
      • i5 3470k under Corsair H80 WC
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 240gb SSD + 120gb SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus HD7950
      • PSU:
      • XFX 600w Modular
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A05FNB + Acoustipack
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x Dell S2309W (1920x1080)
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity Option 2
    New Duo will be 2x2.16ghz (2 cores) with a larger cache

  3. #3
    Gold Member Marcos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,119
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    26 times in 17 posts
    so it'd literally be over 3 times the clock speed? or processing power?

    sounds crazy to have 4.32Ghz on an ultra-portable laptop

  4. #4
    blueball
    Guest
    ...and remeber that thesse cores are more efficient at processing instructions than older CPUs

  5. #5
    Gold Member Marcos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,119
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    26 times in 17 posts
    wow, its only just been 2 years since mine was impressive, can't believe they've managed to make something even smaller and lighter with 4x the processor

    strangely though, graphics card is still a 128mb geforce turbocache type. you'd think they'd at least make it 128mb of dedicated ram or something

  6. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    41
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Technically its not 4.32Ghz, you dont just add the speed together.

    Think of it as being able to do more at once, for example 1 person building a house will take a while, add a 2nd person and it will get things done faster.

  7. #7
    Gold Member Marcos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,119
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    26 times in 17 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ArcticFox View Post
    Technically its not 4.32Ghz, you dont just add the speed together.

    Think of it as being able to do more at once, for example 1 person building a house will take a while, add a 2nd person and it will get things done faster.
    ok so is any advantage over single cores when playing games considering they are just a single application normally? disregard the gfx card

  8. #8
    radix lecti dave87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,806
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked
    931 times in 634 posts
    • dave87's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus
      • CPU:
      • i5 3470k under Corsair H80 WC
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 240gb SSD + 120gb SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus HD7950
      • PSU:
      • XFX 600w Modular
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A05FNB + Acoustipack
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x Dell S2309W (1920x1080)
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity Option 2
    It allows the OS to assign system processes to the unloaded core - allowing true 100% utilisation of the single core by a single app

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    57
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    A core 2 chip is probably ~20-30% faster than pentium M clock for clock anyway. Add on top of that you're increasing the clock speed 35% and you've got a pretty good increase even without the second core.

    Expect multithreaded games soon. Also, I have a C2D and a lot of the time both cores are loaded during games, so it must be useful.
    E64@3.4GHz@1.38v or 3.72@1.51v;P5BD-Wifi;79GTO@705/800;2GigGeil800U;20"LGwide;180Gig 64kstripe + 140Gig Mirror + 200Gig single
    Under: AlphacoolDDC, 7/16", MCRES, Nexxos XP lite, MCR120 (w/ antec fan@5v {~750rpm})

  10. #10
    Gold Member Marcos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,119
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    26 times in 17 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dave87 View Post
    It allows the OS to assign system processes to the unloaded core - allowing true 100% utilisation of the single core by a single app
    awesome

  11. #11
    The King of Vague Steve B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    5,051
    Thanks
    116
    Thanked
    67 times in 63 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ArcticFox View Post
    Technically its not 4.32Ghz, you dont just add the speed together.

    Think of it as being able to do more at once, for example 1 person building a house will take a while, add a 2nd person and it will get things done faster.
    [pedant]
    technically not quite there
    both cores cant work on the same process at once, but both people can build a house at once.

    Think about peeling carrots and potatoes. One person has to peel both carrots and potatoes, whereas two people can split the workload, one peeling carrots and one peeling potatoes. Decreasing the time it takes to complete both tasks.
    [/pedant]

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Some apps don't take advantage of it. So while one guy is peeling carrots the other guy stands there watching him.

    Another point is that the new chips are less power hungry so easier on the battery.

  13. #13
    Drop it like it's hot Howard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Surrey, South East
    Posts
    11,731
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked
    42 times in 39 posts
    • Howard's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5B
      • CPU:
      • Core2Duo E6420 2.13GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2x1gb OCZ DDR2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 250GB & 500GB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Inno3d iChill 7900GS
      • PSU:
      • Antec SmartPower 500W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Elite 330
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x AG Neovo F419
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 20mbit
    LOL at the analagies in this thread
    Home cinema: Toshiba 42XV555DB Full HD LCD | Onkyo TX-SR705 | NAD C352 | Monitor Audio Bronze B2 | Monitor Audio Bronze C | Monitor Audio Bronze BFX | Yamaha NSC120 | BK Monolith sub | Toshiba HD-EP35 HD-DVD | Samsung BD-P1400 BluRay Player | Pioneer DV-575 | Squeezebox3 | Virgin Media V+ Box
    PC: Asus P5B | Core2duo 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 PC6400 | Inno3d iChill 7900GS | Auzentech X-Plosion 7.1 | 250GB | 500GB | NEC DVDRW | Dual AG Neovo 19"
    HTPC: | Core2Duo E6420 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 | 250GBx2 | Radeon X1300 | Terratec Aureon 7.1 | Windows MCE 2005
    Laptop: 1.5GHz Centrino | 512MB | 60GB | 15" Wide TFT | Wifi | DVDRW


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •