Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 2000XP posts as 1250MHz (not 1667MHz)

  1. #1
    Spanked Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,430
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    26 times in 23 posts

    2000XP posts as 1250MHz (not 1667MHz)

    Hey all,

    Just replaced an old 100MHz FSB 1.0GHz Athlon with a 2000 XP. The problem is that it's posting as a 1250MHz (12.5x100) chip, not 1667 (12.5x133).

    I've changed the settings on the motherboard (Gigabyte GA-7N400L), AND in the BIOS - tried 100/133/166 FSB speeds and they all post as 1250MHz. I've even tried manually changing the multiplier so that it's wrong, but it will still post as 1250MHz.

    BIOS is latest version, but it's not an old motherboard anyway.
    PSU is a Zalman 300W, I've tried disconnecting all power plugs but the motherboard, so I don't think it's that.

    Searched on the internet and it seems a few people get this, but people say change the settings in the BIOS / Motherboard (which I've done) or change the battery (really? the board is about a year old) - didn't find positive replies to changing the battery either.

    Anyone know what's going on?
    Last edited by ACiD303; 21-02-2007 at 02:30 AM.

  2. #2
    awm
    awm is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    US
    Posts
    920
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    7 times in 7 posts
    Look at the motherboard dip switches/jumpers, I had a similar problem and it was set at the wrong bus speed.

  3. #3
    radix lecti dave87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,806
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked
    931 times in 634 posts
    • dave87's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus
      • CPU:
      • i5 3470k under Corsair H80 WC
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 240gb SSD + 120gb SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus HD7950
      • PSU:
      • XFX 600w Modular
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A05FNB + Acoustipack
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x Dell S2309W (1920x1080)
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity Option 2
    Yup, need to set it to 133FSB one way or another.

    Changing the multiplier wont work unless its an early chip, in which case you'd face stability issues anyway...

  4. #4
    Spanked Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,430
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    26 times in 23 posts
    This is very bizarre. Got it working, but very bizarre.

    After a few BIOS resets (as it would no longer post - and managing to corrupt a Windows installation along the way), it allowed me to POST the chip in the 100MHz setting even though it should be 133MHz. From there I could "overclock" it to 133 (well, beyond too but how stable's another question). . . so it seems normal now. A bit toasty, but got it working

    Begs the question why would you have a 133/166 setting if you cant use it - Gigabyte implicitly states that this setting is for palamino/t-bred//bartons etc. (any XP chip), yet you use the 100 setting meant for early Socket A Athlon/Durons.

  5. #5
    cat /dev/null streetster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked
    100 times in 82 posts
    • streetster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7P55D-E
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 750 2.67 @ 4.0Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair XMS DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 2x1TB Drives [RAID0]
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2xSapphire HD 4870 512MB CrossFireX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Black Widow
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • DELL U2311
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 50Mb
    Quote Originally Posted by ACiD303 View Post
    This is very bizarre. Got it working, but very bizarre.

    After a few BIOS resets (as it would no longer post - and managing to corrupt a Windows installation along the way), it allowed me to POST the chip in the 100MHz setting even though it should be 133MHz. From there I could "overclock" it to 133 (well, beyond too but how stable's another question). . . so it seems normal now. A bit toasty, but got it working

    Begs the question why would you have a 133/166 setting if you cant use it - Gigabyte implicitly states that this setting is for palamino/t-bred//bartons etc. (any XP chip), yet you use the 100 setting meant for early Socket A Athlon/Durons.
    My First gigabyte (7zx-r or something) socket a motherboard didnt actually support 133mhz fsb despite having "100/133 fsb" in massive writing on the box... which was fine for my duron 750 but I ended up getting a nforce2 board when i upgraded to an athlon XP...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. how many posts for FS forum...
    By MiNiMaL_FuSS in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 26-08-2005, 07:27 PM
  2. Posts Per Day
    By XTR in forum HEXUS Suggestions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16-03-2004, 08:33 PM
  3. The post count/avatar thread
    By Zathras in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 25-07-2003, 08:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •