390x review

[outwar6010]

http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages...-review,1.html

[kalniel]

http://www.pcworld.com/article/29373...-revealed.html

Where is the review?

All I see are AMD-provided benchmarks and that article says:

It’s impossible to tell until we’ve put the Radeon through its review paces

[outwar6010]

My bad I may have posted here quickly out of excitement.

[Ttaskmaster]

It's up there now - Loads of pages.
Basic run down is that this is a 290 rebrand, with a bit more memory that likely won't get used, a slightly higher clock and OK-ish temperatures.
Nothing really stood out and I didn't even bother scan-reading half of it.

[kalniel]

It's up there now - Loads of pages.
Basic run down is that this is a 290 rebrand, with a bit more memory that likely won't get used, a slightly higher clock and OK-ish temperatures.
Nothing really stood out and I didn't even bother scan-reading half of it.

This thread was originally titled Fury X review and linked to a 'preview' that just contained AMD PR stuff.

[gupsterg]

Quite like this page out of the HardOCP one Link:- http://www.hardocp.com/article/2015/...9#.VYMHwVKD3fZ

Didn't have high expectations after having seen this thread a few days ago, Link:- http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1865280

[GuidoLS]

Not to be a stickler, but shouldn't this be in the hardware/gpu sub? I realize that there's a feeding frenzy going on for the non-released cards that nobody has any real information on, but there are already 20 or so similar threads to this, many started by Hexus staff.

And while tangentially gaming related, I think hardware reviews don't match the intended theme.