Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 19 of 19

Thread: Bridge Camera?

  1. #17
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    30,745
    Thanks
    1,783
    Thanked
    3,283 times in 2,645 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Bridge Camera?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob_B View Post
    A puts stuff in/out of focus?
    S for shutter speed (I still have to take a pic first to see if it's light/dark, I don't just 'know' yet)
    P for...umm...summat or other
    P lets the camera sort out aperture (wideness of hole the light's coming through) and shutter speed (how long the hole stays open) for you - by doing that you cede control, but the camera will keep the values within it's capabilities.

    A gives you control of aperture. You set the size of the hole, and the camera then works out how long it needs to stay open to properly expose the scene.

    S does the same but for shutter speed - you set it, and the camera works out how wide the hole must open for the scene to be properly exposed by the time it's closed again.

    You don't need to 'know' the exposure parameters - the camera will have a light meter built in and in all three modes it will adjust settings to properly expose the scene. The exceptions only occur when you select such extreme values that the camera doesn't have the range of adjustment to create the right exposure, for example setting an extremely fast shutter speed with a lens that doesn't open very wide.

    Adjusting the shutter speed has the most noticeable effect with a compact/bridge camera, as it's the usual blur thing. Adjusting the aperture might have a slight effect on the depth of field (how big the region in focus is), but with these camera's it's not a huge effect. Rather it's a) another tool to get the correct exposure for the automatic settings and b) it can be set to keep the aperture at the value the camera performs best - my canon 720is was sharpest at f/4 for example.

    The final frontier parameter you want to look at is ISO - this is the sensitivity (gain level). You can turn this up to require less light for the same exposure, which lets you get away with a faster shutter speed or smaller aperture (ie higher f number - f/22 is much smaller than f/4 - it's 'divided by'). The problem is the higher the gain, the more noisy the image becomes.

    To actually change the exposure of a scene, you either have to shoot M, or more simply, use exposure compensation, which adds a simple + or - to the calculation of the correct exposure. It's not needed most of the time, but sometimes our eyes are compensating a lot more than we realise - sunsets need some -ve compensation or the camera tries to make them into daylight. Snowy scenes need some +ve or the camera tries to make them into grey. If in doubt, take several photos with different compensation values. If you line them up you can even start exposure blending.

  2. Received thanks from:

    Rob_B (15-03-2011),Tonka777 (15-03-2011)

  3. #18
    Senior Member Tonka777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    623
    Thanks
    221
    Thanked
    73 times in 53 posts
    • Tonka777's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z170-A
      • CPU:
      • 6700K
      • Memory:
      • 16gb Vengeance 3000
      • Storage:
      • 128gb 830 & 1Tb+1Tb+500Gb Samsung F1's
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 670 Signature 2
      • PSU:
      • Antec TruePower 650
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC7-FW
      • Operating System:
      • 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq E2220HD & Iiyama E1900WS
      • Internet:
      • Sky ADSL2

    Re: Bridge Camera?

    Thanks for that explanation Kalniel, i found it useful.

  4. #19
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    30,745
    Thanks
    1,783
    Thanked
    3,283 times in 2,645 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Bridge Camera?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tonka777 View Post
    Thanks for that explanation Kalniel, i found it useful.
    You're welcome.

    PS 5MP isn't necessarily sub-par - the best photos I have printed so far (up to something like 16x10") have all been from a 3MP compact

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Please Do Not Post Questions In The Welcome Forum!
    By MD in forum Welcome to HEXUS!
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-04-2012, 09:43 PM
  2. Bridge Camera
    By lazer in forum Photography
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 05-06-2010, 01:09 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25-05-2009, 08:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •