I thought this might be useful for some of you:
https://translate.google.com/transla...%2F&edit-text=
http://i.imgur.com/J41pwqN.png
Printable View
I thought this might be useful for some of you:
https://translate.google.com/transla...%2F&edit-text=
http://i.imgur.com/J41pwqN.png
no CUDA in the tests... ?
does it not run CUDA?
I've never heard of it using CUDA. RAW conversion isn't necessarily a massively parallelisable task, and I think the results show single thread performance is quite important.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zak33
ok got it
ta
The AMD APUs do seem to do better than the Core i3 CPUs though,and the FX8320 does very well for the price.
Lightroom does not take advantage of OCL like Photoshop
Capture one however does
Video is in German but indicates they generated 30 jpegs at the same resolution as the RAW files. They used sRGB and 87% quality for the jpegs.Quote:
Overall, we have converted 30 raw image files from a Nikon D800 with a total size of 1.23 GiByte.
Thanks for this - I searched and searched (obviously very poorly!) looking for something that would give me a good indication of CPU perf in LR and I couldn't find anything until now! It's a shame more reviews don't include LR peformance.
Would be interesting to see where the Devil's Canyon CPUs rank...
Lr works best with batching if you have more than 1 batch running
It seems Sweclockers also has done some LR tests too:
https://translate.google.com/transla...ry-edition%2F8
http://i.imgur.com/4jfCuL2.png