I thought this might be useful for some of you:
https://translate.google.com/transla...%2F&edit-text=
I thought this might be useful for some of you:
https://translate.google.com/transla...%2F&edit-text=
Last edited by kalniel; 12-05-2021 at 08:49 AM. Reason: closing old thread to new comments
Funkstar (29-06-2014)
no CUDA in the tests... ?
does it not run CUDA?
Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
ok got it
ta
Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
The AMD APUs do seem to do better than the Core i3 CPUs though,and the FX8320 does very well for the price.
Lightroom does not take advantage of OCL like Photoshop
Capture one however does
Video is in German but indicates they generated 30 jpegs at the same resolution as the RAW files. They used sRGB and 87% quality for the jpegs.Overall, we have converted 30 raw image files from a Nikon D800 with a total size of 1.23 GiByte.
Last edited by CAT-THE-FIFTH; 28-06-2014 at 10:16 AM.
Thanks for this - I searched and searched (obviously very poorly!) looking for something that would give me a good indication of CPU perf in LR and I couldn't find anything until now! It's a shame more reviews don't include LR peformance.
Would be interesting to see where the Devil's Canyon CPUs rank...
Lr works best with batching if you have more than 1 batch running
| Photographer |
It seems Sweclockers also has done some LR tests too:
https://translate.google.com/transla...ry-edition%2F8
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)