Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Canon EOS 5D

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    26
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Canon EOS 5D

    Does anyone know why this Canon Digital SLR does not use the EF-S lenses?

    I have a 350D and am considering upgrade options. Forking out for the 20D for only small enhancements doesn't seem that good (come to think of it, neither does the list price for the 5D either but it's got sooooo many more megapixels....

  2. #2
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    It's because the EF-S lenses are designed for cameras with an CMOS sensor the same size as the 20D, the 300/350D etc. The 5D has a sensor the same size as a 35mm film frame and so the EF-S lenses don't have a large enough image circle to cover the entire frame. When used on a 350D/20D the EF-S 18-55 lens has a field of view roughly equivalent to a 28-80 lens on a 35mm camera- so if you want the same on a 5D you'll just have to use a 28-80 lens.

    TBH if you're spending £2k on a 5D you should not be sticking sub-£100 lenses on it- unless it's the 50mm F1.8. The 24-105 F4L lens they plan on bundling with it will likely turn out to be an excellent all round lens, so just cough up a bit extra to get the kit.

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    26
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Thanks for the excellent feedback. I already have a number of Canon EF lenses, so don't want to change Manufacturer. I suspect I'll just have to save for that little bit longer....

  4. #4
    Sublime HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Void.. Floating
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked
    233 times in 160 posts
    • Stoo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Mac Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2*Xeon 5450 @ 2.8GHz, 12MB Cache
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 1600MHz FBDIMM
      • Storage:
      • ~ 2.5TB + 4TB external array
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD 4870
      • Case:
      • Mac Pro
      • Operating System:
      • OS X 10.7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Samsung 244T Black
      • Internet:
      • Zen Max Pro
    Or you can save a bit of cash and get the body only version and couple it with the Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD (which is one of the best lenses on the market, and cheap too)
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  5. #5
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    From the prices quoted in AP when they announced it, it looked like the body + lens kit was only going to be about £150 more than the body only- and £150 for an L series lens is a raging bargain. Have to see how it pans out when it hits the shops of course.

  6. #6
    Sublime HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Void.. Floating
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked
    233 times in 160 posts
    • Stoo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Mac Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2*Xeon 5450 @ 2.8GHz, 12MB Cache
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 1600MHz FBDIMM
      • Storage:
      • ~ 2.5TB + 4TB external array
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD 4870
      • Case:
      • Mac Pro
      • Operating System:
      • OS X 10.7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Samsung 244T Black
      • Internet:
      • Zen Max Pro
    Hmm, I would have thought the price differential for the body only would have been greater than that, might be worth waiting a month or two after it's launch and seeing what the prices are like then?
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    730
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    you know, I have to wonder if someone who has to ask why the 5D doesn't use EF-S lenses and cares about how many megapixels it has should be buying that sort of camera...

  8. #8
    Sublime HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Void.. Floating
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked
    233 times in 160 posts
    • Stoo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Mac Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2*Xeon 5450 @ 2.8GHz, 12MB Cache
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 1600MHz FBDIMM
      • Storage:
      • ~ 2.5TB + 4TB external array
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD 4870
      • Case:
      • Mac Pro
      • Operating System:
      • OS X 10.7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Samsung 244T Black
      • Internet:
      • Zen Max Pro
    It doesn't matter, they ask the question, they get the answer.

    The 5D is a valid upgrade from the 350D, and if someone has come from a film SLR background they might not know about the ins and outs of a digital slr, but want something closer to film quality.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  9. #9
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    So Oakey, care to give me the 35mm equivalent field of view of the 65mm lens on my Fuji GSW690II?

  10. #10
    Prize winning member. rajagra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,023
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Oakey
    you know, I have to wonder if someone who has to ask why the 5D doesn't use EF-S lenses and cares about how many megapixels it has should be buying that sort of camera...
    Actually, there is a valid question to be asked. Could a new full-frame DSLR use EF-S lenses, while restricting you to using the central image area? Or even allow you to use EF-S lenses freely, and let you deal with vignetting yourself?

    Technically, the answer to these questions is almost certainly yes.

    It would be nice to be given the option, even if it is a poor one.
    DFI LanParty UT NF4 SLI-D; AMD64 3500+ Winchester ;
    2x XFX 6600GT ; Corsair XMS3200XLPRO TWINX 1GB;
    Dell 2405FPW TFT.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    730
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rajagra
    Actually, there is a valid question to be asked. Could a new full-frame DSLR use EF-S lenses, while restricting you to using the central image area? Or even allow you to use EF-S lenses freely, and let you deal with vignetting yourself?

    Technically, the answer to these questions is almost certainly yes.

    It would be nice to be given the option, even if it is a poor one.
    The original poster gave me the impression he hasn't really done any homework on the camera or have much knowledge regarding DSLR's, which makes you wonder why anyone in their right mind would spend somewhere in the region of £2000 (or is it more like £2700?) for something they know little about. I've noticed quite an influx lately in 'n00bs' buying DSLR's such as the 20D, mostly over at OcUK forums. I don't see why someone would go from a 350D to a 5D on the basis of "it has soooo many megapixels". Also saying the 20D only offers 'small enhancements' over the 350D is a bit, erm, exagerated.

    to put it in shorter terms, anyone who was seriously interested in a 5D would do some research beforehand, in which they would no doubt find the answer to their original question. Nobody spends that sort of money 'blind'. This seemed more a case of wanting a 5D because it's the latest DSLR from Canon.
    Last edited by Oakey; 09-09-2005 at 01:47 AM.

  12. #12
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    ....or maybe shelmec is doing their research by asking questions on forums where they might reasonably expect to encounter people who have answers to their questions.

    I worked for years in a camera shop, and plenty of the professional photographers who came in knew less about hardware than I did- could I shoot like them though? No. Ultimately a camera is just a tool you use to realise your artistic vision, it's not an object to fetishise and worship. Getting snotty about people who buy expensive cameras is like getting snotty about people who buy Vapochills without serving their time on Deltas and watercooling first. If you have a great eye for a picture, why not come and ask how you can best capture it?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    712
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    Quote Originally Posted by rajagra
    Actually, there is a valid question to be asked. Could a new full-frame DSLR use EF-S lenses, while restricting you to using the central image area? Or even allow you to use EF-S lenses freely, and let you deal with vignetting yourself?

    Technically, the answer to these questions is almost certainly yes.

    It would be nice to be given the option, even if it is a poor one.
    IIRC, you can modify the mount on some EF-S lenses - people started doing this to use the 18-55 'kit' lens from the 300D on their 10D's, but I also remember there being a physical clearance issue - rear of the lens versus mirror mechanism - and it all ending horribly in tears when they pressed the shutter.

    I guess the same experiments will crop up (no pun intended) with other EF-S's and the 5D...

    S.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    730
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rave
    ....or maybe shelmec is doing their research by asking questions on forums where they might reasonably expect to encounter people who have answers to their questions.

    I worked for years in a camera shop, and plenty of the professional photographers who came in knew less about hardware than I did- could I shoot like them though? No. Ultimately a camera is just a tool you use to realise your artistic vision, it's not an object to fetishise and worship. Getting snotty about people who buy expensive cameras is like getting snotty about people who buy Vapochills without serving their time on Deltas and watercooling first. If you have a great eye for a picture, why not come and ask how you can best capture it?
    I'm not looking to argue, I'm just saying that if you think "i'm going to spend £2500 on a camera" you tend to read up on it beforehand. The DPReview preview for example mentions why the 5D doesn't use EF-S lenses.

    The OP said "forking out for a 20D for small enhancements doesn't seem that good." The difference between the 350D and the 20D is what? £400-£500? The difference between the 350D / 20D and the 5D is about £1800 and £1200. The general consensus is that the 5D doesn't really offer a lot over the 20D, if you want a full frame camera then sure, it's an obvious choice. If not however, is it worth spending all that money? I think people are seeing the 5D as a successor to the 20D, that's not really what it is at all.

    The guy is possibly going to spend a lot of cash he's worked and saved hard for, at the least shouldn't people be asking if the 5D is the camera for him, explaining what it offers, differences over the 20D, etc?

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    712
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    Quote Originally Posted by Oakey
    ...The guy is possibly going to spend a lot of cash he's worked and saved hard for, at the least shouldn't people be asking if the 5D is the camera for him, explaining what it offers, differences over the 20D, etc?
    Agreed.

    Also, if full frame isn't a necessity, but he doesn't think the 20D has enough for him, then perhaps a s/h 1D2 would be worth a look - at probably half the cost of a new 5D..

    S.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    730
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueMagician
    Agreed.

    Also, if full frame isn't a necessity, but he doesn't think the 20D has enough for him, then perhaps a s/h 1D2 would be worth a look - at probably half the cost of a new 5D..

    S.
    Or he could hold out 2-3 months and see if Canon announce a 30D

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Canon EOS 350D - can I use lenses from the A1?
    By Paul Adams in forum Photography
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-07-2005, 01:10 PM
  2. Some pics from my wedding- taken with my canon eos 300d
    By menthel in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 20-02-2005, 01:18 PM
  3. Canon EOS 20D
    By Oakey in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-01-2005, 01:20 PM
  4. Canon Eos 300D kit £430
    By Rave in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-12-2004, 01:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •