But TM doesn't have any remorse for what he did. So i'm still to a loss to what it has to do with things?.Originally posted by Big RICHARD
The problem with this is it's seen as not having remorse for shooting someone. If you get punched in the street and defend yourself until the other person is in a bloody heap, unconscious, then not calling an ambulance would get you done under the unreasonable force argument. Even if you feel like leaving the little bastard to die! TM felt like leaving the rubbishrubbishrubbishrubbish to die, but shouldn't really have done it (in the eyes of the law). He was probably getting his own back for the fear he was in and also preventing a reoccurance of his house getting burgled in the future. It's a method of crime prevention, a bit harsh I know, but it works!
I would have called the ambulance, but I might have made sure they were both dead first. I don't know, people react in strange ways to fear and anger.
Because the law states he did it with unreasonable force and showed no remorse for it. If he had phoned the emergancy services he might have got away with it.not_your_punk i stil don't see why he was punished for ridding the world of a dirty thieving gypsy
Different sitaution i know but i think you'll find that someone who killed a child while speeding would get less of a prison sentance if he was sorry for someone who wasn't sorry. Just trying to point out we're all influenced by human nature.
TiG