HEre is one for you all to ponder over: -
Do super famous people desrve all the hype and following. I belive not.
Super famouspeopleare normally big name actors and franky do no serve any useful purpose. I also belive there acting ability is also questionable as I have visted west end plays and the talent is far superior, the difference? some may not be as good for eye candy or have the right contacts. These small actors perform life and do not get retakes and have to get it spot on first time. I am aware of rehearsals however they get far fewer than film actors and they are happy to work for less money. Vin diesal high demand for appearing at the end of a recent film shows how petty they can be.
Of course it is not just about actors you have singers too, many of them mime today they have no talent. Why get bigmoney and recognition for stealing others talents? Then we have famous scientist and the like, that if they get any recognition these people have made a wortwhile contribution butdo not get any recognition except the lucky few. The amount of people I come across aware of Newton is ever dwindling.
SO whydo people travel mile to shakes hands with a low talented, over priced, and nonachieving actor? SOme actors now 'help charities, strange how they never use there own money or if they do it is spare change. YET everytimethey do it they make sure everyone know about it, food for thought there.
People who do make a useful contribution to society such as police and nurses frequently get abuse and people metting them give them no recognition or respect forwhat they do.
That said if I passed a famous popularstarthebest they can expect from me is a quick glance followed by a sour face.
There you go that my arguement to start, it is by no means complete or solid.